165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3758914)
1. [Present status of mass screening of cancer of the uterine cervix].
Kutsuzawa T; Moriya S; Okubo H; Sakuragi N; Ichinohe K
Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 1986 Jul; 61(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 3758914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. False negative rate in mass screening for cervical cancer.
Sato S; Mikino H; Matsunaga G; Yajima A
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(3):836-7. PubMed ID: 9622728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Importance of cancer of the cervix in Cataluña: considerations on an eventual screening program].
Spagnolo de la Torre E; Segura Benedicto A; Vila Macau R; Andrés Martínez J; Sans Menéndez S
Med Clin (Barc); 1984 Jan; 82(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 6708615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Pitfalls in the screening and early diagnosis of cervical cancer.
Wain GV; Hacker NF
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Feb; 2(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 2102310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Mass screening for cancer of the uterine cervix].
Berget A
Ugeskr Laeger; 1975 Jul; 137(27):1558-9. PubMed ID: 1145871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Epidemiology of cancer of the cervix uteri (author's transl)].
Sachs H; Hasche C
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1974 Nov; 34(11):921-30. PubMed ID: 4435345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Systematic screening for cancer of the uterine cervix (epidemiologic aspects)].
Campion J; Flamant R
Bull Inst Natl Sante Rech Med; 1966; 21(5):977-94. PubMed ID: 5976404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Problem of uterine and ovarian cancer mass screening].
Ohmura M; Oda M
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2002 Nov; 29(11):1907-16. PubMed ID: 12465389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative vaginal smears].
Weintraub D
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Nov; 117(11):921. PubMed ID: 9471658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Report on a three-county cervical cancer screening project.
Whitlock NH; Long SE; Kuemmerer JM
J S C Med Assoc; 1972 Jun; 68(6):237-46. PubMed ID: 4504050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The significance of endocervical cells in the diagnosis of cervical epithelial changes.
Elias A; Linthorst G; Bekker B; Vooijs PG
Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 6575534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cytological diagnosis of cancer of the uterine cervix. Results during 1971].
Gerber E; Vajda D
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1972 Oct; 92(10):813-28. PubMed ID: 4660894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Part 1: Screening for cervical cancer.
Gollober M
Nurse Pract; 1977; 4(5):20, 24, 31. PubMed ID: 492615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative smears].
Vassilakos P; de Marval F; Muñoz M
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1998 Jan; 118(1):97. PubMed ID: 9580199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Systematic screening for cervix uteri cancer in the hospital].
Chabert P
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1971; 66(11):647-9. PubMed ID: 5148538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical cancer control--Rhode Island.
Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1989 Sep; 38(38):659-62. PubMed ID: 2506415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Preventive screening of the cervix uteri to prevent cervix cancer mortality].
Sindram IS
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1970 May; 114(22):916-21. PubMed ID: 5446493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [The role of colposcopy in evaluation of the cervix for unexpectedly positive pap smears].
Jesień-Sokołowska U; Madej JG
Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 10375918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Mortality from cancer of the uterine cervix in Denmark 1961-71].
Grünfeld K; Horwitz O; Lysgaard-Hansen B
Ugeskr Laeger; 1975 Jan; 137(5):251-9. PubMed ID: 1136032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Invasive cervical cancer: a failure of screening.
Spayne J; Ackerman I; Milosevic M; Seidenfeld A; Covens A; Paszat L
Eur J Public Health; 2008 Apr; 18(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 17483491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
