120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37589714)
1. I am (not) sorry: Interpersonal effects of neutralizations after a transgression.
Rutjens BT; Ackers CA; van Kleef GA
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2023 Dec; 29(4):831-848. PubMed ID: 37589714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Children's reasoning about the self-presentational consequences of apologies and excuses following rule violations.
Banerjee R; Bennett M; Luke N
Br J Dev Psychol; 2010 Nov; 28(Pt 4):799-815. PubMed ID: 21121468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Costly group apology communicates a group's sincere "intention".
Ohtsubo Y; Matsunaga M; Himichi T; Suzuki K; Shibata E; Hori R; Umemura T; Ohira H
Soc Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 15(2):244-254. PubMed ID: 31762397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sorry to ask but … how is apology effectiveness dependent on apology content and gender?
Polin B; Doyle SP; Kim S; Lewicki RJ; Chawla N
J Appl Psychol; 2024 Mar; 109(3):339-361. PubMed ID: 37856409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Embodied remorse: Physical displays of remorse increase positive responses to public apologies, but have negligible effects on forgiveness.
Hornsey MJ; Wohl MJA; Harris EA; Okimoto TG; Thai M; Wenzel M
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Aug; 119(2):367-389. PubMed ID: 31512916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sorry, not sorry: The effect of social power on transgressors' apology and nonapology.
Guilfoyle JR; Struthers CW; van Monsjou E; Shoikhedbrod A; Eghbali N; Kermani M
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Dec; 28(4):883-897. PubMed ID: 34990153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Social Consequences of Frequent Versus Infrequent Apologizing.
Schumann K; Ritchie EG; Forest A
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Mar; 49(3):331-343. PubMed ID: 34964400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sorry, Not Sorry: Effects of Different Types of Apologies and Self-Monitoring on Non-verbal Behaviors.
Yamamoto K; Kimura M; Osaka M
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():689615. PubMed ID: 34512447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How transgressor's moral identity leads to high-quality apologies: The positive effects of guilt.
Iwai T; de França Carvalho JV; Islam G
Br J Soc Psychol; 2023 Jul; 62(3):1486-1505. PubMed ID: 36920038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Actor and partner power are distinct and have differential effects on social behavior.
Overall NC; Maner JK; Hammond MD; Cross EJ; Chang VT; Low RST; Girme YU; Jayamaha SD; Reid CJ; Sasaki E
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2023 Feb; 124(2):311-343. PubMed ID: 35617223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How important is an apology to you? Forecasting errors in evaluating the value of apologies.
De Cremer D; Pillutla MM; Folmer CR
Psychol Sci; 2011 Jan; 22(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 21123857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. When the happy victimizer says sorry: children's understanding of apology and emotion.
Smith CE; Chen D; Harris PL
Br J Dev Psychol; 2010 Nov; 28(Pt 4):727-46. PubMed ID: 21121464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Drug sellers' neutralizations of guiltless drug sales and avoidance of "drug dealer" identities.
Dickinson T; Jacques S
Int J Drug Policy; 2019 Nov; 73():16-23. PubMed ID: 31330275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mental control and attributions of blame for negligent wrongdoing.
Murray S; Krasich K; Irving Z; Nadelhoffer T; De Brigard F
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jan; 152(1):120-138. PubMed ID: 35913874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Social perception in moral judgments of interpersonal transgressions.
Adams GS; O'Connor KS; Belmi P
Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Apr; 44():177-181. PubMed ID: 34688999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An analytic typology of disclaimers, excuses and justifications surrounding illness: a situational approach to health and illness.
Alonzo AA
Soc Sci Med; 1985; 21(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 4049002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Take a moment to apologize: How and why mindfulness affects apologies.
Rizvi S; Struthers CW; Shoikhedbrod A; Guilfoyle JR
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Sep; 28(3):661-675. PubMed ID: 35007099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What We Talk About When We Talk About Morality: Deontological, Consequentialist, and Emotive Language Use in Justifications Across Foundation-Specific Moral Violations.
Wheeler MA; Laham SM
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1206-16. PubMed ID: 27340149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Explanations for norm violations affect preschoolers' judgments of norm violators.
Van Wye EM; Wang M; Roberts SO
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Aug; 150(8):1688-1694. PubMed ID: 33252979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Account-giving for a corporate transgression influences moral judgment: when those who "spin" condone harm-doing.
Folkes VS; Whang YO
J Appl Psychol; 2003 Feb; 88(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 12675396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]