215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37590051)
21. Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After the US Supreme Court's Dobbs Decision.
Qato DM; Myerson R; Shooshtari A; Guadamuz JS; Alexander GC
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jun; 7(6):e2418620. PubMed ID: 38922616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of Recent Abortion Legislation on Twitter User Engagement, Sentiment, and Expressions of Trust in Clinicians and Privacy of Health Information: Content Analysis.
Swanson K; Ravi A; Saleh S; Weia B; Pleasants E; Arvisais-Anhalt S
J Med Internet Res; 2023 May; 25():e46655. PubMed ID: 37171873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Beyond Abortion: The Consequences of Overturning
Paltrow LM; Harris LH; Marshall MF
Am J Bioeth; 2022 Aug; 22(8):3-15. PubMed ID: 35652910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.
Charo RA
Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Webster versus reproductive health services.
Rhodes AM
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(6):423. PubMed ID: 2514333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Restricting Reasons: A New Battleground in Abortion Regulation.
Will JF
Hastings Cent Rep; 2020 Sep; 50(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 33095492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
Denniston L
Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
Goldman EB
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The urgent need for physician-led abortion advocacy.
Phillis M; Hackney DN; Malhotra T
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Mar; 5(3):100855. PubMed ID: 36587807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision.
Rader B; Upadhyay UD; Sehgal NKR; Reis BY; Brownstein JS; Hswen Y
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(20):2041-2047. PubMed ID: 36318194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Judicial bypass for minors post-
Horvath S; Frietsche S
Womens Health (Lond); 2023; 19():17455057231219601. PubMed ID: 38146197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.
Harrison LK; Naylor KL
Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Does overruling Roe discriminate against women (of colour)?
Räsänen J; Gothreau C; Lippert-Rasmussen K
J Med Ethics; 2022 Dec; 48(12):952-956. PubMed ID: 36180204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Abortion Trigger Laws Compared With the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act.
Cherry SB
Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; 143(3):366-368. PubMed ID: 38086056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mental Health Matters: A Look At Abortion Law Post-
Solberg LB; Telford K
Am J Law Med; 2023 Jul; 49(2-3):374-385. PubMed ID: 38344797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Balance of Rights: The Italian Way to the Abortion Controversy.
Reichlin M; Lavazza A
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2023 Jul; 32(3):368-377. PubMed ID: 36683584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. New Gaps and Urgent Needs in Graduate Medical Education and Training in Abortion.
Beasley AD; Olatunde A; Cahill EP; Shaw KA
Acad Med; 2023 Apr; 98(4):436-439. PubMed ID: 36656271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Abortion laws in the United States: Turning the calendar back 50 years?
Macklin R
Indian J Med Ethics; 2022; VII(3):175-178. PubMed ID: 35699297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The road to moderation: the significance of Webster for legislation restricting abortion.
Wardle LD
Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):376-83. PubMed ID: 2628653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Post-
Wang Y; Weiss KJ
Psychiatr Serv; 2024 Jul; 75(7):710-712. PubMed ID: 38835251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
