BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37591258)

  • 1. Comparative diagnostic yield of different endoscopic techniques for tissue sampling of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a network meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Fugazza A; Carrara S; Spadaccini M; Colombo M; Ramai D; Mangiavillano B; Chandan S; Gkolfakis P; Mohan B; Hassan C; Repici A
    Endoscopy; 2024 Jan; 56(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 37591258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Gkolfakis P; Crinò SF; Tziatzios G; Ramai D; Papaefthymiou A; Papanikolaou IS; Triantafyllou K; Arvanitakis M; Lisotti A; Fusaroli P; Mangiavillano B; Carrara S; Repici A; Hassan C; Facciorusso A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Jun; 95(6):1067-1077.e15. PubMed ID: 35124072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
    Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy versus endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with a rapid on-site evaluation for gastric subepithelial lesions: A randomized cross-over study.
    Osoegawa T; Minoda Y; Ihara E; Komori K; Aso A; Goto A; Itaba S; Ogino H; Nakamura K; Harada N; Makihara K; Tsuruta S; Yamamoto H; Ogawa Y
    Dig Endosc; 2019 Jul; 31(4):413-421. PubMed ID: 30723945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy and bite-on-bite jumbo biopsy for sampling of subepithelial lesions.
    Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Ramai D; Ofosu A; Muscatiello N; Mangiavillano B; Lamonaca L; Lisotti A; Fusaroli P; Gkolfakis P; Stasi E; Samanta J; Dhar J; Cotsoglou C; Castillo JL; Antonini F
    Dig Liver Dis; 2022 May; 54(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 35264310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy.
    Li Z; Liu W; Xu X; Li P
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2022 Sep; 56(8):668-678. PubMed ID: 35470294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Flumignan VK; Najdawai F; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul; 92(1):108-119.e3. PubMed ID: 32105712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic yield of endoscopic and EUS-guided biopsy techniques in subepithelial lesions of the upper gastro-intestinal tract: a systematic review.
    Verloop CA; Goos JAC; Bruno MJ; Quispel R; van Driel LMJW; Hol L
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38360118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Chen YI; Chatterjee A; Berger R; Kanber Y; Wyse J; Lam E; Gan I; Auger M; Kenshil S; Telford J; Donnellan F; Quinlan J; Lutzak G; Alshamsi F; Parent J; Waschke K; Alghamdi A; Barkun J; Metrakos P; Chaudhury P; Martel M; Dorreen A; Candido K; Miller C; Adam V; Barkun A; Zogopoulos G; Wong C
    Endoscopy; 2022 Jan; 54(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 33506455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy was not more cost-effective than fine-needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation in gastrointestinal lesions diagnosis.
    Sbeit W; Khoury T
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Aug; 49(8):944-947. PubMed ID: 33973746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
    Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center.
    Liu Y; Xiong D; Zhao Y; Meng Z; Wu X; Jiang Q; Wang Q; Wu D; Zhang S; Feng Y; Yang A
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023; 58(10):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 37114616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Hathorn KE; Madruga-Neto AC; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
    Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration compared to endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle biopsy: diagnostic yield and the value of onsite cytopathological assessment.
    Khan MA; Grimm IS; Ali B; Nollan R; Tombazzi C; Ismail MK; Baron TH
    Endosc Int Open; 2017 May; 5(5):E363-E375. PubMed ID: 28497108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between two types of needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine aspiration biopsy of pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal masses.
    Alkhateeb K; Lee BB; Alatassi H; Sanders MA; Omer EM; McClave SA; Fraig M
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Mar; 48(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 31850666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration
    Levine I; Trindade AJ
    World J Gastroenterol; 2021 Jul; 27(26):4194-4207. PubMed ID: 34326619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic performance and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy for gallbladder lesions.
    Kuraishi Y; Hara K; Haba S; Kuwahara T; Okuno N; Yanaidani T; Ishikawa S; Yasuda T; Yamada M; Fukui T; Mizuno N
    Dig Endosc; 2024 Feb; 36(2):206-214. PubMed ID: 37186389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.