123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37591614)
1. Prostagram magnetic resonance imaging in a screening population: Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System or Likert?
Mayor N; Eldred-Evans D; Tam H; Sokhi H; Padhani AR; Connor MJ; Price D; Gammon M; Klimowska-Nassar N; Burak P; Day E; Winkler M; Fiorentino F; Shah T; Ahmed HU
BJU Int; 2024 Jan; 133(1):112-117. PubMed ID: 37591614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Likert vs PI-RADS v2: a comparison of two radiological scoring systems for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Khoo CC; Eldred-Evans D; Peters M; Bertoncelli Tanaka M; Noureldin M; Miah S; Shah T; Connor MJ; Reddy D; Clark M; Lakhani A; Rockall A; Hosking-Jervis F; Cullen E; Arya M; Hrouda D; Qazi H; Winkler M; Tam H; Ahmed HU
BJU Int; 2020 Jan; 125(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 31599113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An Evaluation of Screening Pathways Using a Combination of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-specific Antigen: Results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM Study.
Eldred-Evans D; Tam H; Sokhi H; Padhani AR; Connor M; Price D; Gammon M; Klimowska-Nassar N; Burak P; Day E; Winkler M; Fiorentino F; Ahmed HU
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Jun; 6(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 37080821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and qualitative in-house categorization system in detection of prostate cancer.
Gaur S; Harmon S; Mehralivand S; Bednarova S; Calio BP; Sugano D; Sidana A; Merino MJ; Pinto PA; Wood BJ; Shih JH; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1326-1335. PubMed ID: 29603833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection.
Mertan FV; Greer MD; Shih JH; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Muthigi A; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):690-6. PubMed ID: 27101772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic Performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-analysis.
Woo S; Suh CH; Kim SY; Cho JY; Kim SH
Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 28196723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of PI-RADS Version 2 for Prediction of Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With Gleason Score 6.
Song W; Bang SH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Kim CK; Lee HM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):281-287. PubMed ID: 29550198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Likert and PI-RADS version 2 MRI scoring systems for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Zawaideh JP; Sala E; Pantelidou M; Shaida N; Koo B; Caglic I; Warren AY; Carmisciano L; Saeb-Parsy K; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Barrett T
Br J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 93(1112):20200298. PubMed ID: 32479105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Population-Based Prostate Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Ultrasonography: The IP1-PROSTAGRAM Study.
Eldred-Evans D; Burak P; Connor MJ; Day E; Evans M; Fiorentino F; Gammon M; Hosking-Jervis F; Klimowska-Nassar N; McGuire W; Padhani AR; Prevost AT; Price D; Sokhi H; Tam H; Winkler M; Ahmed HU
JAMA Oncol; 2021 Mar; 7(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 33570542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System versions 1 and 2 for the Detection of Peripheral Zone Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Cancers.
Krishna S; McInnes M; Lim C; Lim R; Hakim SW; Flood TA; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):W365-W373. PubMed ID: 28981356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Audit of cancer yields after prostate MRI using both the PI-RADS version 2 and Likert scoring systems.
Sokhi HK; Wilson A; Pindoria N; McNamara C; Padhani AR; Meer Z; Pope A
Clin Radiol; 2022 Jul; 77(7):541-547. PubMed ID: 35570157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier Relates More Strongly to Gleason Grade Group Than Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies.
Martin DT; Ghabili K; Levi A; Humphrey PA; Sprenkle PC
Urology; 2019 Mar; 125():64-72. PubMed ID: 30552940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System and Likert Scoring System: Multiparametric MR Imaging Validation Study to Screen Patients for Initial Biopsy.
Renard-Penna R; Mozer P; Cornud F; Barry-Delongchamps N; Bruguière E; Portalez D; Malavaud B
Radiology; 2015 May; 275(2):458-68. PubMed ID: 25599415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, on MRI Diagnosis for Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer.
Matsuoka Y; Ishioka J; Tanaka H; Kimura T; Yoshida S; Saito K; Fujii Y; Kihara K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):W76-W84. PubMed ID: 28570124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, Assessment Categories and Pathologic Outcomes in Patients With Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed at Biopsy.
Lim CS; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Breau RH; Morash C; Thornhill RE; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 28267359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of clinical parameters and MRI with PI-RADS
Lim B; Choi SY; Kyung YS; You D; Jeong IG; Hong JH; Ahn H; Kim CS
Scand J Urol; 2021 Feb; 55(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 33349092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) scoring in a transperineal prostate biopsy setting.
Grey AD; Chana MS; Popert R; Wolfe K; Liyanage SH; Acher PL
BJU Int; 2015 May; 115(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 25041307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of different thresholds of PSA density for risk stratification of PI-RADSv2.1 categories on prostate MRI.
Girometti R; Giannarini G; Panebianco V; Maresca S; Cereser L; De Martino M; Pizzolitto S; Pecoraro M; Ficarra V; Zuiani C; Valotto C
Br J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 95(1131):20210886. PubMed ID: 34762506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combining Prostate Health Index density, magnetic resonance imaging and prior negative biopsy status to improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Druskin SC; Tosoian JJ; Young A; Collica S; Srivastava A; Ghabili K; Macura KJ; Carter HB; Partin AW; Sokoll LJ; Ross AE; Pavlovich CP
BJU Int; 2018 Apr; 121(4):619-626. PubMed ID: 29232037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
