These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37591814)

  • 1. Influence of interdental spaces and the palate on the accuracy of maxillary scans acquired using different intraoral scanners.
    Akl MA; Daifallah K; Pérez-Barquero JA; Barmak AB; Wee AG; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):125-134. PubMed ID: 37591814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of occlusal collision corrections completed by two intraoral scanners or a dental design program on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship.
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Yilmaz B; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):191-203. PubMed ID: 37365066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship at centric relation position recorded by using 3 different intraoral scanners with or without an optical jaw tracking system: An in vivo pilot study.
    Revilla-León M; Fernández-Estevan L; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Pérez-Barquero JA
    J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104478. PubMed ID: 36889536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study.
    Vag J; Stevens CD; Badahman MH; Ludlow M; Sharp M; Brenes C; Mennito A; Renne W
    J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104764. PubMed ID: 37898433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of different tooth preparation finishing procedures and immediate dentin sealing on the scanning accuracy of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M; Cascos-Sánchez R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Gómez-Polo M
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104431. PubMed ID: 36682722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
    Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study.
    Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M; Jiang P; Sadeghpour M; Piedra-Cascón W; Zandinejad A; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Sep; 124(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 31864638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of the Number of Teeth and Location of the Virtual Occlusal Record on the Accuracy of the Maxillo-Mandibular Relationship Obtained by Using An Intraoral Scanner.
    Revilla-León M; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Barmak AB; Att W; Kois JC
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):253-258. PubMed ID: 35448911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans.
    Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scanning accuracy and scanning area discrepancies of intraoral digital scans acquired at varying scanning distances and angulations among 4 different intraoral scanners.
    Button H; Kois JC; Barmak AB; Zeitler JM; Rutkunas V; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Nov; 132(5):1044-1060. PubMed ID: 36872156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of arch location and scanning pattern on the scanning accuracy, scanning time, and number of photograms of complete-arch intraoral digital implant scans.
    Gómez-Polo M; Cascos R; Ortega R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jun; 34(6):591-601. PubMed ID: 37052054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner.
    Revilla-León M; Young K; Sicilia E; Cho SH; Kois JC
    J Dent; 2022 May; 120():104114. PubMed ID: 35358659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner.
    Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 31860144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in maxillomandibular relationship recorded at centric relation when using a conventional method, four intraoral scanners, and a jaw tracking system: A clinical study.
    Revilla-León M; Agustín-Panadero R; Zeitler JM; Barmak AB; Yilmaz B; Kois JC; Pérez-Barquero JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Nov; 132(5):964-972. PubMed ID: 36682896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of scan extension and starting quadrant on the accuracy of four intraoral scanners for fabricating tooth-supported crowns.
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Barmak AB; Yilmaz B; Kois JC; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38641480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
    Diker B; Tak Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of maximum intercuspal position located by using four intraoral scanners and an artificial intelligence-based program.
    Revilla-León M; Fernández-Estevan L; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38604907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of pulp chamber depth on the accuracy of endocrown scans made with different intraoral scanners versus an industrial scanner: An in vitro study.
    Gurpinar B; Tak O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):430-437. PubMed ID: 33309210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of apical finish line location of tooth preparations on the scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners with various focal lengths and scanning technologies.
    Revilla-León M; Fry E; Zeitler JM; Li J; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Pérez-Barquero JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39153939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.