140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37592393)
1. Reviewing FIGO 2018 cervical cancer staging.
Soares LC; de Souza RJ; Oliveira MAP
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Dec; 102(12):1757-1758. PubMed ID: 37592393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel prognostic nomogram utilizing the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer: A large multicenter study.
Tang X; Guo C; Liu S; Guo J; Hua K; Qiu J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2021 Oct; 155(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 33587753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revised FIGO Staging for Cervical Cancer - A New Role for MRI.
Merz J; Bossart M; Bamberg F; Eisenblaetter M
Rofo; 2020 Oct; 192(10):937-944. PubMed ID: 32731266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical Cancer: 2018 Revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging System and the Role of Imaging.
Saleh M; Virarkar M; Javadi S; Elsherif SB; de Castro Faria S; Bhosale P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 May; 214(5):1182-1195. PubMed ID: 32182097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [FIGO 2018 staging of cervical cancer and related issues].
Wang JD; Kong WM; Jiang H
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 42(2):94-98. PubMed ID: 32135641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Arguments for a magnetic resonance imaging-assisted FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
Narayan K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(4):573-82. PubMed ID: 16014109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oncologic outcomes in the era of modern radiation therapy using FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer.
Brodeur MN; Dejean R; Beauchemin MC; Samouëlian V; Cormier B; Bacha OM; Warkus T; Barkati M
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):277-283. PubMed ID: 34059350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Should we modify the current FIGO staging system for early-stage cervical cancer?
Petignat P; Loubeyre P
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2008 Jul; 8(7):1015-7. PubMed ID: 18588447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The prognostic role of horizontal and circumferential tumor extent in cervical cancer: Implications for the 2019 FIGO staging system.
Zyla RE; Gien LT; Vicus D; Olkhov-Mitsel E; Mirkovic J; Nofech-Mozes S; Djordjevic B; Parra-Herran C
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 158(2):266-272. PubMed ID: 32471646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prognostic model using FIGO 2018 staging and MRI-derived tumor volume to predict long-term outcomes in patients with uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma who received definitive radiotherapy.
Zang L; Chen Q; Lin A; Chen J; Zhang X; Fang Y; Wang M
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 21(1):210. PubMed ID: 37475053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines.
Wright JD; Matsuo K; Huang Y; Tergas AI; Hou JY; Khoury-Collado F; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 134(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 31188324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Invited Commentary: FIGO Staging Classification for Cervical Cancer-Behold the Big Picture.
Javitt MC
Radiographics; 2020 Oct; 40(6):1823-1824. PubMed ID: 32955401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Is the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer more prognostic than the 2009 FIGO staging system for women previously staged as IB disease?
Ayhan A; Aslan K; Bulut AN; Akilli H; Öz M; Haberal A; Meydanli MM
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():209-214. PubMed ID: 31325847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Management of cervical cancer and surgical-pathological staging (SPS). Report of our clinical case series.
Onnis A; Marchetti M; Maggino T; Cascio A; Cerri G; Dipasquale C; Meneghello E; Romagnolo C; Rozzo ML
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1988; 9(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 3383889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical staging versus operative staging in cervical cancer.
Maggino T; Bonetto F; Catapano P; Franco F; Valente S; Marchesoni D
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 1983; 10(4):201-4. PubMed ID: 6671323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study.
Zeng J; Qu P; Hu Y; Sun P; Qi J; Zhao G; Gao Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Apr; 99(16):e19714. PubMed ID: 32311956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interobserver agreement and prognostic impact for MRI-based 2018 FIGO staging parameters in uterine cervical cancer.
Wagner-Larsen KS; Lura N; Salvesen Ø; Halle MK; Forsse D; Trovik J; Smit N; Krakstad C; Haldorsen IS
Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):6444-6455. PubMed ID: 35332408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative platelet count improves the prognostic prediction of the FIGO staging system for operable cervical cancer patients.
Zheng RR; Huang XX; Jin C; Zhuang XX; Ye LC; Zheng FY; Lin F
Clin Chim Acta; 2017 Oct; 473():198-203. PubMed ID: 27836106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System.
Liu X; Wang W; Hu K; Zhang F; Hou X; Yan J; Meng Q; Zhou Z; Miao Z; Guan H; Ma J; Shen J; Zhen H; Wang W
Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):362. PubMed ID: 31941966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FIGO staging of gynecologic cancer. 1994-1997 FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Pecorelli S; Benedet JL; Creasman WT; Shepherd JH
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1999 Jan; 64(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 10190664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
