These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37593155)

  • 1. Safety and efficacy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
    Chandan S; Bapaye J; Khan SR; Mohan BP; Ramai D; Dahiya DS; Bilal M; Draganov PV; Othman MO; Rodriguez Sánchez J; Kochhar GS
    Endosc Int Open; 2023 Aug; 11(8):E768-E777. PubMed ID: 37593155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy and histologic accuracy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large (>20 mm) colorectal polyps: a comparative review and meta-analysis.
    Chandan S; Khan SR; Kumar A; Mohan BP; Ramai D; Kassab LL; Draganov PV; Othman MO; Kochhar GS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Sep; 94(3):471-482.e9. PubMed ID: 33385463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Higher rate of en bloc resection with underwater than conventional endoscopic mucosal resection: A meta-analysis.
    Tziatzios G; Gkolfakis P; Triantafyllou K; Fuccio L; Facciorusso A; Papanikolaou IS; Antonelli G; Nagl S; Ebigbo A; Probst A; Hassan C; Messmann H
    Dig Liver Dis; 2021 Aug; 53(8):958-964. PubMed ID: 34059445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Underwater
    Ni DQ; Lu YP; Liu XQ; Gao LY; Huang X
    World J Clin Cases; 2020 Oct; 8(20):4826-4837. PubMed ID: 33195650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting
    Zhang XQ; Sang JZ; Xu L; Mao XL; Li B; Zhu WL; Yang XY; Yu CH
    World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 28(45):6397-6409. PubMed ID: 36533110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Lim XC; Nistala KRY; Ng CH; Lin SY; Tan DJH; Ho KY; Chong CS; Muthiah M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2021 Jul; 27(25):3925-3939. PubMed ID: 34321855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative efficacy and safety of resection techniques for treating 6 to 20mm, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Tziatzios G; Papaefthymiou A; Facciorusso A; Papanikolaou IS; Antonelli G; Marco S; Frazzoni L; Fuccio L; Paraskeva KD; Hassan C; Repici A; Sharma P; Rex DK; Triantafyllou K; Messmann H; Gkolfakis P
    Dig Liver Dis; 2023 Jul; 55(7):856-864. PubMed ID: 36336608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Underwater vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection in the management of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kamal F; Khan MA; Lee-Smith W; Khan Z; Sharma S; Tombazzi C; Ahmad D; Ismail MK; Howden CW; Binmoeller KF
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Oct; 8(10):E1264-E1272. PubMed ID: 33015327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of colon polyps superior to conventional techniques? A network analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal dissection.
    Tan DJH; Ng CH; Lim XC; Lim WH; Yuen LZH; Koh JH; Nistala KRY; Ho KY; Chong CS; Muthiah MD
    Endosc Int Open; 2022 Jan; 10(1):E154-E162. PubMed ID: 35047346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sundaram S; Seth V; Jearth V; Giri S
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2023 May; 115(5):225-233. PubMed ID: 36148677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection of Sessile Serrated Polyps 10 mm or Larger: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Thoguluva Chandrasekar V; Aziz M; Patel HK; Sidhu N; Duvvuri A; Dasari C; Kennedy KF; Ashwath A; Spadaccini M; Desai M; Jegadeesan R; Sathyamurthy A; Vennalaganti P; Kohli D; Hassan C; Pellise M; Repici A; Sharma P; Bourke MJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Oct; 18(11):2448-2455.e3. PubMed ID: 31786330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Chowdhury AR; Kim JS; Xu M; Tom C; Narala R; Kong N; Lee H; Vazquez A; Sahakian A; Phan J; Buxbaum J
    Endosc Int Open; 2023 Oct; 11(10):E935-E942. PubMed ID: 37818454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Garg R; Singh A; Aggarwal M; Bhalla J; Mohan BP; Burke C; Rustagi T; Chahal P
    Clin Endosc; 2021 May; 54(3):379-389. PubMed ID: 33910271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anchoring endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial.
    Oh CK; Cho YS; Lee SH; Lee BI
    Endoscopy; 2023 Feb; 55(2):158-164. PubMed ID: 35750321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness and safety of the different endoscopic resection methods for 10- to 20-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and pooled analysis.
    Yuan X; Gao H; Liu C; Cui H; Zhang Z; Xie J; Lu H; Xu L
    Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2021; 27(6):331-341. PubMed ID: 34643573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cold Versus Hot Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Sessile Serrated Colorectal Polyps ≥10 mm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Malik TF; Mohan BP; Deliwala S; Kassab LL; Chandan S; Sharma NR; Adler DG
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2024 Oct; 58(9):889-895. PubMed ID: 38019045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy and Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in Colorectal Polyp Removal: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Niu C; Zhang J; Joshi U; Elkhapery A; Boppana HK; Okolo PI
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2025 Jan; 59(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 39145841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of underwater and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for removing sessile colorectal polyps: a propensity-score matched cohort study.
    Chien HC; Uedo N; Hsieh PH
    Endosc Int Open; 2019 Nov; 7(11):E1528-E1536. PubMed ID: 31681832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    de Souza MHG; do Espirito Santo PA; Maluf-Filho F; Lenz L
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):208. PubMed ID: 37552342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a meta-analysis.
    Li P; Ma B; Gong S; Zhang X; Li W
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):3003-3013. PubMed ID: 32577813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.