These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37594569)

  • 1. Similarities of SNARC, cognitive Simon, and visuomotor Simon effects in terms of response time distributions, hand-stimulus proximity, and temporal dynamics.
    Yan L; Ma Y; Yang W; Xiang X; Nan W
    Psychol Res; 2024 Mar; 88(2):607-620. PubMed ID: 37594569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect?
    Mapelli D; Rusconi E; Umiltà C
    Cognition; 2003 Jul; 88(3):B1-10. PubMed ID: 12804817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two processing stages of the SNARC effect.
    Nan W; Yan L; Yang G; Liu X; Fu S
    Psychol Res; 2022 Mar; 86(2):375-385. PubMed ID: 33847782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The SNARC effect occurs in the response-selection stage.
    Yan L; Yang G; Nan W; Liu X; Fu S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Apr; 215():103292. PubMed ID: 33740617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of Number Location on the SNARC Effect: Evidence From the Processing of Rotated Traditional Chinese Numerical Words.
    Wang Z; Zhu X; Jiang Y
    Iperception; 2020; 11(2):2041669520917169. PubMed ID: 32284844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of different spatial representations on the SNARC effect for letters: Electrophysiological evidence.
    Shen J; He H; Wu B; Zhou J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Nov; 76(11):2613-2628. PubMed ID: 37021368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The cognitive mechanisms of the SNARC effect: an individual differences approach.
    Viarouge A; Hubbard EM; McCandliss BD
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e95756. PubMed ID: 24760048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of number-space associations: SNARC effects and spatial attention in 7- to 11-year-olds.
    Pan Y; Han X; Mei G; Bai X; Chen Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212204. PubMed ID: 30861008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of cognitive control in the SNARC effect: A review.
    Zhang P; Cao B; Li F
    Psych J; 2022 Dec; 11(6):792-803. PubMed ID: 35975319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial-numerical associations of manual response codes are strongly asymmetrical.
    Richter M; Wühr P
    Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105538. PubMed ID: 37413698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grammatical number elicits SNARC and MARC effects as a function of task demands.
    Roettger TB; Domahs F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1231-48. PubMed ID: 25384199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No fingers, no SNARC? Neither the finger counting starting hand, nor its stability robustly affect the SNARC effect.
    Hohol M; Wołoszyn K; Cipora K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Oct; 230():103765. PubMed ID: 36242923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time course of the Simon effect in pointing movements for horizontal, vertical, and acoustic stimuli: evidence for a common mechanism.
    Buetti S; Kerzel D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):420-8. PubMed ID: 18930170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interaction mechanism between location and sequence in letter cognition.
    Wang Q; An B; Yue H; Tao W; Shi W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jun; 217():103329. PubMed ID: 33984573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SNARC meets SPARC in fMRI--Interdependence of compatibility effects depends on semantic content.
    Weis T; Estner B; Krick CM; Reith W; Lachmann T
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Oct; 77():331-8. PubMed ID: 26382748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Approach and avoidance movements are unaffected by cognitive conflict: a comparison of the Simon effect and stimulus-response compatibility.
    Kerzel D; Buetti S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):456-61. PubMed ID: 22454332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cultural factors weaken but do not reverse left-to-right spatial biases in numerosity processing: Data from Arabic and English monoliterates and Arabic-English biliterates.
    Lopiccolo D; Chang CB
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261146. PubMed ID: 34914756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.