These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37595460)

  • 1. Novel integrated modelling based on multiplicative long short-term memory (mLSTM) deep learning model and ensemble multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) models for mapping flood risk.
    Mohammadifar A; Gholami H; Golzari S
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Nov; 345():118838. PubMed ID: 37595460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coastal Flood risk assessment using ensemble multi-criteria decision-making with machine learning approaches.
    Asiri MM; Aldehim G; Alruwais N; Allafi R; Alzahrani I; Nouri AM; Assiri M; Ahmed NA
    Environ Res; 2024 Mar; 245():118042. PubMed ID: 38160971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AHP and TOPSIS based flood risk assessment- a case study of the Navsari City, Gujarat, India.
    Pathan AI; Girish Agnihotri P; Said S; Patel D
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Jun; 194(7):509. PubMed ID: 35713716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modelling of GIS-based TOPSIS, VIKOR, and EDAS techniques in the Sub-Himalayan foothills region of Eastern India.
    Mitra R; Das J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(6):16036-16067. PubMed ID: 36180798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modelling flood susceptibility based on deep learning coupling with ensemble learning models.
    Li Y; Hong H
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jan; 325(Pt A):116450. PubMed ID: 36228397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrating machine learning and geospatial data analysis for comprehensive flood hazard assessment.
    Singha C; Rana VK; Pham QB; Nguyen DC; Łupikasza E
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jul; 31(35):48497-48522. PubMed ID: 39030454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flood risk mapping and analysis using an integrated framework of machine learning models and analytic hierarchy process.
    Bui QD; Luu C; Mai SH; Ha HT; Ta HT; Pham BT
    Risk Anal; 2023 Jul; 43(7):1478-1495. PubMed ID: 36088657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpretability of simple RNN and GRU deep learning models used to map land susceptibility to gully erosion.
    Gholami H; Mohammadifar A; Golzari S; Song Y; Pradhan B
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 904():166960. PubMed ID: 37696396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of vulnerability to flood risk in the Padma River Basin using hydro-morphometric modeling and flood susceptibility mapping.
    Abrar MF; Iman YE; Mustak MB; Pal SK
    Environ Monit Assess; 2024 Jun; 196(7):661. PubMed ID: 38918209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How far spatial resolution affects the ensemble machine learning based flood susceptibility prediction in data sparse region.
    Saha TK; Pal S; Talukdar S; Debanshi S; Khatun R; Singha P; Mandal I
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Nov; 297():113344. PubMed ID: 34314957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flood vulnerability mapping and urban sprawl suitability using FR, LR, and SVM models.
    Youssef AM; Pourghasemi HR; Mahdi AM; Matar SS
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(6):16081-16105. PubMed ID: 36178648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficiency evaluation of low impact development practices on urban flood risk.
    Ayoubi Ayoublu S; Vafakhah M; Pourghasemi HR
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Apr; 356():120467. PubMed ID: 38484592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stacking- and voting-based ensemble deep learning models (SEDL and VEDL) and active learning (AL) for mapping land subsidence.
    Mohammadifar A; Gholami H; Golzari S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(10):26580-26595. PubMed ID: 36369445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel flood risk mapping approach with machine learning considering geomorphic and socio-economic vulnerability dimensions.
    Deroliya P; Ghosh M; Mohanty MP; Ghosh S; Rao KHVD; Karmakar S
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Dec; 851(Pt 1):158002. PubMed ID: 35985595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis for settlement areas: a case study in Canik.
    Kilicoglu C
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(24):35746-35759. PubMed ID: 35060034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of genetic algorithm in optimization parallel ensemble-based machine learning algorithms to flood susceptibility mapping using radar satellite imagery.
    Razavi-Termeh SV; Sadeghi-Niaraki A; Seo M; Choi SM
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 May; 873():162285. PubMed ID: 36801341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Basin-wide flood depth and exposure mapping from SAR images and machine learning models.
    Hao C; Yunus AP; Siva Subramanian S; Avtar R
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Nov; 297():113367. PubMed ID: 34314958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multi-hazard spatial modeling via ensembles of machine learning and meta-heuristic techniques.
    Bordbar M; Aghamohammadi H; Pourghasemi HR; Azizi Z
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jan; 12(1):1451. PubMed ID: 35087111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of statistical methods and multi-criteria decision making to map flood hazard susceptibility in Northern Iran.
    Arabameri A; Rezaei K; Cerdà A; Conoscenti C; Kalantari Z
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Apr; 660():443-458. PubMed ID: 30640112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integration of hard and soft supervised machine learning for flood susceptibility mapping.
    Andaryani S; Nourani V; Haghighi AT; Keesstra S
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Aug; 291():112731. PubMed ID: 33962279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.