127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37595631)
1. Internet Health Resources on Nocturnal Enuresis: A Readability, Quality, and Accuracy Analysis.
Fung ACH; Lee MHL; Leung JL; Chan IHY; Wong KKY
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2024 Feb; 34(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 37595631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of readability and quality of patient education materials specific to nocturnal enuresis.
Mohile JM; Luzon JB; Agrawal G; Malhotra NR; Kan KM
J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Oct; 19(5):558.e1-558.e7. PubMed ID: 37248162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality Assessment of Online Resources for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Patients.
Clothier W; Treffalls JA; Tolbert PH; Harbin Z; Yan Q; Davies MG
Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 85():96-104. PubMed ID: 35461994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: assessing the readability and quality of online information.
Raja H; Patel K
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2023 Sep; 105(7):639-644. PubMed ID: 36374281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing comprehension of online information in the United States for third-line treatment of overactive bladder.
Werner Z; Trump T; Zaslau S; Shapiro R
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Mar; 34(3):701-705. PubMed ID: 35556151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of the quality, accuracy, and readability of patient information on polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) on the internet available in English: a cross-sectional study.
Vågenes H; Pranić SM
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2023 May; 21(1):44. PubMed ID: 37189154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient-targeted websites on overactive bladder: What are our patients reading?
Clancy AA; Hickling D; Didomizio L; Sanaee M; Shehata F; Zee R; Khalil H
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Feb; 37(2):832-841. PubMed ID: 28762549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the readability and quality of online information on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
Raja H; Almansoor ZR
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2024 Jan; 106(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 36748797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Risks Associated With Computed Tomography Scans: An Assessment of the Readability and Reliability of Online Text Available for Patient Information and Guidance.
Hemaya M; Hemaya M; Habeeb A
Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30758. PubMed ID: 36447695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of the readability and visual appearance of online patient resources for fibroadenoma.
Hutchings HA; Remesh A
PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277823. PubMed ID: 36399450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the readability and quality of online information on anosmia.
Raja H; Lodhi S
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2024 Feb; 106(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 37051757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dr Google - assessing the reliability and readability of information on general surgical procedures found via search engines.
Ramli R; Jambor MA; Kong CY
ANZ J Surg; 2023 Mar; 93(3):590-596. PubMed ID: 36716246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.
Arslan D; Tutar MS; Kozanhan B
Eur J Pediatr; 2020 Dec; 179(12):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 32894353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
Kong KA; Hu A
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality and readability of online information on plantar fasciitis and calcaneal spur.
Kaya E; Görmez S
Rheumatol Int; 2022 Nov; 42(11):1965-1972. PubMed ID: 35763090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.
Reynolds M; Hoi A; Buchanan RRC
Lupus; 2018 Oct; 27(12):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30114969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
