These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37595789)
1. Comparability of the Retinomax K-plus 3 handheld autorefractometer in quick mode versus on-table autorefractometer in standard mode. Castilla Martinez G; Tarazona Jaimes CP; Gutierrez Amoros C; Fernandez Nadal A; Romero Valero D; Escolano Serrano J; Monera Lucas CE; Martinez Toldos JJ Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed); 2023 Sep; 98(9):533-539. PubMed ID: 37595789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the refractive measurements with hand-held autorefractometer, table-mounted autorefractometer and cycloplegic retinoscopy in children. Akil H; Keskin S; Çavdarli C Korean J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 26028946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening for refractive errors in children: accuracy of the hand held refractor Retinomax to screen for astigmatism. Cordonnier M; Dramaix M Br J Ophthalmol; 1999 Feb; 83(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 10396190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the new self-contained darkroom refractive screener versus table-top autorefractor and cycloplegia retinoscopy in detecting refractive error. Wei X; Li L; Jiang L; Lu H; Huang H; Zhong D; Pan L; Wei D; Han Y; Lin H; Chen Q BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):487. PubMed ID: 38012552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of a photoscreener in detecting accommodation spasm. Demir MS; Muhafiz E Clin Exp Optom; 2022 Nov; 105(8):817-821. PubMed ID: 34751084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Cycloplegia on Refractive Error Measure in Chinese School Students. Gu F; Gao HM; Zheng X; Gu L; Huang J; Meng J; Li J; Gao L; Wang J; Zhang R; Shen J; Ying GS; Cui H Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 29(6):629-639. PubMed ID: 34766539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of cycloplegic refraction between Grand Seiko autorefractor and Retinomax autorefractor in the Vision in Preschoolers-Hyperopia in Preschoolers (VIP-HIP) Study. Ying GS; Maguire MG; Kulp MT; Ciner E; Moore B; Pistilli M; Candy R; J AAPOS; 2017 Jun; 21(3):219-223.e3. PubMed ID: 28528993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for refractive errors in children: the plusoptiX S08 and the Retinomax K-plus2 performed by a lay screener compared to cycloplegic retinoscopy. Paff T; Oudesluys-Murphy AM; Wolterbeek R; Swart-van den Berg M; de Nie JM; Tijssen E; Schalij-Delfos NE J AAPOS; 2010 Dec; 14(6):478-83. PubMed ID: 21168070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of measurements of refractive errors between the hand-held Retinomax and on-table autorefractors in cyclopleged and noncyclopleged children. Liang CL; Hung KS; Park N; Chan P; Juo SH Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 136(6):1120-8. PubMed ID: 14644224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the handheld Retinomax K-Plus2 and on-table autokeratometers in children with and without cycloplegia. Liang CL; Hung KS; Park N; Chan P; Juo SH J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):669-74. PubMed ID: 15050266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noncycloplegic Compared with Cycloplegic Refraction in a Chicago School-Aged Population. Guo X; Shakarchi AF; Block SS; Friedman DS; Repka MX; Collins ME Ophthalmology; 2022 Jul; 129(7):813-820. PubMed ID: 35245603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement Accuracy When Using Spot Vision Screener With or Without Cycloplegia in Young Adults. Tatara S; Maeda F; Ubukata H; Shiga Y; Yaoeda K Clin Ophthalmol; 2023; 17():3543-3548. PubMed ID: 38026593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rise of the Machines? Comparison of Cycloplegic Refraction Using Retinoscopy and the Retinomax K-Plus 5 in Children. Arnon R; Rozen-Knisbacher I; Yahalomi T; Stanescu N; Niazov Y; Goldberg D; Sharabi-Nov A; Mostovoy D J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2022; 59(6):380-387. PubMed ID: 35275776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comparison of Three Different Photoscreeners in Children. Teberik K; Eski MT; Kaya M; Ankarali H J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2018 Sep; 55(5):306-311. PubMed ID: 29809264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Difference of refraction values between standard autorefractometry and Plusoptix. Bogdănici CM; Săndulache CM; Vasiliu R; Obadă O Rom J Ophthalmol; 2016; 60(4):249-254. PubMed ID: 29450357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the results of four different refraction measurement devices in children with retinoscopy. Simsek M; Oral Y; Erogul O; Sabaner MC; Simsek C; Yorukoglu S Rom J Ophthalmol; 2022; 66(4):337-343. PubMed ID: 36589324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-cycloplegic screening for refractive errors in children with the hand-held autorefractor Retinomax: final results and comparison with non-cycloplegic photoscreening. Cordonnier M; Kallay O Strabismus; 2001 Jun; 9(2):59-70. PubMed ID: 11458294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cycloplegic autorefraction results in pre-school children using the Nikon Retinomax Plus and the Welch Allyn SureSight. Steele G; Ireland D; Block S Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Aug; 80(8):573-7. PubMed ID: 12917576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children. Choong YF; Chen AH; Goh PP Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 142(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 16815252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How accurate is the hand-held refractor Retinomax(R) in measuring cycloplegic refraction: a further evaluation. Cordonnier M; Dramaix M; Kallay O; de Bideran M Strabismus; 1998 Sep; 6(3):133-142. PubMed ID: 10623951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]