136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37595792)
1. Comparison of Goldmann and ORA tonometers in newly diagnosed, untreated, POAG and OHT eyes.
Sánchez-Barahona C; Bolívar G; Teus MA
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed); 2023 Sep; 98(9):528-532. PubMed ID: 37595792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer.
Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Pourjavan S
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 20853262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Latanoprost treatment differentially affects intraocular pressure readings obtained with three different tonometers.
Sánchez-Barahona C; Bolívar G; Katsanos A; Teus MA
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 97(8):e1112-e1115. PubMed ID: 31184426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ocular response analyser to assess hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in low tension, open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Shah S; Laiquzzaman M; Mantry S; Cunliffe I
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Aug; 36(6):508-13. PubMed ID: 18954311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The relationship between measurement method and corneal structure on apparent intraocular pressure in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Nessim M; Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Apr; 36(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 23253796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Goldmann applanation tonometry compared with corneal-compensated intraocular pressure in the evaluation of primary open-angle Glaucoma.
Ehrlich JR; Radcliffe NM; Shimmyo M
BMC Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 12():52. PubMed ID: 23009074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes.
Tejwani S; Devi S; Dinakaran S; Shetty R; Meshram P; Francis M; Sinha Roy A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 57(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 26968738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Corneal biomechanical properties affect Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Costin BR; Fleming GP; Weber PA; Mahmoud AM; Roberts CJ
J Glaucoma; 2014 Feb; 23(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 23603825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Corneal viscoelastic differences between pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma.
Ozkok A; Tamcelik N; Ozdamar A; Sarici AM; Cicik E
J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):740-5. PubMed ID: 24299728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by Corvis ST and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.
Ye Y; Yang Y; Fan Y; Lan M; Yu K; Yu M
J Glaucoma; 2019 Oct; 28(10):922-928. PubMed ID: 31453898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
Vandewalle E; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraocular pressure and diurnal fluctuation of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a baseline report from the LiGHT China trial cohort.
Yang Y; Zhang X; Chen Z; Wei Y; Ye Q; Fan Y; Nathwani N; Gazzard G; Yu M;
Br J Ophthalmol; 2023 Jun; 107(6):823-827. PubMed ID: 35086806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between different tonometers following intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation.
Elfwwal MM; Elbasty MK; Khattab MF; ElShazly MI
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 32(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 34472983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors influencing intermethod agreement between goldmann applanation, pascal dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometry.
Sullivan-Mee M; Lewis SE; Pensyl D; Gerhardt G; Halverson KD; Qualls C
J Glaucoma; 2013 Aug; 22(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 22407388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry.
Punjabi OS; Ho HK; Kniestedt C; Bostrom AG; Stamper RL; Lin SC
Curr Eye Res; 2006 Oct; 31(10):851-62. PubMed ID: 17050277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Corneal biomechanics and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension and controls.
Vinciguerra R; Rehman S; Vallabh NA; Batterbury M; Czanner G; Choudhary A; Cheeseman R; Elsheikh A; Willoughby CE
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 104(1):121-126. PubMed ID: 30923134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of ocular response analyzer parameters in chinese subjects with primary angle-closure and primary open-angle glaucoma.
Narayanaswamy A; Su DH; Baskaran M; Tan AC; Nongpiur ME; Htoon HM; Wong TY; Aung T
Arch Ophthalmol; 2011 Apr; 129(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 21482869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
