185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37596374)
21. A Randomized Controlled Trial To Assess and Compare the Outcomes of Two-core Prostate Biopsy Guided by Fused Magnetic Resonance and Transrectal Ultrasound Images and Traditional 12-core Systematic Biopsy.
Baco E; Rud E; Eri LM; Moen G; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Eggesbø HB; Ukimura O
Eur Urol; 2016 Jan; 69(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 25862143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The predictive value of the prostate health index vs. multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis in prostate biopsy.
Stejskal J; Adamcová V; Záleský M; Novák V; Čapoun O; Fiala V; Dolejšová O; Sedláčková H; Veselý Š; Zachoval R
World J Urol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):1889-1895. PubMed ID: 32761380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prostate Cancer Detection and Complications of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies.
Buller D; Sahl J; Staff I; Tortora J; Pinto K; McLaughlin T; Olivo Valentin L; Wagner J
Urology; 2023 Jul; 177():109-114. PubMed ID: 37059232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Systematic Template Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Comparison of Transperineal and Transrectal Approaches.
Wu S; Feldman AS; Kim MM; Lin SX; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Dahl DM; Wu CL
Urology; 2023 May; 175():151-156. PubMed ID: 36828261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy on the Risk of Upgrading in Final Pathology in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy? An European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Study.
Zattoni F; Marra G; Martini A; Kasivisvanathan V; Grummet J; Harkin T; Ploussard G; Olivier J; Chiu PK; Valerio M; Marquis A; Gontero P; Guo H; Zhuang J; Frydenberg M; Moon D; Morlacco A; Kretschmer A; Barletta F; Heidegger I; Tilki D; van den Bergh R; Dal Moro F; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Novara G; Gandaglia G;
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):621-628. PubMed ID: 36746729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. One-Stop MRI and MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: an expedited pathway for prostate cancer diagnosis.
Tafuri A; Ashrafi AN; Palmer S; Shakir A; Cacciamani GE; Iwata A; Iwata T; Cai J; Sali A; Gupta C; Medina LG; Stern MC; Duddalwar V; Aron M; Gill IS; Abreu A
World J Urol; 2020 Apr; 38(4):949-956. PubMed ID: 31175460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Transperineal magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy versus transrectal route in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wu Q; Tu X; Zhang C; Ye J; Lin T; Liu Z; Yang L; Qiu S; Bao Y; Wei Q
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2024 Jun; 27(2):212-221. PubMed ID: 37783837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Transperineal Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Combined with Standard Template Improves Prostate Cancer Detection.
Kim MM; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Harisinghani M; Feldman AS; Wu CL; Dahl DM
J Urol; 2022 Jan; 207(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 34428921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Standardized Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reporting Using the Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation Criteria and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion with Transperineal Saturation Biopsy to Select Men on Active Surveillance.
Dieffenbacher S; Nyarangi-Dix J; Giganti F; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Müller-Wolf MB; Schütz V; Gasch C; Hatiboglu G; Hauffe M; Stenzinger A; Duensing S; Schlemmer HP; Moore CM; Hohenfellner M; Radtke JP
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jan; 7(1):102-110. PubMed ID: 30878348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Evaluation of the PI-RADSv2 classification in a cohort of patients who underwent a prostate fusion biopsy.].
Rodríguez Cabello MÁ; Sanz Migueláñez JL; Méndez Rubio S; Arias Fúnez F; Garrido Abad P; Carrillo Guivernau MJ; Velasco Ruíz M; González Gordaliza C; Platas Sancho A
Arch Esp Urol; 2020 Jan; 73(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 31950917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies.
Wegelin O; Exterkate L; van der Leest M; Kummer JA; Vreuls W; de Bruin PC; Bosch JLHR; Barentsz JO; Somford DM; van Melick HHE
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):582-590. PubMed ID: 30522912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical implementation of pre-biopsy magnetic resonance imaging pathways for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Israël B; Immerzeel J; van der Leest M; Hannink G; Zámecnik P; Bomers J; Schoots IG; van Basten JP; Debruyne F; van Oort I; Sedelaar M; Barentsz J
BJU Int; 2022 Apr; 129(4):480-490. PubMed ID: 34358388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A retrospective comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer.
Di Franco CA; Jallous H; Porru D; Giliberto GL; Cebrelli T; Tinelli C; Rovereto B
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Mar; 89(1):55-59. PubMed ID: 28403597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Combining Prostate-Specific Antigen Parameters With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score Version 2.0 to Improve Its Diagnostic Accuracy.
Baruah SK; Das N; Baruah SJ; Rajeev TP; Bagchi PK; Sharma D; Phukan M
World J Oncol; 2019 Dec; 10(6):218-225. PubMed ID: 31921377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Multiparametric MRI/TRUS Fusion Prostate Biopsy: Advantages of a Transperineal Approach.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo GD; Pennisi M
Anticancer Res; 2017 Jun; 37(6):3291-3294. PubMed ID: 28551679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy of the prostate: Quality of image fusion in a clinical setting.
Schlenker B; Apfelbeck M; Buchner A; Stief C; Clevert DA
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 70(4):433-440. PubMed ID: 30347605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic Value of Cognitive-Registration Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Guided Biopsy for the Detection of Prostate Cancer after Initial Negative Biopsy.
Tomašković I; Pezelj I; Bolanča Čulo K; Novosel L; Nikles S; Tomić M; Reljić A; Katušić J; Knežević M; Pirša M; Kruslin B; Ulamec M; Ružić B
Acta Clin Croat; 2018 Oct; 57(Suppl 1):40-45. PubMed ID: 30457246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Choi YH; Kang MY; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Chang Jeong B; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e19-e25. PubMed ID: 30415878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates in patients undergoing MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy with two different software-based systems.
Hanske J; Risse Y; Roghmann F; Pucheril D; Berg S; Tully KH; von Landenberg N; Wald J; Noldus J; Brock M
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(2):227-234. PubMed ID: 34734428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Analysis of the relationship between PI-RADS scores and the pathological results of targeted biopsy based on MRI].
Wang YM; Shang JW; Dong L; Liang LH; Zhao RZ; Liang C; Wang SQ; Xia W; Cheng G; Hua LX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2023 Nov; 45(11):942-947. PubMed ID: 37968079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
