These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37597197)

  • 21. Surgical and functional outcomes of Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. Are outcomes worth it? Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    O'Connor-Cordova MA; Macías AGO; Sancen-Herrera JP; Altamirano-Lamarque F; Vargas Del Toro A; Peddinani BK; Canal-Zarate P; O'Connor-Juarez MA
    Prostate; 2023 Nov; 83(15):1395-1414. PubMed ID: 37555617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized comparison on immediate continence rates.
    Asimakopoulos AD; Topazio L; De Angelis M; Agrò EF; Pastore AL; Fuschi A; Annino F
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Jul; 33(7):2187-2196. PubMed ID: 30426256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Early continence after radical prostatectomy: A systematic review.
    Salazar A; Regis L; Planas J; Celma A; Díaz F; Gallardo I; Trilla E; Morote J
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2019 Dec; 43(10):526-535. PubMed ID: 31606163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Anterior vs. Retzius-sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: can the approach really make a difference?
    Albisinni S; Dasnoy C; Diamand R; Mjaess G; Aoun F; Esperto F; Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Roumeguere T; DE Nunzio C
    Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2022 Apr; 74(2):137-145. PubMed ID: 34714037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of the literature.
    Rocco B; Cozzi G; Spinelli MG; Coelho RF; Patel VR; Tewari A; Wiklund P; Graefen M; Mottrie A; Gaboardi F; Gill IS; Montorsi F; Artibani W; Rocco F
    Eur Urol; 2012 Nov; 62(5):779-90. PubMed ID: 22664219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anatomic and technical considerations for optimizing recovery of urinary function during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Vora AA; Dajani D; Lynch JH; Kowalczyk KJ
    Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Jan; 23(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 23169151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hood Technique for Robotic Radical Prostatectomy-Preserving Periurethral Anatomical Structures in the Space of Retzius and Sparing the Pouch of Douglas, Enabling Early Return of Continence Without Compromising Surgical Margin Rates.
    Wagaskar VG; Mittal A; Sobotka S; Ratnani P; Lantz A; Falagario UG; Martini A; Dovey Z; Treacy PJ; Pathak P; Nair S; Roy B; Chakravarty D; Lewis S; Haines K; Wiklund P; Tewari A
    Eur Urol; 2021 Aug; 80(2):213-221. PubMed ID: 33067016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The powerful impact of double-layered posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction on early recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Gondo T; Yoshioka K; Hashimoto T; Nakagami Y; Hamada R; Kashima T; Shimodaira K; Takeuchi H; Satake N; Tachibana M; Rocco B
    J Endourol; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1159-64. PubMed ID: 22471623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prospective assessment of patient reported urinary continence after radical prostatectomy.
    Wei JT; Dunn RL; Marcovich R; Montie JE; Sanda MG
    J Urol; 2000 Sep; 164(3 Pt 1):744-8. PubMed ID: 10953138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Literature review of factors affecting continence after radical prostatectomy.
    Pacik D; Fedorko M
    Saudi Med J; 2017 Jan; 38(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 28042624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: One-year Functional Outcomes in a Two-group Randomised Controlled Trial.
    Student V; Vidlar A; Grepl M; Hartmann I; Buresova E; Student V
    Eur Urol; 2017 May; 71(5):822-830. PubMed ID: 27283216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Coelho RF; Chauhan S; Orvieto MA; Sivaraman A; Palmer KJ; Coughlin G; Patel VR
    Eur Urol; 2011 Jan; 59(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 20801579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Retzius-sparing Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Facilitates Early Continence Regardless of Neurovascular Bundle Sparing.
    Liao PC; Hung SC; Hu JC; Chiu KY
    Anticancer Res; 2020 Jul; 40(7):4075-4080. PubMed ID: 32620655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based analysis of comparative outcomes.
    Carbonara U; Srinath M; Crocerossa F; Ferro M; Cantiello F; Lucarelli G; Porpiglia F; Battaglia M; Ditonno P; Autorino R
    World J Urol; 2021 Oct; 39(10):3721-3732. PubMed ID: 33843016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A simple reconstruction of the posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter and sparing of puboprostatic collar reduces the time to early continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Daouacher G; Waldén M
    J Endourol; 2014 Apr; 28(4):481-6. PubMed ID: 24456218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of Early Dorsal Venous Complex Ligation on Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Bravi CA; Gandaglia G; Mazzone E; Fossati N; Gallina A; Stabile A; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Nocera L; Rosiello G; Martini A; Pellegrino F; Cucchiara V; Dehò F; Capitanio U; Scattoni V; Salonia A; Briganti A; Montorsi F
    Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jan; 9(1):83-88. PubMed ID: 36154808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Up-to-Date Meta-Analysis.
    Xu JN; Xu ZY; Yin HM
    Front Surg; 2021; 8():738421. PubMed ID: 34660680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of postoperative urinary continence and incontinence types between conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Makino T; Naito R; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2023 Aug; 42(6):1411-1420. PubMed ID: 37096807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Posterior, Anterior, and Periurethral Surgical Reconstruction of Urinary Continence Mechanisms in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Description and Video Compilation of Commonly Performed Surgical Techniques.
    Vis AN; van der Poel HG; Ruiter AEC; Hu JC; Tewari AK; Rocco B; Patel VR; Razdan S; Nieuwenhuijzen JA
    Eur Urol; 2019 Dec; 76(6):814-822. PubMed ID: 30514568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Postoperative functional and cancer control evaluation of conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Comparison of selected cases by propensity score matching.
    Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A
    Prostate; 2023 Jun; 83(8):773-780. PubMed ID: 36879364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.