These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37597379)

  • 21. How Do Human-Driven Vehicles Avoid Pedestrians in Interactive Environments? A Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Sun S; Zhang Z; Zhang Z; Deng P; Tian K; Wei C
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Communicating Intent of Automated Vehicles to Pedestrians.
    Habibovic A; Lundgren VM; Andersson J; Klingegård M; Lagström T; Sirkka A; Fagerlönn J; Edgren C; Fredriksson R; Krupenia S; Saluäär D; Larsson P
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1336. PubMed ID: 30131737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. External Human-Machine Interfaces for Automated Vehicles in Shared Spaces: A Review of the Human-Computer Interaction Literature.
    Brill S; Payre W; Debnath A; Horan B; Birrell S
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 May; 23(9):. PubMed ID: 37177658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sharing roads with automated vehicles: A questionnaire investigation from drivers', cyclists' and pedestrians' perspectives.
    Li X; Kaye SA; Afghari AP; Oviedo-Trespalacios O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107093. PubMed ID: 37150131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pedestrian Trust in Automated Vehicles: Role of Traffic Signal and AV Driving Behavior.
    Jayaraman SK; Creech C; Tilbury DM; Yang XJ; Pradhan AK; Tsui KM; Robert LP
    Front Robot AI; 2019; 6():117. PubMed ID: 33501132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The attentional guidance and facilitating effects of group behavioral cues on individual college pedestrians' jaywalking decisions.
    Du X; Ma J; Zhang M; Wang J; Liang C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(5):733-740. PubMed ID: 38629829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The paradox of pedestrian's risk aversion.
    Hacohen S; Shoval S; Shvalb N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105518. PubMed ID: 32416278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pedestrian smartphone overuse and inattentional blindness: an observational study in Taipei, Taiwan.
    Chen PL; Pai CW
    BMC Public Health; 2018 Dec; 18(1):1342. PubMed ID: 30595132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Investigation of traffic and safety behavior of pedestrians while texting or web-surfing.
    Ropaka M; Nikolaou D; Yannis G
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(6):389-394. PubMed ID: 32500788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Senior Americans' perceptions, attitudes, and safety concerns toward Autonomous Vehicles (AVs).
    Doulabi S; Hassan HM; Li B
    J Safety Res; 2023 Feb; 84():218-231. PubMed ID: 36868650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Understanding complex traffic road scenes: The case of child-pedestrians' hazard perception.
    Meir A; Oron-Gilad T
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():111-126. PubMed ID: 32199554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Examining pedestrians' trust in automated vehicles based on attributes of trust: A qualitative study.
    Zhou S; Sun X; Wang Q; Liu B; Burnett G
    Appl Ergon; 2023 May; 109():103997. PubMed ID: 36774764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Stopping by looking: A driver-pedestrian interaction study in a coupled simulator using head-mounted displays with eye-tracking.
    Mok CS; Bazilinskyy P; de Winter J
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Nov; 105():103825. PubMed ID: 35777182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stated preference analysis of autonomous vehicle among bicyclists and pedestrians in Pittsburgh using Bayesian Networks.
    Imanishimwe D; Kumar A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107278. PubMed ID: 37683566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Autonomous vehicles and street design: Exploring the role of medians in enhancing pedestrian street crossing safety using a virtual reality experiment.
    Joo Y; Kim SN; Kim BC; Cho GH; Kim J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107092. PubMed ID: 37126970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Illegal road crossing behavior of pedestrians at overpass locations: Factors affecting gap acceptance, crossing times and overpass use.
    Demiroz YI; Onelcin P; Alver Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jul; 80():220-8. PubMed ID: 25916663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pedestrian-driver communication and decision strategies at marked crossings.
    Sucha M; Dostal D; Risser R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():41-50. PubMed ID: 28259827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Factors influencing safety perceptions of sharing roadways with autonomous vehicles among vulnerable roadway users.
    Rahman MT; Dey K; Dimitra Pyrialakou V; Das S
    J Safety Res; 2023 Jun; 85():266-277. PubMed ID: 37330876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Crossing the street in front of an autonomous vehicle: An investigation of eye contact between drivengers and vulnerable road users.
    Sahaï A; Labeye E; Caroux L; Lemercier C
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():981666. PubMed ID: 36389471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An extension of the theory of planned behavior to predict pedestrians' violating crossing behavior using structural equation modeling.
    Zhou H; Romero SB; Qin X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt B):417-424. PubMed ID: 26433568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.