181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37598153)
1. Sample size requirements are not being considered in studies developing prediction models for binary outcomes: a systematic review.
Dhiman P; Ma J; Qi C; Bullock G; Sergeant JC; Riley RD; Collins GS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Aug; 23(1):188. PubMed ID: 37598153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome.
Riley RD; Debray TPA; Collins GS; Archer L; Ensor J; van Smeden M; Snell KIE
Stat Med; 2021 Aug; 40(19):4230-4251. PubMed ID: 34031906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Developing clinical prediction models when adhering to minimum sample size recommendations: The importance of quantifying bootstrap variability in tuning parameters and predictive performance.
Martin GP; Riley RD; Collins GS; Sperrin M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Dec; 30(12):2545-2561. PubMed ID: 34623193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review.
Dhiman P; Ma J; Andaur Navarro CL; Speich B; Bullock G; Damen JAA; Hooft L; Kirtley S; Riley RD; Van Calster B; Moons KGM; Collins GS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):101. PubMed ID: 35395724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: PART II - binary and time-to-event outcomes.
Riley RD; Snell KI; Ensor J; Burke DL; Harrell FE; Moons KG; Collins GS
Stat Med; 2019 Mar; 38(7):1276-1296. PubMed ID: 30357870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adaptive sample size determination for the development of clinical prediction models.
Christodoulou E; van Smeden M; Edlinger M; Timmerman D; Wanitschek M; Steyerberg EW; Van Calster B
Diagn Progn Res; 2021 Mar; 5(1):6. PubMed ID: 33745449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A note on estimating the Cox-Snell R
Riley RD; Van Calster B; Collins GS
Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(4):859-864. PubMed ID: 33283904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.
Filges T; Sonne-Schmidt CS; Nielsen BCV
Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-107. PubMed ID: 37131395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.
Vernooij LM; van Klei WA; Moons KG; Takada T; van Waes J; Damen JA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Dec; 12(12):CD013139. PubMed ID: 34931303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model using multinomial logistic regression.
Pate A; Riley RD; Collins GS; van Smeden M; Van Calster B; Ensor J; Martin GP
Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Mar; 32(3):555-571. PubMed ID: 36660777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sample sizes of prediction model studies in prostate cancer were rarely justified and often insufficient.
Collins SD; Peek N; Riley RD; Martin GP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():53-60. PubMed ID: 33383128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A descriptive study of samples sizes used in agreement studies published in the PubMed repository.
Han O; Tan HW; Julious S; Sutton L; Jacques R; Lee E; Lewis J; Walters S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):242. PubMed ID: 36123642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Penalization and shrinkage methods produced unreliable clinical prediction models especially when sample size was small.
Riley RD; Snell KIE; Martin GP; Whittle R; Archer L; Sperrin M; Collins GS
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Apr; 132():88-96. PubMed ID: 33307188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of required sample size for external validation of risk models for binary outcomes.
Pavlou M; Qu C; Omar RZ; Seaman SR; Steyerberg EW; White IR; Ambler G
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2187-2206. PubMed ID: 33881369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a continuous outcome.
Archer L; Snell KIE; Ensor J; Hudda MT; Collins GS; Riley RD
Stat Med; 2021 Jan; 40(1):133-146. PubMed ID: 33150684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of first trimester risk prediction models for pre-eclampsia: a systematic review.
Brunelli VB; Prefumo F
BJOG; 2015 Jun; 122(7):904-14. PubMed ID: 25761437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deployment of personnel to military operations: impact on mental health and social functioning.
Bøg M; Filges T; Jørgensen AMK
Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-127. PubMed ID: 37131363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimum sample size calculations for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a time-to-event outcome.
Riley RD; Collins GS; Ensor J; Archer L; Booth S; Mozumder SI; Rutherford MJ; van Smeden M; Lambert PC; Snell KIE
Stat Med; 2022 Mar; 41(7):1280-1295. PubMed ID: 34915593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
