These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37598379)

  • 1. Deconstruction of science hegemony: discursive strategies of Chinese science communication on genetically modified foods.
    Lin J
    GM Crops Food; 2023 Dec; 14(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 37598379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. For or against genetically modified foods: Different discursive strategies in Chinese social media.
    Lin J
    Public Underst Sci; 2021 Nov; 30(8):1058-1072. PubMed ID: 33855918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deconstruction of the discourse authority of scientists in Chinese online science communication: Investigation of citizen science communicators on Chinese knowledge sharing networks.
    Yang Z
    Public Underst Sci; 2021 Nov; 30(8):993-1007. PubMed ID: 33860703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The landscape of online news regarding genetically modified foods: A cross-sectional study.
    Samuel L; Basch SI
    Nutr Health; 2023 Jun; 29(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 36330678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the agri-food biotechnology conversation: bridging science communication with science and technology studies.
    Broad GM
    Agric Human Values; 2023 Apr; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 37359839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similar Attitudes, Different Strategies: A Limited Survey of the Discourse Strategies to Oppose Genetically Modified Organisms Conspiracy Theories by Chinese Scientist Communicators and Citizen Communicators on Zhihu.
    Yang Z
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():926098. PubMed ID: 35936262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A crisis of authority in scientific discourse.
    Nichols MD; Petzold AM
    Cult Stud Sci Educ; 2021; 16(2):643-650. PubMed ID: 33456626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Greenpeace and the online genetically modified food debate in the UK: The role of science and scientific evidence in 'environmental representation'.
    Price C
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 May; 32(4):489-503. PubMed ID: 36519397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advocacy Science: Explaining the Term with Case Studies from Biotechnology.
    Gerasimova K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):455-477. PubMed ID: 28597219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientists vs laypeople: How genetically modified food is discussed on a Chinese Q&A website.
    Liang J; Liu X; Zhang W
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Nov; 28(8):991-1004. PubMed ID: 31547775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The discursive construction of corporate identity in the corporate social responsibility reports: A case study of Starbucks.
    Li X
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():940541. PubMed ID: 36092082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attitudes of agricultural scientists in Indonesia towards genetically modified foods.
    Februhartanty J; Widyastuti TN; Iswarawanti DN
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2007; 16(2):375-80. PubMed ID: 17468097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is Opposition to Genetically Modified Food "Morally Absolutist"? A Consequence-Based Perspective.
    Royzman EB; Cusimano C; Metas S; Leeman RF
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Mar; 15(2):250-272. PubMed ID: 31877108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From Mind to Mouth: Understanding Active Publics in China and Their Communicative Behaviors on GM Foods.
    Chon MG; Xu L; Liu J; Kim JN; Kim J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 36612899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hypothetical link between infertility and genetically modified food.
    Gao M; Li B; Yuan W; Zhao L; Zhang X
    Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric; 2014; 6(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 25342149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of Knowledge and Attitudes on Genetically Modified Foods Among Students Studying Life Sciences.
    Rathod D; Hedaoo RP
    Cureus; 2022 Dec; 14(12):e32744. PubMed ID: 36686112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. It will be a disaster! How people protest against things which have not yet happened.
    Quet M
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 Feb; 24(2):210-24. PubMed ID: 24844767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GM foods and the misperception of risk perception.
    Gaskell G; Allum N; Wagner W; Kronberger N; Torgersen H; Hampel J; Bardes J
    Risk Anal; 2004 Feb; 24(1):185-94. PubMed ID: 15028010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microblog credibility indicators regarding misinformation of genetically modified food on Weibo.
    Ji J; Chao N; Wei S; Barnett GA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252392. PubMed ID: 34061876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readiness of adolescents to use genetically modified organisms according to their knowledge and emotional attitude towards GMOs.
    Lachowski S; Jurkiewicz A; Choina P; Florek-Łuszczki M; Buczaj A; Goździewska M
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2017 Jun; 24(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 28664693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.