127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37599646)
21. Implementation approaches and barriers for rule-based and machine learning-based sepsis risk prediction tools: a qualitative study.
Joshi M; Mecklai K; Rozenblum R; Samal L
JAMIA Open; 2022 Jul; 5(2):ooac022. PubMed ID: 35474719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Computerized Clinical Decision Support to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism Among Hospitalized Patients: Proximal Outcomes from a Multiyear Quality Improvement Project.
Amland RC; Dean BB; Yu H; Ryan H; Orsund T; Hackman JL; Roberts SR
J Healthc Qual; 2015; 37(4):221-31. PubMed ID: 26151096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sepsis in Complex Patients in the Emergency Department: Time to Recognition and Therapy in Pediatric Patients With High-Risk Conditions.
Fesnak S; Abbadessa MK; Hayes K; Ostapenko S; Lavelle J; Zorc JJ; Balamuth F
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2020 Feb; 36(2):63-65. PubMed ID: 31929394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical Decision Support Principles for Quality Improvement and Research.
Molloy MJ; Muthu N; Orenstein EW; Shelov E; Luo BT
Hosp Pediatr; 2024 Apr; 14(4):e219-e224. PubMed ID: 38545665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Development, implementation, and impact of an automated early warning and response system for sepsis.
Umscheid CA; Betesh J; VanZandbergen C; Hanish A; Tait G; Mikkelsen ME; French B; Fuchs BD
J Hosp Med; 2015 Jan; 10(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 25263548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Non-Interruptive Clinical Decision Support to Improve Perioperative Electronic Positive Patient Identification.
Steitz BD; Li G; Wright A; Dunworth B; Freundlich RE; Wanderer JP
J Med Syst; 2022 Jan; 46(3):15. PubMed ID: 35079867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Testing modes of computerized sepsis alert notification delivery systems.
Dziadzko MA; Harrison AM; Tiong IC; Pickering BW; Moreno Franco P; Herasevich V
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Dec; 16(1):156. PubMed ID: 27938401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical Decision Support in the PICU: Implications for Design and Evaluation.
Dziorny AC; Heneghan JA; Bhat MA; Karavite DJ; Sanchez-Pinto LN; McArthur J; Muthu N;
Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2022 Aug; 23(8):e392-e396. PubMed ID: 35481951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical Decision Support for Early Recognition of Sepsis.
Amland RC; Hahn-Cover KE
Am J Med Qual; 2016; 31(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 25385815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Between-hospital variation in clinical decision support availability for common inpatient pediatric conditions: Results of a national Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings (PRĪS) Network survey.
Carr LH; Oluwalade B; Muthu N; Beus J; Bonafide CP
J Hosp Med; 2023 Jul; 18(7):617-621. PubMed ID: 37340560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Nature and Variability of Automated Practice Alerts Derived from Electronic Health Records in a U.S. Nationwide Critical Care Research Network.
Benthin C; Pannu S; Khan A; Gong M;
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1784-1788. PubMed ID: 27404288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of Test Performance and Clinical Time Zero for an Electronic Health Record Embedded Severe Sepsis Alert.
Rolnick J; Downing NL; Shepard J; Chu W; Tam J; Wessels A; Li R; Dietrich B; Rudy M; Castaneda L; Shieh L
Appl Clin Inform; 2016; 7(2):560-72. PubMed ID: 27437061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.
Warttig S; Alderson P; Evans DJ; Lewis SR; Kourbeti IS; Smith AF
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 6(6):CD012404. PubMed ID: 29938790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Best practices for preventing malfunctions in rule-based clinical decision support alerts and reminders: Results of a Delphi study.
Wright A; Ash JS; Aaron S; Ai A; Hickman TT; Wiesen JF; Galanter W; McCoy AB; Schreiber R; Longhurst CA; Sittig DF
Int J Med Inform; 2018 Oct; 118():78-85. PubMed ID: 30153926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Applying A/B Testing to Clinical Decision Support: Rapid Randomized Controlled Trials.
Austrian J; Mendoza F; Szerencsy A; Fenelon L; Horwitz LI; Jones S; Kuznetsova M; Mann DM
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Apr; 23(4):e16651. PubMed ID: 33835035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Design and Implementation of a Pediatric ICU Acuity Scoring Tool as Clinical Decision Support.
Shelov E; Muthu N; Wolfe H; Traynor D; Craig N; Bonafide C; Nadkarni V; Davis D; Dewan M
Appl Clin Inform; 2018 Jul; 9(3):576-587. PubMed ID: 30068013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An Electronic Tool for the Evaluation and Treatment of Sepsis in the ICU: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Semler MW; Weavind L; Hooper MH; Rice TW; Gowda SS; Nadas A; Song Y; Martin JB; Bernard GR; Wheeler AP
Crit Care Med; 2015 Aug; 43(8):1595-602. PubMed ID: 25867906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Development of an Interoperable and Easily Transferable Clinical Decision Support System Deployment Platform: System Design and Development Study.
Yoo J; Lee J; Min JY; Choi SW; Kwon JM; Cho I; Lim C; Choi MY; Cha WC
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jul; 24(7):e37928. PubMed ID: 35896020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Efficient Postoperative Disposition Selection in Pediatric Otolaryngology Patients: A Novel Approach.
Lavin JM; Sawardekar A; Sohn L; Jones RC; Fusilero L; Iafelice ME; Molenda L
Laryngoscope; 2021 Jan; 131 Suppl 1():S1-S10. PubMed ID: 32438522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Design and implementation of a clinical decision support tool for primary palliative Care for Emergency Medicine (PRIM-ER).
Tan A; Durbin M; Chung FR; Rubin AL; Cuthel AM; McQuilkin JA; Modrek AS; Jamin C; Gavin N; Mann D; Swartz JL; Austrian JS; Testa PA; Hill JD; Grudzen CR;
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jan; 20(1):13. PubMed ID: 31992301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
