BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37602349)

  • 1. Effect of changing mesopic and photopic light conditions on visual functions.
    Mosayebi F; Tabatabaee SM; Kangari H; Rahmani S
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2023; 16(8):1287-1292. PubMed ID: 37602349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of Vision Following LASIK and PRK-MMC for Treatment of Myopia.
    Gao H; Miles TP; Troche R; Murdoch DM; Koefoed VF; Cason JB
    Mil Med; 2022 Aug; 187(9-10):e1051-e1058. PubMed ID: 33629728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mesopic visual acuity is less crowded.
    Pluháček F; Siderov J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 256(9):1739-1746. PubMed ID: 29808376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Contact Lens Design on Objective Visual Acuity-Based Parameters in Pre-Presbyopic Patients in Photopic and Mesopic Lighting Conditions.
    Sztrigler-Cohen O; Bromberger N; Thee Y; Lender R; Ben-Eli H
    Vision (Basel); 2023 Jun; 7(2):. PubMed ID: 37368819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High and low contrast visual acuity after artiflex phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of myopia.
    van Philips LA
    J Refract Surg; 2010 Jun; 26(6):423-9. PubMed ID: 20677728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in visual function under mesopic and photopic conditions after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation for different stages of keratoconus.
    Carballo J; Puell MC; Cuiña R; Vázquez JM; Benitez-del-Castillo JM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Mar; 39(3):393-402. PubMed ID: 23245506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Normal values for photopic and mesopic letter contrast sensitivity.
    Puell MC; Palomo C; Sánchez-Ramos C; Villena C
    J Refract Surg; 2004; 20(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 15523961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of measuring visual performance of LASIK patients under photopic and mesopic conditions.
    Tang W; Heng WJ; Lee HM; Fam HB; Lai NS
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2006 Aug; 35(8):541-6. PubMed ID: 17006581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of Mesopic Measures of Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity and Their Correlation with Rod and Cone Function in Retinitis Pigmentosa.
    Bittner AK; Ferraz MC
    Ophthalmic Res; 2020; 63(2):133-140. PubMed ID: 31805550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mesopic foveal contrast sensitivity is impaired in diabetic patients without retinopathy.
    Katz G; Levkovitch-Verbin H; Treister G; Belkin M; Ilany J; Polat U
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Dec; 248(12):1699-703. PubMed ID: 20499079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual acuity and "balanced progressive" simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Sanders E; Wagner H; Reich LN
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Sep; 34(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 18779670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast sensitivity measured by two different test methods in healthy, young adults with normal visual acuity.
    Koefoed VF; Baste V; Roumes C; Høvding G
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 93(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 25056525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Photopic and Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Function in the Presence of Glare and the Effect of Filters in Young Healthy Adults.
    Domínguez-Vicent A; Helghe E; Wahlberg Ramsay M; Venkataraman AP
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():772661. PubMed ID: 34819902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual performance of a multifocal toric soft contact lens.
    Madrid-Costa D; Tomás E; Ferrer-Blasco T; García-Lázaro S; Montés-Micó R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Nov; 89(11):1627-35. PubMed ID: 23034336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved contrast sensitivity and visual acuity after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: in-depth statistical analysis.
    Tuan KM; Liang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Feb; 32(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 16564995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Degradation of Photopic and Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Function in High Myopes With Partial Posterior Vitreous Detachment.
    Zhao J; Xiao M; Zhu Y; Gong Q; Qu J; Lu F; Hu L
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 Apr; 13(4):3. PubMed ID: 38564201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marked dissociation of photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity even in normal observers.
    Hertenstein H; Bach M; Gross NJ; Beisse F
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 254(2):373-84. PubMed ID: 25921390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study for mesopic contrast sensitivity between photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Lee JE; Choi HY; Oum BS; Lee JS
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2006; 37(4):298-303. PubMed ID: 16898390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mesopic contrast sensitivity function after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.
    Montés-Micó R; Charman WN
    J Refract Surg; 2002; 18(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11828917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determinants and standardization of mesopic visual acuity.
    Lin RJ; Ng JS; Nguyen AL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):559-65. PubMed ID: 25906409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.