These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37602506)

  • 1. The in-vitro accuracy of fiducial marker-based versus markerless registration of an intraoral scan with a cone-beam computed tomography scan in the presence of restoration artifact.
    Biun J; Dudhia R; Arora H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Nov; 34(11):1257-1266. PubMed ID: 37602506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of metal artifact reduction on the trueness of registration of a cone-beam computed tomography scan with an intraoral scan in the presence of severe restoration artifact.
    Biun J; Dudhia R; Arora H
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Aug; 33(7):700-705. PubMed ID: 37691179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans - A prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides.
    Flügge T; Derksen W; Te Poel J; Hassan B; Nelson K; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1113-1118. PubMed ID: 27440381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of zirconia crown artifacts on cone beam computed tomography scans and image superimposition of tomographic image and tooth surface scan: An in vitro study.
    Alaidrous M; Finkelman M; Kudara Y; Campos HC; Kim Y; De Souza AB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Apr; 125(4):684.e1-684.e8. PubMed ID: 33549342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of CT cone-beam geometry using a novel method insensitive to phantom fabrication inaccuracy: implications for isocenter localization accuracy.
    Ford JC; Zheng D; Williamson JF
    Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):2829-40. PubMed ID: 21815358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Novel artifact-robust and highly visible zinc solid fiducial marker for kilovoltage x-ray image-guided radiation therapy.
    Wang T; Inubushi S; Ikeo N; Mukai T; Okumura K; Akasaka H; Yada R; Yoshida K; Miyawaki D; Ishihara T; Nakaoka A; Sasaki R
    Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):4703-4710. PubMed ID: 32696571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quantitative assessment on artifacts of dental restorative materials in cone beam computed tomography].
    Yuan FS; Sun YC; Xie XY; Wang Y; Lv PJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Dec; 45(6):989-92. PubMed ID: 24343088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Registration accuracy between intraoral-scanned and cone-beam computed tomography-scanned crowns in various registration methods.
    Lim SW; Hwang HS; Cho IS; Baek SH; Cho JH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Mar; 157(3):348-356. PubMed ID: 32115113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Moving metal artifact reduction in cone-beam CT scans with implanted cylindrical gold markers.
    Toftegaard J; Fledelius W; Seghers D; Huber M; Brehm M; Worm ES; Elstrøm UV; Poulsen PR
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121710. PubMed ID: 25471957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic image-to-world registration based on x-ray projections in cone-beam CT-guided interventions.
    Hamming NM; Daly MJ; Irish JC; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1800-12. PubMed ID: 19544799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Referencing of markerless CT data sets with cone beam subvolume including registration markers to ease computer-assisted surgery - a clinical and technical research.
    Essig H; Rana M; Kokemueller H; Zizelmann C; von See C; Ruecker M; Tavassol F; Gellrich NC
    Int J Med Robot; 2013 Sep; 9(3):e39-45. PubMed ID: 22740167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positional accuracy of a prosthetic treatment plan incorporated into a cone beam computed tomography scan using surface scan registration.
    Jamjoom FZ; Kim DG; McGlumphy EA; Lee DJ; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):367-374. PubMed ID: 29703673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Virtual surgical planning for orthognathic surgery using digital data transfer and an intraoral fiducial marker: the charlotte method.
    Bobek S; Farrell B; Choi C; Farrell B; Weimer K; Tucker M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 73(6):1143-58. PubMed ID: 25795181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-cone beam computed tomography rigid registration of the head: an in-vitro study.
    Al-Saleh MA; Punithakumar K; Jaremko JL; Alsufyani NA; Boulanger P; Major PW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Mar; 121(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 26795452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement Accuracy in Cone Beam Computed Tomography in the Presence of Metal Artifact.
    Ismail A; Lakschevitz F; MacDonald D; Ford NL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(1):143-152. PubMed ID: 35235633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using cone-beam CT projection images to estimate the average and complete trajectory of a fiducial marker moving with respiration.
    Becker N; Smith WL; Quirk S; Kay I
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(24):7439-52. PubMed ID: 21098915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of artifact area on cone beam computed tomography scans when integrated with intraoral scans.
    Biao Y; Kim DW; Hwang HS; Lee KM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Apr; 131(4):468-474. PubMed ID: 32891574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated target tracking in kilovoltage images using dynamic templates of fiducial marker clusters.
    Campbell WG; Miften M; Jones BL
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):364-374. PubMed ID: 28035655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The potential failure risk of the cone-beam computed tomography-based planning target volume margin definition for prostate image-guided radiotherapy based on a prospective single-institutional hybrid analysis.
    Hirose K; Sato M; Hatayama Y; Kawaguchi H; Komai F; Sohma M; Obara H; Suzuki M; Tanaka M; Fujioka I; Ichise K; Takai Y; Aoki M
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Jun; 13(1):106. PubMed ID: 29880006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of different registration methods and dental restorations on the registration duration and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral scans: a retrospective clinical study.
    Piao XY; Park JM; Kim H; Kim Y; Shim JS
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Sep; 26(9):5763-5771. PubMed ID: 35538331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.