132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37602736)
21. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Child Sexual Abuse Cases: Investigating the Role of Delayed Disclosure and Relationship to the Perpetrator.
Miller QC; Call AA; London K
J Interpers Violence; 2022 Dec; 37(23-24):NP23374-NP23396. PubMed ID: 35285346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mock Juror Perceptions of Credibility and Culpability in an Autistic Defendant.
Maras K; Marshall I; Sands C
J Autism Dev Disord; 2019 Mar; 49(3):996-1010. PubMed ID: 30382444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Jurors use mental state information to assess breach in negligence cases.
Margoni F; Brown TR
Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105442. PubMed ID: 36996604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Can jurors be biased in their evaluation of third-party evidence within cases of rape?
Parsons A; Mojtahedi D
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 85():101837. PubMed ID: 36122514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Will jurors correct for evidence interdependence in their verdicts? It depends.
Pate M; Kienzle M; Vogler V
Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 30266044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Eyewitness confidence and mock juror decisions of guilt: A meta-analytic review.
Slane CR; Dodson CS
Law Hum Behav; 2022 Feb; 46(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 35073115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. What are we studying? Student jurors, community jurors, and construct validity.
Keller SR; Wiener RL
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):376-94. PubMed ID: 21766327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Defendant stereotypicality moderates the effect of confession evidence on judgments of guilt.
Smalarz L; Madon S; Turosak A
Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):355-368. PubMed ID: 29939062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Empathy and jurors' decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations.
Haegerich TM; Bottoms BL
Law Hum Behav; 2000 Aug; 24(4):421-48. PubMed ID: 10974801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Talking about a black man: the influence of defendant and character witness race on jurors' use of character evidence.
Maeder EM; Hunt JS
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 21796674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of criminal defendant's history of childhood sexual abuse and personality disorder diagnosis on juror decision making.
Butler E; Jacquin K
Personal Ment Health; 2014 Aug; 8(3):188-98. PubMed ID: 24753498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Who Is the Rotten Apple? Mock Jurors' Views of Teacher-Student Sexual Contact.
Anderson A; Wingrove T; Fox P; McLean K; Styer E
J Interpers Violence; 2018 May; 33(9):1449-1471. PubMed ID: 26621035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Saving damsels, sentencing deviants and selective chivalry decisions: juror decision-making in an ambiguous assault case.
Meaux LT; Cox J; Kopkin MR
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(5):724-736. PubMed ID: 31984048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Racial Composition of Couples in Battered Spouse Syndrome Cases: A Look at Juror Perceptions and Decisions.
Mossière A; Maeder EM; Pica E
J Interpers Violence; 2018 Sep; 33(18):2867-2890. PubMed ID: 26917572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors' sentencing decisions.
Kern R; Libkuman TM; Temple SL
J Interpers Violence; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1515-35. PubMed ID: 17993639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mock jurors' awareness of age-related changes in memory and cognitive capacity.
Martschuk N; Sporer SL
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(3):441-464. PubMed ID: 33071551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Jurors' cognitive depletion and performance during jury deliberation as a function of jury diversity and defendant race.
Peter-Hagene L
Law Hum Behav; 2019 Jun; 43(3):232-249. PubMed ID: 31120276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The influence of mitigation evidence, ethnicity, and SES on death penalty decisions by European American and Latino venire persons.
Espinoza RK; Willis-Esqueda C
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol; 2015 Apr; 21(2):288-99. PubMed ID: 25150818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
