143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37602901)
1. Landscape heterogeneity provides co-benefits to predator and prey.
Kuntze CC; Pauli JN; Zulla CJ; Keane JJ; Roberts KN; Dotters BP; Sawyer SC; Peery MZ
Ecol Appl; 2023 Dec; 33(8):e2908. PubMed ID: 37602901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increased autumn rainfall disrupts predator-prey interactions in fragmented boreal forests.
Terraube J; Villers A; Poudré L; Varjonen R; Korpimäki E
Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Apr; 23(4):1361-1373. PubMed ID: 27371812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predation risk in relation to brain size in alternative prey of pygmy owls varies depending on the abundance of main prey.
Møller AP; Hongisto K; Korpimäki E
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0236155. PubMed ID: 32915780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Describing vegetation characteristics used by two rare forest-dwelling species: Will established reserves provide for coastal marten in Oregon?
Moriarty KM; Verschuyl J; Kroll AJ; Davis R; Chapman J; Hollen B
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210865. PubMed ID: 30703124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional partitioning of resources by congeneric forest predators with recent sympatry.
Jenkins JMA; Lesmeister DB; Wiens JD; Kane JT; Kane VR; Verschuyl J
Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):6036. PubMed ID: 30988324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of forest management on California Spotted Owls: implications for reducing wildfire risk in fire‐prone forests.
Tempel DJ; Gutiérrez RJ; Whitmore SA; Reetz MJ; Stoelting RE; Berigan WJ; Seamans ME; Zachariah Peery M
Ecol Appl; 2014; 24(8):2089-106. PubMed ID: 29188683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What do predators really want? The role of gerbil energetic state in determining prey choice by Barn Owls.
Embar K; Mukherjee S; Kotler BP
Ecology; 2014 Feb; 95(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 24669722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survival of male Tengmalm's owls increases with cover of old forest in their territory.
Hakkarainen H; Korpimäki E; Laaksonen T; Nikula A; Suorsa P
Oecologia; 2008 Mar; 155(3):479-86. PubMed ID: 18080142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multistate Models Reveal Long-Term Trends of Northern Spotted Owls in the Absence of a Novel Competitor.
Kroll AJ; Jones JE; Stringer AB; Meekins DJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0152888. PubMed ID: 27065016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transient dynamics of invasive competition: barred owls, spotted owls, habitat, and the demons of competition present.
Dugger KM; Anthony RG; Andrews LS
Ecol Appl; 2011 Oct; 21(7):2459-68. PubMed ID: 22073635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors influencing predator roadkills: The availability of prey in road verges.
Silva C; Simões MP; Mira A; Santos SM
J Environ Manage; 2019 Oct; 247():644-650. PubMed ID: 31279141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nocturnal noise and habitat homogeneity limit species richness of owls in an urban environment.
Fröhlich A; Ciach M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jun; 26(17):17284-17291. PubMed ID: 31012067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fire as a driver and mediator of predator-prey interactions.
Doherty TS; Geary WL; Jolly CJ; Macdonald KJ; Miritis V; Watchorn DJ; Cherry MJ; Conner LM; González TM; Legge SM; Ritchie EG; Stawski C; Dickman CR
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2022 Aug; 97(4):1539-1558. PubMed ID: 35320881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conspecific and congeneric interactions shape increasing rates of breeding dispersal of northern spotted owls.
Jenkins JMA; Lesmeister DB; Forsman ED; Dugger KM; Ackers SH; Andrews LS; Gremel SA; Hollen B; McCafferty CE; Pruett MS; Reid JA; Sovern SG; Wiens JD
Ecol Appl; 2021 Oct; 31(7):e02398. PubMed ID: 34212458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Food availability and predation risk, rather than intrinsic attributes, are the main factors shaping the reproductive decisions of a long-lived predator.
Hoy SR; Millon A; Petty SJ; Whitfield DP; Lambin X
J Anim Ecol; 2016 Jul; 85(4):892-902. PubMed ID: 26990178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age and sex differences in numerical responses, dietary shifts, and total responses of a generalist predator to population dynamics of main prey.
Masoero G; Laaksonen T; Morosinotto C; Korpimäki E
Oecologia; 2020 Mar; 192(3):699-711. PubMed ID: 32008080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Competitive exclusion within the predator community influences the distribution of a threatened prey species.
Byholm P; Burgas D; Virtanen T; Valkama J
Ecology; 2012 Aug; 93(8):1802-8. PubMed ID: 22928409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraguild predation and competition impacts on a subordinate predator.
Björklund H; Santangeli A; Blanchet FG; Huitu O; Lehtoranta H; Lindén H; Valkama J; Laaksonen T
Oecologia; 2016 May; 181(1):257-69. PubMed ID: 26841931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A spatial theory for characterizing predator-multiprey interactions in heterogeneous landscapes.
Fortin D; Buono PL; Schmitz OJ; Courbin N; Losier C; St-Laurent MH; Drapeau P; Heppell S; Dussault C; Brodeur V; Mainguy J
Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 282(1812):20150973. PubMed ID: 26224710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cascading effects of predation risk determine how marine predators become terrestrial prey on an oceanic island.
Thomsen SK; Green DJ
Ecology; 2016 Dec; 97(12):3530-3537. PubMed ID: 27912006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
