These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37603229)

  • 1. Performance of Gradient and Gradient-Free Optimizers in Transient Hydraulic Tomography.
    Chintala S; Kambhammettu BVNP; Harmya TS
    Ground Water; 2024; 62(3):371-383. PubMed ID: 37603229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A New Randomized Binary Prior Model for Hydraulic Tomography in Fractured Aquifers.
    Poduri S; Kambhammettu B; Gorugantula S
    Ground Water; 2021 Jul; 59(4):537-548. PubMed ID: 33462817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hydraulic Tomography: Continuity and Discontinuity of High-K and Low-K Zones.
    Hochstetler DL; Barrash W; Leven C; Cardiff M; Chidichimo F; Kitanidis PK
    Ground Water; 2016 Mar; 54(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 26096272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of ERT, Saline Tracer and Numerical Studies to Delineate Preferential Paths in Fractured Granites.
    Sreeparvathy V; Kambhammettu BVNP; Peddinti SR; Sarada PSL
    Ground Water; 2019 Jan; 57(1):126-139. PubMed ID: 29569235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hydraulic tomography offers improved imaging of heterogeneity in fractured rocks.
    Illman WA
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(5):659-84. PubMed ID: 24749939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hydraulic Tomography: 3D Hydraulic Conductivity, Fracture Network, and Connectivity in Mudstone.
    Tiedeman CR; Barrash W
    Ground Water; 2020 Mar; 58(2):238-257. PubMed ID: 31187873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Hydraulic Conductivity Estimates from Various Approaches with Groundwater Flow Models.
    Sun D; Luo N; Vandenhoff A; McCall W; Zhao Z; Wang C; Rudolph DL; Illman WA
    Ground Water; 2024; 62(3):384-404. PubMed ID: 37605321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Field study of hydrogeologic characterization methods in a heterogeneous aquifer.
    Alexander M; Berg SJ; Illman WA
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(3):365-82. PubMed ID: 21671501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of piezometer construction on groundwater sampling in fractured rock.
    Kozuskanich J; Novakowski KS; Anderson BC
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(2):266-78. PubMed ID: 21797851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurements of groundwater velocity in discrete rock fractures.
    Novakowski K; Bickerton G; Lapcevic P; Voralek J; Ross N
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Jan; 82(1-2):44-60. PubMed ID: 16239047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. FracKfinder: A MATLAB Toolbox for Computing Three-Dimensional Hydraulic Conductivity Tensors for Fractured Porous Media.
    Young NL; Reber JE; Simpkins WW
    Ground Water; 2019 Jan; 57(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 30381820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Poroelastic effects on fracture characterization.
    Burbey TJ
    Ground Water; 2013; 51(6):904-13. PubMed ID: 23387850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving estimates of groundwater velocity in a fractured rock borehole using hydraulic and tracer dilution methods.
    Maldaner CH; Quinn PM; Cherry JA; Parker BL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Jul; 214():75-86. PubMed ID: 29907430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting a Defective Casing Seal at the Top of a Bedrock Aquifer.
    Richard SK; Chesnaux R; Rouleau A
    Ground Water; 2016 Mar; 54(2):296-303. PubMed ID: 26212855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of hydraulic tomography with traditional methods at a highly heterogeneous site.
    Berg SJ; Illman WA
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 24428358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Numerical assessments of recharge-dominated groundwater flow and transport in the nearshore reclamation area in western Taiwan.
    Ni CF; Li WC; Hsu SM; Lee IH; Lin CP
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jan; 191(2):83. PubMed ID: 30659403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One-dimensional analytical solution for hydraulic head and numerical solution for solute transport through a horizontal fracture for submarine groundwater discharge.
    He C; Wang T; Zhao Z; Hao Y; Yeh TJ; Zhan H
    J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Nov; 206():1-9. PubMed ID: 28964541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of site conditions for disposal of low- and intermediate-level radioactive wastes: a case study in southern China.
    Yi S; Ma H; Zheng C; Zhu X; Wang H; Li X; Hu X; Qin J
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jan; 414():624-31. PubMed ID: 22119030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practical issues in imaging hydraulic conductivity through hydraulic tomography.
    Illman WA; Craig AJ; Liu X
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 18181871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of Groundwater Hydraulic Gradient on Bank Storage Metrics.
    Welch C; Harrington GA; Cook PG
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(5):782-93. PubMed ID: 25297950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.