134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37603482)
1. Non-Isocentric Geometry for Next-Generation Tomosynthesis With Super-Resolution.
Acciavatti RJ; Choi CJ; Vent TL; Barufaldi B; Cohen EA; Wileyto EP; Maidment ADA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2024 Jan; 43(1):377-391. PubMed ID: 37603482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oblique reconstructions in tomosynthesis. II. Super-resolution.
Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111912. PubMed ID: 24320445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Achieving Isotropic Super-Resolution with a Non-Isocentric Acquisition Geometry in a Next-Generation Tomosynthesis System.
Acciavatti RJ; Choi CJ; Vent TL; Barufaldi B; Maidment ADA
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2022; 12031():. PubMed ID: 37692411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of super-resolution and image acquisition on the detection of calcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Barufaldi B; Acciavatti RJ; Conant EF; Maidment ADA
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):193-203. PubMed ID: 37572187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Observation of super-resolution in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7518-39. PubMed ID: 23231301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Goodsitt M; Carson PL; Hadjiiski L; Schmitz A; Eberhard JW; Claus BE
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5703-12. PubMed ID: 21992385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oblique reconstructions in tomosynthesis. I. Linear systems theory.
Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111911. PubMed ID: 24320444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5219-32. PubMed ID: 19175081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Super-Resolution in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Limitations of the Conventional System Design and Strategies for Optimization.
Acciavatti RJ; Vent TL; Barufaldi B; Wileyto EP; Noël PB; Maidment ADA
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2020 May; 11513():. PubMed ID: 37842133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast tomosynthesis using the multiple projection algorithm adapted for stationary detectors.
Malliori A; Bliznakova K; Bliznakov Z; Cockmartin L; Bosmans H; Pallikarakis N
J Xray Sci Technol; 2016; 24(1):23-41. PubMed ID: 26890907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proposing Rapid Source Pulsing for Improved Super-Resolution in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Acciavatti RJ; Vent TL; Barufaldi B; Wileyto EP; Noël PB; Maidment ADA
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2020 Feb; 11312():. PubMed ID: 37927528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Line-based iterative geometric calibration method for a tomosynthesis system.
Choi CJ; Vent TL; Acciavatti RJ; Maidment ADA
Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2444-2460. PubMed ID: 38394613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigating simulation-based metrics for characterizing linear iterative reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Rose SD; Sanchez AA; Sidky EY; Pan X
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):e279-e296. PubMed ID: 28901614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
Sechopoulos I; Ghetti C
Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1199-207. PubMed ID: 19472626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis.
Gong Z; Klanian K; Patel T; Sullivan O; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7580-92. PubMed ID: 23231306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of source blur on digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5572-5592. PubMed ID: 31494953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
