These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37604989)

  • 1. Reducing political polarization in the United States with a mobile chat platform.
    Combs A; Tierney G; Guay B; Merhout F; Bail CA; Hillygus DS; Volfovsky A
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Sep; 7(9):1454-1461. PubMed ID: 37604989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
    Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing opinion polarization: Effects of exposure to similar people with differing political views.
    Balietti S; Getoor L; Goldstein DG; Watts DJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Dec; 118(52):. PubMed ID: 34937747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beyond partisan filters: Can underreported news reduce issue polarization?
    Bram C
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(2):e0297808. PubMed ID: 38363749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization.
    Bail CA; Argyle LP; Brown TW; Bumpus JP; Chen H; Hunzaker MBF; Lee J; Mann M; Merhout F; Volfovsky A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Sep; 115(37):9216-9221. PubMed ID: 30154168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generically partisan: Polarization in political communication.
    Novoa G; Echelbarger M; Gelman A; Gelman SA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Nov; 120(47):e2309361120. PubMed ID: 37956300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Partisan self-interest is an important driver for people's support for the regulation of targeted political advertising.
    Baum K; Meissner S; Krasnova H
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250506. PubMed ID: 33979358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Online experiment during the 2020 US-Iran crisis shows that exposure to common enemies can increase political polarization.
    Jahani E; Gallagher N; Merhout F; Cavalli N; Guilbeault D; Leng Y; Bail CA
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19304. PubMed ID: 36369344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Opposing views: associations of political polarization, political party affiliation, and social trust with COVID-19 vaccination intent and receipt.
    Dolman AJ; Fraser T; Panagopoulos C; Aldrich DP; Kim D
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2023 Mar; 45(1):36-39. PubMed ID: 35077546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Partisan conflict over content moderation is more than disagreement about facts.
    Appel RE; Pan J; Roberts ME
    Sci Adv; 2023 Nov; 9(44):eadg6799. PubMed ID: 37922349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ideological asymmetry in the diffusion of moralized content on social media among political leaders.
    Brady WJ; Wills JA; Burkart D; Jost JT; Van Bavel JJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1802-1813. PubMed ID: 30589291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social media use and vaccination among Democrats and Republicans: Informational and normative influences.
    DeMora SL; Granados Samayoa JA; Albarracín D
    Soc Sci Med; 2024 Jul; 352():117031. PubMed ID: 38850678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Partisan styles of self-presentation in U.S. Twitter bios.
    Essig L; DellaPosta D
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):1077. PubMed ID: 38212630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sick of Health Care Politics? Comparing Views of Quality of Care Between Democrats and Republicans.
    Scott KW; Blendon RJ; Benson JM
    J Healthc Qual; 2016; 38(6):e39-e51. PubMed ID: 27579601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychological Barriers to Bipartisan Public Support for Climate Policy.
    Van Boven L; Ehret PJ; Sherman DK
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2018 Jul; 13(4):492-507. PubMed ID: 29961412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Seeing Red: Anger Increases How Much Republican Identification Predicts Partisan Attitudes and Perceived Polarization.
    Huber M; Van Boven L; Park B; Pizzi WT
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0139193. PubMed ID: 26407321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber?
    Barberá P; Jost JT; Nagler J; Tucker JA; Bonneau R
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1531-42. PubMed ID: 26297377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms.
    Waller I; Anderson A
    Nature; 2021 Dec; 600(7888):264-268. PubMed ID: 34853472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans.
    Moore-Berg SL; Ankori-Karlinsky LO; Hameiri B; Bruneau E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jun; 117(26):14864-14872. PubMed ID: 32527858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Partisanship and the Pandemic: How and Why Americans Followed Party Cues on COVID-19.
    Mehlhaff ID; Tarillo MC; Vanegas A; Hetherington MJ
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2024 Jun; 49(3):351-374. PubMed ID: 37988071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.