BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37605627)

  • 21. Comparison of biparametric and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
    Xu L; Zhang G; Shi B; Liu Y; Zou T; Yan W; Xiao Y; Xue H; Feng F; Lei J; Jin Z; Sun H
    Cancer Imaging; 2019 Dec; 19(1):90. PubMed ID: 31864408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.
    Tamada T; Kido A; Yamamoto A; Takeuchi M; Miyaji Y; Moriya T; Sone T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jan; 53(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 32614123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An integrated nomogram combining deep learning, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scoring, and clinical variables for identification of clinically significant prostate cancer on biparametric MRI: a retrospective multicentre study.
    Hiremath A; Shiradkar R; Fu P; Mahran A; Rastinehad AR; Tewari A; Tirumani SH; Purysko A; Ponsky L; Madabhushi A
    Lancet Digit Health; 2021 Jul; 3(7):e445-e454. PubMed ID: 34167765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Autosegmentation of Prostate Zones and Cancer Regions from Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Images by Using Deep-Learning-Based Neural Networks.
    Lai CC; Wang HK; Wang FN; Peng YC; Lin TP; Peng HH; Shen SH
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(8):. PubMed ID: 33921451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical Application of Biparametric MRI Texture Analysis for Detection and Evaluation of High-Grade Prostate Cancer in Zone-Specific Regions.
    Niu XK; Chen ZF; Chen L; Li J; Peng T; Li X
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Mar; 210(3):549-556. PubMed ID: 29220213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Thompson JE; van Leeuwen PJ; Moses D; Shnier R; Brenner P; Delprado W; Pulbrook M; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Hayen A; Stricker PD
    J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1428-1435. PubMed ID: 26529298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Are Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Images Necessary for Prostate Cancer Detection on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
    Mussi TC; Martins T; Garcia RG; Filippi RZ; Lemos GC; Baroni RH
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Jun; 15(3):e447-e454. PubMed ID: 27856204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prospective comparison of a fast 1.5-T biparametric with the 3.0-T multiparametric ESUR magnetic resonance imaging protocol as a triage test for men at risk of prostate cancer.
    Van Nieuwenhove S; Saussez TP; Thiry S; Trefois P; Annet L; Michoux N; Lecouvet F; Tombal B
    BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):411-420. PubMed ID: 30240059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Single Center Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging against Transperineal Prostate Mapping Biopsy: An Analysis of Men with Benign Histology and Insignificant Cancer following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy.
    Pal RP; Ahmad R; Trecartan S; Voss J; Ahmed S; Bazo A; Lloyd J; Walton TJ
    J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):302-308. PubMed ID: 29477717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of biparametric MRI to full multiparametric MRI for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Sherrer RL; Glaser ZA; Gordetsky JB; Nix JW; Porter KK; Rais-Bahrami S
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 May; 22(2):331-336. PubMed ID: 30413806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Diagnostic Performance of PI-RADS v2, Proposed Adjusted PI-RADS v2 and Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Preliminary Study.
    Cai GH; Yang QH; Chen WB; Liu QY; Zeng YR; Zeng YJ
    Curr Oncol; 2021 May; 28(3):1823-1834. PubMed ID: 34065851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study.
    Thompson JE; Moses D; Shnier R; Brenner P; Delprado W; Ponsky L; Pulbrook M; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Hayen A; Stricker PD
    J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 24518762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of clinically significant prostate cancer using biparametric magnetic resonance imaging: An evolving concept.
    Mahajan M; Gupta V; Gupta P; Sharma P; Abrol D
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2022; 18(6):1640-1645. PubMed ID: 36412424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biparametric 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging for prostatic cancer detection in a biopsy-naïve patient population: a further improvement of PI-RADS v2?
    Stanzione A; Imbriaco M; Cocozza S; Fusco F; Rusconi G; Nappi C; Mirone V; Mangiapia F; Brunetti A; Ragozzino A; Longo N
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 85(12):2269-2274. PubMed ID: 27842676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biparametric MR signal characteristics can predict histopathological measures of prostate cancer.
    To MNN; Kwak JT
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):8027-8038. PubMed ID: 35505115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Deep-Learning Models for Detection and Localization of Visible Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multi-Parametric MRI.
    Sun Z; Wu P; Cui Y; Liu X; Wang K; Gao G; Wang H; Zhang X; Wang X
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Oct; 58(4):1067-1081. PubMed ID: 36825823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
    Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Transrectal Ultrasound in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Study With Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Zhang M; Tang J; Luo Y; Wang Y; Wu M; Memmott B; Gao J
    J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Jul; 38(7):1823-1830. PubMed ID: 30561768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fully Automatic Deep Learning in Bi-institutional Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Effects of Cohort Size and Heterogeneity.
    Netzer N; Weißer C; Schelb P; Wang X; Qin X; Görtz M; Schütz V; Radtke JP; Hielscher T; Schwab C; Stenzinger A; Kuder TA; Gnirs R; Hohenfellner M; Schlemmer HP; Maier-Hein KH; Bonekamp D
    Invest Radiol; 2021 Dec; 56(12):799-808. PubMed ID: 34049336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI for the detection of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion in biopsy naïve patients.
    Caglic I; Sushentsev N; Shah N; Warren AY; Lamb BW; Barrett T
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 141():109804. PubMed ID: 34062473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.