154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37605764)
1. Cumulative Dissipated Energy (CDE) in Three Phaco-Fragmentation Techniques for Dense Cataract Removal.
Fernández-Muñoz E; Chávez-Romero Y; Rivero-Gómez R; Aridjis R; Gonzalez-Salinas R
Clin Ophthalmol; 2023; 17():2405-2412. PubMed ID: 37605764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of phaco-chop, divide-and-conquer, and stop-and-chop phaco techniques in microincision coaxial cataract surgery.
Park J; Yum HR; Kim MS; Harrison AR; Kim EC
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1463-9. PubMed ID: 23910714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phaco-Chop versus Divide-and-Conquer in Patients Who Underwent Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Guedes J; Pereira SF; Amaral DC; Hespanhol LC; Faneli AC; Oliveira RDC; Mora-Paez DJ; Fontes BM
Clin Ophthalmol; 2024; 18():1535-1546. PubMed ID: 38827775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two popular nuclear disassembly techniques for cataract surgeons in training: divide and conquer versus stop and chop.
Coppola M; Marchese A; Rabiolo A; Cicinelli MV; Knutsson KA
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 39(9):2097-2102. PubMed ID: 30465292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.
Gigliola S; Sborgia G; Niro A; Palmisano C; Puzo P; Giuliani G; Sborgia L; Sisto D; Pastore V; Furino C; Donghia R; Sborgia A; Boscia F; Alessio G
Int J Ophthalmol; 2021; 14(12):1868-1875. PubMed ID: 34926201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping.
Miyamoto N; Kiritoshi S; Akamime R; Akimoto M
Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 41(9):3081-3086. PubMed ID: 33948807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the reverse chopper-assisted prechop and phaco-chop nucleotomy techniques during phacoemulsification for cataracts with grade III nuclei: a randomized controlled trial.
Tao J; Wan Y; Song X
Ann Transl Med; 2023 Jan; 11(2):105. PubMed ID: 36819536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of divide and conquer and phaco-chop techniques during fluid-based phaco-emulsification.
Tsorbatzoglou A; Módis L; Kertész K; Németh G; Berta A
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 17534809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 45-degree Kelman and 45-degree balanced phaco tip designs in torsional microcoaxial phacoemulsification.
Demircan S; Ataş M; Göktaş E; Başkan B
Int J Ophthalmol; 2015; 8(6):1168-72. PubMed ID: 26682167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endothelial cell damage after cataract surgery: divide-and-conquer versus phaco-chop technique.
Storr-Paulsen A; Norregaard JC; Ahmed S; Storr-Paulsen T; Pedersen TH
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jun; 34(6):996-1000. PubMed ID: 18499008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combined 30-degree bevel up and down technique against 0-degree phaco tip for phacoemulsification surgery of hard cataracts.
Joshi RS; Muley SJ
Clin Ophthalmol; 2017; 11():1073-1079. PubMed ID: 28652692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of energy required for phaco-chop and divide and conquer phacoemulsification.
DeBry P; Olson RJ; Crandall AS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 1998 May; 24(5):689-92. PubMed ID: 9610455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of Balanced Torsional Phacoemulsification Tip for Cataract Surgery.
Sabur H; Eroglu SA; Azarsiz SS
J Curr Ophthalmol; 2022; 34(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 35620374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of prechop technique in phacoemulsification for cataract patients with highly liquefied vitreous: a retrospective study.
Zhao J; Li Z; Liu Y; Han X; Huang S
BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):167. PubMed ID: 35421948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phacoemulsification time and power requirements in phaco chop and divide and conquer nucleofractis techniques.
Wong T; Hingorani M; Lee V
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2000 Sep; 26(9):1374-8. PubMed ID: 11020623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound energy in phacoemulsification: a comparative analysis of phaco-chop and stop-and-chop techniques according to the degree of nuclear density.
Park JH; Lee SM; Kwon JW; Kim MK; Hyon JY; Wee WR; Lee JH; Han YK
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2010; 41(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 20307043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A retrospective randomized study to compare the energy delivered using CDE with different techniques and OZil settings by different surgeons in phacoemulsification.
Chen M; Sweeney HW; Luke B; Chen M; Brown M
Clin Ophthalmol; 2009; 3():401-3. PubMed ID: 19688027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of surgical parameters using different lens fragmentation patterns in eyes undergoing laser-assisted cataract surgery.
Uy HS; Chan PS; Gil-Cazorla R; Shah S
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 39(11):2459-2465. PubMed ID: 30830545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mini-flared Kelman tip, reverse tip, and sidewinder tip with torsional phaco: a prospective randomized comparative study.
Hida WT; Tzelikis PF; Nakano CT; Motta AF; Alves MR
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2015; 78(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 25714532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of IOP based infusion system with and without balanced phaco tip on cumulative dissipated energy and estimated fluid usage in comparison to gravity fed infusion in torsional phacoemulsification.
Malik PK; Dewan T; Patidar AK; Sain E
Eye Vis (Lond); 2017; 4():22. PubMed ID: 28932753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
