BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37605764)

  • 21. [Cataract phacoemulsification techniques: "divide and conquer" versus "stop and chop"--comparative evaluation of operation course and early results].
    Mierzejewski A; Kałluzny JJ; Kałuzny B; Eliks I
    Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(4-5):612-7. PubMed ID: 15646480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of the phaco chop and drill-and-crack techniques for phacoemulsification of hard cataracts: A fellow eye study.
    Abdelmotaal H; Abdel-Radi M; Rateb MF; Eldaly ZH; Abdelazeem K
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2021 May; 99(3):e378-e386. PubMed ID: 32914563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Comparison of the Cystotome-Assisted Prechop and Phaco-Chop Phacoemulsification Nucleotomy Techniques.
    Wu LQ; Chen X; An XL; Zhou YW; Bi S
    Med Sci Monit; 2019 Dec; 25():10205-10211. PubMed ID: 31891939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Impact of Reused Phaco Tip on Outcomes of Phacoemulsification Surgery.
    Demircan S; Gokce G; Atas M; Baskan B; Goktas E; Zararsiz G
    Curr Eye Res; 2016 May; 41(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 25880893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Conventional Phacoemulsification Surgery Versus Femtosecond Laser Phacoemulsification Surgery: A Comparative Analysis of Cumulative Dissipated Energy and Corneal Endothelial Loss in Cataract Patients.
    Léda RM; Machado DCS; Hida WT; Motta AFP; Pacini TF; Amorim RF
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2023; 17():1709-1716. PubMed ID: 37361689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Phaco chop technique for cataract surgery in the dog.
    Warren C
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2004; 7(5):348-51. PubMed ID: 15310295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Torsional ultrasound mode versus combined torsional and conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification for eyes with hard cataract.
    Fakhry MA; El Shazly MI
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2011; 5():973-8. PubMed ID: 21792288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Phaco Prechop versus Divide and Conquer Phacoemulsification: A Prospective Comparative Interventional Study.
    Elnaby EA; El Zawahry OM; Abdelrahman AM; Ibrahim HE
    Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jul; 15(3):123-7. PubMed ID: 21369468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of pop and chop to divide and conquer in resident cataract surgery.
    Gross FJ; Garcia-Zalisnak DE; Bovee CE; Strawn JD
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2016; 10():1847-1851. PubMed ID: 27703325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparisons of the energy efficiency and intraocular safety of two torsional phacoemulsification tips.
    Sun YX; Cao R; Liu ZY; Xia HQ; Cen YJ; Gao L; Shi DD
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Oct; 22(1):392. PubMed ID: 36192712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of phacoemulsification time on the corneal endothelium using phacofracture and phaco chop techniques.
    Pirazzoli G; D'Eliseo D; Ziosi M; Acciarri R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1996 Sep; 22(7):967-9. PubMed ID: 9041091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Scoop and chop - A modified phaco-chop technique for pseudoexfoliation and cataract.
    Rao A; Sahay P; Das G; Sarangi S; Padhy D
    Oman J Ophthalmol; 2020; 13(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 32792799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative clinical study of Whitestar Signature phacoemulsification system with standard and Ellips FX handpieces.
    Tognetto D; D'Aloisio R; Cecchini P; Di Nicola M; Di Martino G
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1697-1702. PubMed ID: 28707255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Results of endocapsular phacofracture debulking of hard cataracts.
    Davison JA
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2015; 9():1233-8. PubMed ID: 26203213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Computer-assisted phacoemulsification for hard cataracts].
    Zemba M; Papadatu AC; Sîrbu LN; Avram C
    Oftalmologia; 2012; 56(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 23755523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The comparison between torsional and conventional mode phacoemulsification in moderate and hard cataracts.
    Kim DH; Wee WR; Lee JH; Kim MK
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):336-40. PubMed ID: 21165231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Comparison of Three Different Thick Epinucleus Removal Techniques in Cataract Surgery.
    Hwang HS; Lim BS; Kim MS; Kim EC
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2017; 32(3):285-290. PubMed ID: 26292026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Endothelial Cell Loss, Cumulative Dissipated Energy, and Surgically Induced Astigmatism in Sutureless Scleral Tunnel Phaco-Assisted Cataract Extraction in Advanced Cataracts.
    Salama MM; GamalElDin SA; ElShazly MI
    J Ophthalmol; 2022; 2022():4272571. PubMed ID: 35620412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A randomized controlled trial to assess safety and efficacy between terminal chop, stop and chop, and direct chop.
    Sinha A; Morya AK; Gupta V; Prasad R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2023 Dec; 71(12):3658-3662. PubMed ID: 37991300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Endothelial cell density changes in diabetic and nondiabetic eyes undergoing phacoemulsification employing phaco-chop technique.
    Fernández-Muñoz E; Zamora-Ortiz R; Gonzalez-Salinas R
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 39(8):1735-1741. PubMed ID: 30056522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.