These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37605817)

  • 1. Quality analysis of publicly available information about hypoplastic left heart syndrome.
    Brennan Z; Sharaf OM; Treffalls JA; Roa-Vidal N; Weinstein DJ; Bassuk JS; Stukov Y; Peek GJ; Bleiweis MS; Jacobs JP
    Cardiol Young; 2023 Jul; 33(7):1079-1085. PubMed ID: 37605817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality Assessment of Online Resources for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Patients.
    Clothier W; Treffalls JA; Tolbert PH; Harbin Z; Yan Q; Davies MG
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 85():96-104. PubMed ID: 35461994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
    Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality Analysis of Online Resources for Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease.
    Treffalls JA; Treffalls RN; Zachary H; Clothier W; Tolbert PH; Yan Q; Davies MG
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Jul; 83():1-9. PubMed ID: 34995744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the readability of online information about jones fracture.
    Al-Kharouf KFK; Khan FI; Robertson GA
    World J Methodol; 2023 Dec; 13(5):439-445. PubMed ID: 38229937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.
    Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS
    JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
    Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma.
    Martin CA; Khan S; Lee R; Do AT; Sridhar J; Crowell EL; Bowden EC
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(5):525-530. PubMed ID: 35301989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of the Patient Information Quality and Readability on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) on the Internet.
    Priyanka P; Hadi YB; Reynolds GJ
    Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018; 2018():2849390. PubMed ID: 30510923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inflammatory bowel disease: An evaluation of health information on the internet.
    Azer SA; AlOlayan TI; AlGhamdi MA; AlSanea MA
    World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 23(9):1676-1696. PubMed ID: 28321169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of Readability, Quality, and Content of Online Information Available for "Stem Cell" Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis.
    Ng MK; Mont MA; Piuzzi NS
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Mar; 35(3):647-651.e2. PubMed ID: 31678019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What parents are reading about laryngomalacia: Quality and readability of internet resources on laryngomalacia.
    Corredera E; Davis KS; Simons JP; Jabbour N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():175-179. PubMed ID: 29605350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transoral robotic surgery: Differences between online information and academic literature.
    Shetty KR; Wong K; Hashemi S; Shetty A; Levi JR
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2020; 41(4):102395. PubMed ID: 32008838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Depression in cancer: quality assessment of online patient education resources.
    Li ZHJ; Wang M; Ingledew PA
    Psychooncology; 2021 Mar; 30(3):400-407. PubMed ID: 33179340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality and readability of websites for patient information on tonsillectomy and sleep apnea.
    Chi E; Jabbour N; Aaronson NL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jul; 98():1-3. PubMed ID: 28583484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
    Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites.
    Vives M; Young L; Sabharwal S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):2826-31. PubMed ID: 19910867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
    Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
    Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.