These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37605817)
21. Quality and readability of online health information on menopausal hormone therapy in Canada: what are our patients reading? Murtaza F; Shirreff L; Huang LN; Jacobson M; Jarcevic R; Christakis MK Menopause; 2021 Dec; 29(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 34905747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Organ Donation on the Internet: Quality and Readability in English. Yazar MA; Kozanhan B Transplant Proc; 2021; 53(6):1777-1783. PubMed ID: 34243964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus. Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cross sectional analysis of scoliosis-specific information on the internet: potential for patient confusion and misinformation. Truumees D; Duncan A; Mayer EK; Geck M; Singh D; Truumees E Spine Deform; 2020 Dec; 8(6):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 32578159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review. Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information. Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument. Kaicker J; Borg Debono V; Dang W; Buckley N; Thabane L BMC Med; 2010 Oct; 8():59. PubMed ID: 20939875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Common Oculoplastics Diagnoses and Treatments. Cohen SA; Tijerina JD; Kossler A Semin Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 38(4):387-393. PubMed ID: 36524760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Critical Analysis of the Information Available Online for Ménière's Disease. Bojrab DI; Fritz C; Babu S; Lin KF Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Mar; 162(3):329-336. PubMed ID: 31986955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Online Patient Information on Domiciliary Oxygen Therapy: An Evaluation of Quality, Suitability, Reliability, Readability, and Content. Ang HL; Tan HH; Logie KM; McDonald CF; Khor YH Chest; 2022 Feb; 161(2):483-491. PubMed ID: 34390709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An analysis of cluster headache information provided on internet websites. Peterlin BL; Gambini-Suarez E; Lidicker J; Levin M Headache; 2008 Mar; 48(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 18005143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Quantitative Assessment of Online Patient Education Resources. Gulbrandsen TR; Skalitzky MK; Ryan SE; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Brown TS; Elkins JM Iowa Orthop J; 2022; 42(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 36601227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of the quality of patient-oriented information over internet on testicular cancer. Prasanth AS; Jayarajah U; Mohanappirian R; Seneviratne SA BMC Cancer; 2018 May; 18(1):491. PubMed ID: 29716564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluating the Readability, Credibility, and Quality of Spanish-Language Online Educational Resources for Knee Arthroplasty: Implications for Patient Education and Health Disparities. Busigó Torres R; Restrepo Mejia M; Arroyave JS; Stern BZ; Chen DD; Moucha CS; Poeran J; Hayden BL J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2024 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 39378370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. How evidence-based is the information on the internet about nausea and vomiting of pregnancy? Sacks S; Abenhaim HA J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Aug; 35(8):697-703. PubMed ID: 24007704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quality of Web-Based Sickle Cell Disease Resources for Health Care Transition: Website Content Analysis. Annesi T; Steinway C; Oluwole T; Shilly S; Szalda D; Myers R; Chen J; Jan S JMIR Pediatr Parent; 2023 Dec; 6():e48924. PubMed ID: 38100579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Quality Assessment of the Information Accessible to Patients on the Internet About the Whipple Procedure. Khachfe HH; Chahrour MA; Habib JR; Yu J; Jamali FR World J Surg; 2021 Jun; 45(6):1853-1859. PubMed ID: 33580299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Burn Prevention in Spanish: Assessment of Content Accuracy, Website Quality, and Readability of Online Sources. Gonzalez MD; Ortega P; Hendren-Santiago BK; Gillenwater TJ; Vrouwe SQ J Burn Care Res; 2023 Sep; 44(5):1031-1040. PubMed ID: 37249234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet. O'Neill SC; Baker JF; Fitzgerald C; Fleming C; Rowan F; Byrne D; Synnott K Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):E645-9. PubMed ID: 24583736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]