These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37606180)

  • 1. Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects.
    Riley RD; Ensor J; Hattle M; Papadimitropoulou K; Morris TP
    Res Synth Methods; 2023 Nov; 14(6):903-910. PubMed ID: 37606180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ.
    Burke DL; Ensor J; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(5):855-875. PubMed ID: 27747915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One-stage random effects meta-analysis using linear mixed models for aggregate continuous outcome data.
    Papadimitropoulou K; Stijnen T; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Sep; 10(3):360-375. PubMed ID: 30523676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. One-stage individual participant data meta-analysis models for continuous and binary outcomes: Comparison of treatment coding options and estimation methods.
    Riley RD; Legha A; Jackson D; Morris TP; Ensor J; Snell KIE; White IR; Burke DL
    Stat Med; 2020 Aug; 39(19):2536-2555. PubMed ID: 32394498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual participant data meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses based on aggregate data.
    Tudur Smith C; Marcucci M; Nolan SJ; Iorio A; Sudell M; Riley R; Rovers MM; Williamson PR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Sep; 9(9):MR000007. PubMed ID: 27595791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
    Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk of bias assessments in individual participant data meta-analyses of test accuracy and prediction models: a review shows improvements are needed.
    Levis B; Snell KIE; Damen JAA; Hattle M; Ensor J; Dhiman P; Andaur Navarro CL; Takwoingi Y; Whiting PF; Debray TPA; Reitsma JB; Moons KGM; Collins GS; Riley RD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Jan; 165():111206. PubMed ID: 37925059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simulation-based power calculations for planning a two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Ensor J; Burke DL; Snell KIE; Hemming K; Riley RD
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):41. PubMed ID: 29776399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual participant data meta-analysis for a binary outcome: one-stage or two-stage?
    Debray TP; Moons KG; Abo-Zaid GM; Koffijberg H; Riley RD
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60650. PubMed ID: 23585842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical analysis of individual participant data meta-analyses: a comparison of methods and recommendations for practice.
    Stewart GB; Altman DG; Askie LM; Duley L; Simmonds MC; Stewart LA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46042. PubMed ID: 23056232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of aggregate and individual participant data approaches to meta-analysis of randomised trials: An observational study.
    Tierney JF; Fisher DJ; Burdett S; Stewart LA; Parmar MKB
    PLoS Med; 2020 Jan; 17(1):e1003019. PubMed ID: 32004320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Obtaining and managing data sets for individual participant data meta-analysis: scoping review and practical guide.
    Ventresca M; Schünemann HJ; Macbeth F; Clarke M; Thabane L; Griffiths G; Noble S; Garcia D; Marcucci M; Iorio A; Zhou Q; Crowther M; Akl EA; Lyman GH; Gloy V; DiNisio M; Briel M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):113. PubMed ID: 32398016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing the use of aggregate data and various methods of integrating individual patient data to network meta-analysis and its application to first-line ART.
    Kanters S; Karim ME; Thorlund K; Anis AH; Zoratti M; Bansback N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Mar; 21(1):60. PubMed ID: 33784981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonlinear effects and effect modification at the participant-level in IPD meta-analysis part 1: analysis methods are often substandard.
    Marlin N; Godolphin PJ; Hooper RL; Riley RD; Rogozińska E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jul; 159():309-318. PubMed ID: 37146661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of one-stage vs two-stage individual patient data meta-analysis methods: A simulation study.
    Kontopantelis E
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):417-430. PubMed ID: 29786975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual participant data meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: A comparison of approaches for specifying and estimating one-stage models.
    Legha A; Riley RD; Ensor J; Snell KIE; Morris TP; Burke DL
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(29):4404-4420. PubMed ID: 30101507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: a review of the methodology.
    Debray TP; Moons KG; van Valkenhoef G; Efthimiou O; Hummel N; Groenwold RH; Reitsma JB;
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Dec; 6(4):293-309. PubMed ID: 26287812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.