156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37607863)
1. Does humeral fixation technique affect long-term outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty?
Li T; Levy KH; Duey AH; Patel AV; White CA; Cirino CM; Williams A; Whitelaw K; Shukla D; Parsons BO; Flatow EL; Cagle PJ
Clin Shoulder Elb; 2023 Sep; 26(3):245-251. PubMed ID: 37607863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cemented vs. press-fit humeral stems: a matched cohort analysis at a mean follow-up of 10 years.
Li T; Duey AH; Patel AV; White CA; Levy KH; Ranson WA; Cirino CM; Shukla D; Parsons BO; Flatow EL; Cagle PJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38242528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are short press-fit stems comparable to standard-length cemented stems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Van de Kleut ML; Yuan X; Athwal GS; Teeter MG
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Mar; 31(3):580-590. PubMed ID: 34968694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of press-fit versus peripherally cemented hybrid glenoid components in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: minimum 5-year follow-up.
Goodloe JB; Oldenburg KS; Toner S; Rabinowitz JM; Barfield WR; Eichinger JK; Friedman RJ
JSES Int; 2022 Jan; 6(1):21-25. PubMed ID: 35141671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Press-fit vs. cemented humeral stem fixation for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional outcomes at a mean follow-up of 9.5 years.
Mazaleyrat M; Favard L; Garaud P; Boileau P; Berhouet J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jan; 30(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 32838951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of cemented versus press-fit primary humeral stem fixation in the setting of revision shoulder arthroplasty.
Salesky MA; Grace TR; Feeley BT; Ma CB; Zhang AL
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 May; 27(5):801-807. PubMed ID: 29548544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.
Levy JC; Berglund D; Vakharia R; DeVito P; Tahal DS; Mijc D; Ameri B
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Sep; 477(9):2097-2108. PubMed ID: 31107323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short-term evaluation of humeral stress shielding following reverse shoulder arthroplasty using press-fit fixation compared with cemented fixation.
Denard PJ; Haidamous G; Gobezie R; Romeo AA; Lederman E
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 May; 29(5):906-912. PubMed ID: 31911215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cemented humeral stem
Uy M; Wang J; Horner NS; Bedi A; Leroux T; Alolabi B; Khan M
Bone Joint J; 2019 Sep; 101-B(9):1107-1114. PubMed ID: 31474140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cohort comparison of humeral implant designs in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: does implant design lead to lower rates of complications and revision?
Gorman RA; Christmas KN; Simon P; Mighell MA; Frankle MA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):850-857. PubMed ID: 32771605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-year minimum survivorship and radiographic analysis of a pressfit short humeral stem for total shoulder arthroplasty.
Larose G; Aibinder WR; Greene AT; Roche CP; Grey S; Faber KJ; Routman H; Antuña S; Wright T; Flurin PH; Zuckerman JD; Virk MS
JSES Int; 2024 Jan; 8(1):191-196. PubMed ID: 38312300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiographic evaluation of short-stem press-fit total shoulder arthroplasty: short-term follow-up.
Casagrande DJ; Parks DL; Torngren T; Schrumpf MA; Harmsen SM; Norris TR; Kelly JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Jul; 25(7):1163-9. PubMed ID: 26897311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Midterm results of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with a third-generation implant.
Levy JC; Berglund D; Vakharia R; Tahal DS; Mijc D; DeVito P; Motisi M
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Apr; 28(4):698-705. PubMed ID: 30472054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and radiographic results of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a comparative study with 2 to 5 years of follow-up.
Wiater JM; Moravek JE; Budge MD; Koueiter DM; Marcantonio D; Wiater BP
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 Aug; 23(8):1208-14. PubMed ID: 24561176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The incidence of radiographic aseptic loosening of the humeral component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Gilot G; Alvarez-Pinzon AM; Wright TW; Flurin PH; Krill M; Routman HD; Zuckerman JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Oct; 24(10):1555-9. PubMed ID: 25958209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short-term clinical outcome of an anatomic short-stem humeral component in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Romeo AA; Thorsness RJ; Sumner SA; Gobezie R; Lederman ES; Denard PJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jan; 27(1):70-74. PubMed ID: 28734716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cemented versus uncemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures.
Rossi LA; Guillermina BM; Buljubasich M; Atala N; Tanoira I; Bongiovanni S; Ranalletta M
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Feb; 31(2):261-268. PubMed ID: 34358669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures.
Lo EY; Rizkalla J; Montemaggi P; Majekodunmi T; Krishnan SG
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Aug; 30(8):1949-1956. PubMed ID: 33359397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Value comparison of humeral component press-fit and cemented techniques in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Berglund DD; Mijic D; Law TY; Kurowicki J; Rosas S; Levy JC
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Mar; 28(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 30392933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Humeral fixation by press-fitting of a tapered metaphyseal stem: a prospective radiographic study.
Matsen FA; Iannotti JP; Rockwood CA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Feb; 85(2):304-8. PubMed ID: 12571309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
