These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37608239)

  • 1. Analgesic effect of a lidocaine-ropivacaine mixture for extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: a randomized controlled trial.
    Hemmi T; Sasahara N; Yusa K; Ishikawa S; Kobayashi T; Iino M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Oct; 27(10):5969-5975. PubMed ID: 37608239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can local anesthesia with ropivacaine provide postoperative analgesia in extraction of impacted mandibular third molars? A randomized clinical trial.
    Amorim KS; Gercina AC; Ramiro FMS; Medeiros LA; de Araújo JSM; Groppo FC; Souza LMA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 May; 131(5):512-518. PubMed ID: 33223455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Local anaesthesia for surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Yang F; Gao Y; Zhang L; Zheng B; Wang L; Sun H; Huang D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Nov; 24(11):3781-3800. PubMed ID: 32833132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy and safety of 1% ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia after lower third molar surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical study.
    Brković B; Andrić M; Ćalasan D; Milić M; Stepić J; Vučetić M; Brajković D; Todorović L
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):779-785. PubMed ID: 27114091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is 0.75% ropivacaine more efficacious than 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine for IANB in surgical extraction of impacted lower third molar?
    Reddy KV; Jadhav A; Bhola N; Mishra A; Dakshinkar P
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 23(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 31089895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine, ropivacaine (with epinephrine) and their equal volume mixtures with lidocaine used for femoral and sciatic nerve blocks: a double-blind randomized study.
    Cuvillon P; Nouvellon E; Ripart J; Boyer JC; Dehour L; Mahamat A; L'hermite J; Boisson C; Vialles N; Lefrant JY; de La Coussaye JE
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Feb; 108(2):641-9. PubMed ID: 19151302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 2% lidocaine HCl with different epinephrine concentration for local anesthesia in participants undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover, phase IV trial.
    Karm MH; Park FD; Kang M; Kim HJ; Kang JW; Kim S; Kim YD; Kim CH; Seo KS; Kwon KH; Kim CH; Lee JW; Hong SW; Lim MH; Nam SK; Cho JM
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 May; 96(21):e6753. PubMed ID: 28538371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block and inferior alveolar nerve block plus buccal or lingual infiltration using articaine in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis: a preliminary prospective randomized single-blind clinical trial.
    Afkhami F; Pirmoazen S; Ardestani A; Fard MJK
    Quintessence Int; 2021 Sep; 52(9):820-826. PubMed ID: 34369941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Study of the Efficacy of 4% Articaine vs 2% Lidocaine in Surgical Removal of Bilaterally Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
    Mittal J; Kaur G; Mann HS; Narang S; Kamra M; Kapoor S; Sindhi M; Kataria R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):743-748. PubMed ID: 29959306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Analysis of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 0.5% Ropivacaine Versus 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with Adrenaline (1:80,000) for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
    Goyal R; Sharma P; Bali R
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2021 Jun; 20(2):234-239. PubMed ID: 33927491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of efficacy of 0.75% ropivacaine and 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline in pain control in extraction of mandibular posterior teeth: A double-blind study.
    Ranjan R; Santhosh Kumar SN; Singh M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(5):611-615. PubMed ID: 30409941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Analysis of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 0.5 and 0.75 % Ropivacaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
    Bhargava D; Chakravorty N; Rethish E; Deshpande A
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2014 Dec; 13(4):431-4. PubMed ID: 26225007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do length and gauge of dental needle affect success in performing an inferior alveolar nerve block during extraction of adult mandibular molars? A prospective, randomized observer-blind, clinical trial.
    Al-Moraissi EA; Al-Selwi AM; Al-Zendani EA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Aug; 25(8):4887-4893. PubMed ID: 33469717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Two Different Anesthetic Solutions on Injection Pain, Efficacy, and Duration of Soft-Tissue Anesthesia with Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Primary Molars.
    Elbay ÜŞ; Elbay M; Kaya E; Yıldırım S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(6):456-463. PubMed ID: 27805885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block during surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars.
    Sierra Rebolledo A; Delgado Molina E; Berini Aytís L; Gay Escoda C
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2007 Mar; 12(2):E139-44. PubMed ID: 17322803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth.
    Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
    J Endod; 2012 Apr; 38(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 22414822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peribulbar anesthesia with either 0.75% ropivacaine or a 2% lidocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine mixture for vitreoretinal surgery: a double-blinded study.
    Gioia L; Prandi E; Codenotti M; Casati A; Fanelli G; Torri TM; Azzolini C; Torri G
    Anesth Analg; 1999 Sep; 89(3):739-42. PubMed ID: 10475316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective randomized double-blind study to assess the latency and efficacy of twin-mix and 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a pilot study.
    Bhargava D; Sreekumar K; Rastogi S; Deshpande A; Chakravorty N
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 17(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 23143710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized anesthethic potency comparison between ropivacaine and bupivacaine on the perioperative regional anesthesia in lower third molar surgery.
    Tijanic M; Buric N
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 47(10):1652-1660. PubMed ID: 31395418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of Articaine versus Lidocaine in Supplemental Infiltration for Mandibular First versus Second Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.
    Shapiro MR; McDonald NJ; Gardner RJ; Peters MC; Botero TM
    J Endod; 2018 Apr; 44(4):523-528. PubMed ID: 29397214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.