145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37608637)
21. Five-Year Graft Survival of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (EK) versus Descemet Stripping EK and the Effect of Donor Sex Matching.
Price DA; Kelley M; Price FW; Price MO
Ophthalmology; 2018 Oct; 125(10):1508-1514. PubMed ID: 29731147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Three-millimeter incision descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty using sodium hyaluronate (healon): a survey of 105 eyes.
Foster JB; Vasan R; Walter KA
Cornea; 2011 Feb; 30(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 20847647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Endothelial cell loss and graft survival after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty.
Ang M; Mehta JS; Lim F; Bose S; Htoon HM; Tan D
Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; 119(11):2239-44. PubMed ID: 22885122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: three-year graft and endothelial cell survival compared with penetrating keratoplasty.
Price MO; Gorovoy M; Price FW; Benetz BA; Menegay HJ; Lass JH
Ophthalmology; 2013 Feb; 120(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 23107581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Glaucoma Therapy Escalation After Penetrating Keratoplasty to Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty for the Treatment of Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy: A Cohort Study.
Aldarrab A; Alsakran W; Al-Swailem SA; Al-Shahwan SA
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2022; 29(2):72-79. PubMed ID: 37123424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Paired-eye comparison of Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in children with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy.
Ashar JN; Ramappa M; Vaddavalli PK
Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 97(10):1247-9. PubMed ID: 23613513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Long-term Outcomes of Repeated Corneal Transplantations: A Prospective Dutch Registry Study.
Dickman MM; Spekreijse LS; Dunker SL; Winkens B; Berendschot TTJM; van den Biggelaar FJHM; Kruit PJ; Nuijts RMMA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 193():156-165. PubMed ID: 29963996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Graft rejection and graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty or posterior lamellar keratoplasty for fuchs endothelial dystrophy.
Hjortdal J; Pedersen IB; Bak-Nielsen S; Ivarsen A
Cornea; 2013 May; 32(5):e60-3. PubMed ID: 23086366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Anterior segment analysis and intraocular pressure elevation after penetrating keratoplasty and posterior lamellar endothelial keratoplasty.
Maier AK; Gundlach E; Gonnermann J; Klamann MK; Eulufi C; Joussen AM; Bertelmann E; Rieck P; Torun N
Ophthalmic Res; 2015; 53(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 25531077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes: a registry study.
Coster DJ; Lowe MT; Keane MC; Williams KA;
Ophthalmology; 2014 May; 121(5):979-87. PubMed ID: 24491643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Outcomes After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.
Maier AB; Milek J; Joussen AM; Dietrich-Ntoukas T; Lichtner G
Am J Ophthalmol; 2023 Jan; 245():222-232. PubMed ID: 36220351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) versus Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for corneal endothelial failure.
Stuart AJ; Romano V; Virgili G; Shortt AJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 6(6):CD012097. PubMed ID: 29940078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Preventive treatment of allograft rejection after endothelial keratoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Magnier F; Dutheil F; Pereira B; Watson SL; Baker JS; Chiambaretta F; Navel V
Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 100(5):e1061-e1073. PubMed ID: 35411680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Long-term Visual Outcomes Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty.
Fuest M; Ang M; Htoon HM; Tan D; Mehta JS
Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 182():62-71. PubMed ID: 28739420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Retrospective review of graft dislocation rate associated with descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty after primary failed penetrating keratoplasty.
Clements JL; Bouchard CS; Lee WB; Dunn SP; Mannis MJ; Reidy JJ; John T; Hannush SB; Goins KM; Wagoner MD; Adi MA; Rubenstein JB; Udell IJ; Babiuch AS
Cornea; 2011 Apr; 30(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 21099405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Corneal transplant rejection rate and severity after endothelial keratoplasty.
Allan BD; Terry MA; Price FW; Price MO; Griffin NB; Claesson M
Cornea; 2007 Oct; 26(9):1039-42. PubMed ID: 17893530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: a successful alternative to repeat penetrating keratoplasty.
Lee BS; Stark WJ; Jun AS
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Apr; 39(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 21070545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The First 100 Eyes of Standardized Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Standardized Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.
Hamzaoglu EC; Straiko MD; Mayko ZM; Sáles CS; Terry MA
Ophthalmology; 2015 Nov; 122(11):2193-9. PubMed ID: 26271841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical outcome of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in 18 cases with iridocorneal endothelial syndrome.
Ao M; Feng Y; Xiao G; Xu Y; Hong J
Eye (Lond); 2018 Apr; 32(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29243737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Non stripping descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in difficult cases: A case series.
Elahi S; Mazharian A; Panthier C; Gatinel D
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2021 May; 44(5):687-692. PubMed ID: 33752900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
