These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37609441)

  • 1. Rewarding outcomes enhance attentional capture and delay attentional disengagement.
    Yan M; Meng Z; Hu N; Chen A
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15868. PubMed ID: 37609441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Working memory components modulation of attentional disengagement from evaluative distractor.
    Yan M; Tian Y; Hai M; Zhang B; Chen A
    Psych J; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38530871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluative distractors modulate attentional disengagement: People would rather stay longer on rewards.
    Yan M; Li Q; Long Q; Xu L; Hu N; Chen A
    J Vis; 2022 Jul; 22(8):12. PubMed ID: 35848902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Delayed disengagement of attention from distractors signalling reward.
    Watson P; Pearson D; Theeuwes J; Most SB; Le Pelley ME
    Cognition; 2020 Feb; 195():104125. PubMed ID: 31751815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pavlovian reward learning underlies value driven attentional capture.
    Bucker B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):415-428. PubMed ID: 27905069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional disengagement effect based on relevant features.
    Hao Y; Zhang Q; Wang Z; Sun M
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():960183. PubMed ID: 36438363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional capture by signals of reward persists following outcome devaluation.
    Watson P; Pavri Y; Le J; Pearson D; Le Pelley ME
    Learn Mem; 2022 Jul; 29(7):181-191. PubMed ID: 35820792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contributions of gains and losses to attentional capture and disengagement: evidence from the gap paradigm.
    Zhuang R; Tu Y; Wang X; Ren Y; Abrams RA
    Exp Brain Res; 2021 Nov; 239(11):3381-3395. PubMed ID: 34495366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Value-modulated attentional capture is augmented by win-related sensory cues.
    Pearson D; Piao M; Le Pelley ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jan; 77(1):133-143. PubMed ID: 36803153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial task relevance modulates value-driven attentional capture.
    Ma X; Abrams RA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):1826-1844. PubMed ID: 35732924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Miss it and miss out: Counterproductive nonspatial attentional capture by task-irrelevant, value-related stimuli.
    Le Pelley ME; Seabrooke T; Kennedy BL; Pearson D; Most SB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1628-1642. PubMed ID: 28584955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative contributions of oculomotor capture and disengagement to distractor-related dwell times in visual search.
    Stefani M; Sauter M
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):16676. PubMed ID: 37794059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Components of reward-driven attentional capture.
    Sha LZ; Jiang YV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):403-14. PubMed ID: 26676872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eating restraint is associated with reduced attentional capture by signals of valuable food reward.
    Watson P; Vasudevan A; Pearson D; Le Pelley ME
    Appetite; 2021 Apr; 159():105050. PubMed ID: 33249010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional capture by Pavlovian reward-signalling distractors in visual search persists when rewards are removed.
    Watson P; Pearson D; Most SB; Theeuwes J; Wiers RW; Le Pelley ME
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226284. PubMed ID: 31830126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task relevance and negative reward modulate the disengagement deficit of patients with spatial neglect.
    Bourgeois A; Marti E; Schnider A; Ptak R
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Oct; 175():108365. PubMed ID: 36058282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Capture or suppression? Attentional allocation upon reward and loss-associated nonsalient distractors are supported by distinct neural mechanisms: An EEG study.
    Jiang Y; Cui C; Liu M; Zhang X
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Jul; 157():107879. PubMed ID: 33957194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissociable neural mechanisms underlie value-driven and selection-driven attentional capture.
    Kim H; Anderson BA
    Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 1708():109-115. PubMed ID: 30468726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective Distractor Information Reduces Reward-Related Attentional Capture.
    Mahlberg J; Pearson D; Le Pelley ME; Watson P
    J Cogn; 2024; 7(1):50. PubMed ID: 38910876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physical Salience and Value-Driven Salience Operate through Different Neural Mechanisms to Enhance Attentional Selection.
    Bachman MD; Wang L; Gamble ML; Woldorff MG
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jul; 40(28):5455-5464. PubMed ID: 32471878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.