These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37609441)

  • 41. The time course of attentional capture under dual-task conditions.
    Santangelo V; Botta F; Lupiáñez J; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 21258904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Reward predictions bias attentional selection.
    Anderson BA; Laurent PA; Yantis S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():262. PubMed ID: 23781185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Prioritized attentional processing: Acute stress, memory and stimulus emotionality facilitate attentional disengagement.
    Wirz L; Schwabe L
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107334. PubMed ID: 31923526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Working Memory Load Enhances the Attentional Capture of Low Reward History.
    Wu Y; Li T; Qu Z
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2722. PubMed ID: 31866909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Temporal expectations modulate attentional capture.
    Lamy D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Dec; 12(6):1112-9. PubMed ID: 16615337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Learning to avoid looking: Competing influences of reward on overt attentional selection.
    Pearson D; Le Pelley ME
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Oct; 27(5):998-1005. PubMed ID: 32607848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Overt attentional capture by reward-related stimuli overcomes inhibitory suppression.
    Pearson D; Watson P; Cheng PX; Le Pelley ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 May; 46(5):489-501. PubMed ID: 32191108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Performance-dependent reward hurts performance: The non-monotonic attentional load modulation on task-irrelevant distractor processing.
    He X; Liu W; Qin N; Lyu L; Dong X; Bao M
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Dec; 58(12):e13920. PubMed ID: 34383329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The time course of attentional disengagement from angry faces in social anxiety.
    Moriya J; Tanno Y
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2011 Mar; 42(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 20797697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of abrupt-onset and color singleton distractors: Evidence from event-related potential studies.
    Chen X; Xu B; Chen Y; Zeng X; Zhang Y; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14290. PubMed ID: 36946491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. You do it to yourself: Attentional capture by threat-signaling stimuli persists even when entirely counterproductive.
    Mikhael S; Watson P; Anderson BA; Le Pelley ME
    Emotion; 2021 Dec; 21(8):1691-1698. PubMed ID: 34843309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Reward learning modulates the attentional processing of faces in children with and without autism spectrum disorder.
    Li T; Wang X; Pan J; Feng S; Gong M; Wu Y; Li G; Li S; Yi L
    Autism Res; 2017 Nov; 10(11):1797-1807. PubMed ID: 28608397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Capture and Control: Working Memory Modulates Attentional Capture by Reward-Related Stimuli.
    Watson P; Pearson D; Chow M; Theeuwes J; Wiers RW; Most SB; Le Pelley ME
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1174-1185. PubMed ID: 31268837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Attention Capture of Non-target Emotional Faces: An Evidence From Reward Learning.
    Zhou X; Du B; Wei Z; He W
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():3004. PubMed ID: 32082205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Nonspatial interdimensional attentional capture.
    Inukai T; Kawahara J; Kumada T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):658-66. PubMed ID: 20348572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Can salient stimuli really be suppressed?
    Chang S; Egeth HE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):260-269. PubMed ID: 33241528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.