These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Chick colour approach preferences are altered by cold stress; colour pecking and approach preferences are the same. Davis SJ; Fischer GJ Anim Behav; 1978 Feb; 26(1):259-64. PubMed ID: 565177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Spontaneous preference for visual cues of animacy in naïve domestic chicks: The case of speed changes. Rosa-Salva O; Grassi M; Lorenzi E; Regolin L; Vallortigara G Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():49-60. PubMed ID: 27592411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Avian predators attack aposematic prey more forcefully when they are part of an aggregation. Skelhorn J; Ruxton GD Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):488-90. PubMed ID: 17148269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Preference for symmetry is experience dependent in newborn chicks (Gallus gallus). Clara E; Regolin L; Vallortigara G J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Jan; 33(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 17227191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accurate memory for colour but not pattern contrast in chicks. Osorio D; Jones CD; Vorobyev M Curr Biol; 1999 Feb; 9(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 10074430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The evolution of social orienting: evidence from chicks (Gallus gallus) and human newborns. Rosa Salva O; Farroni T; Regolin L; Vallortigara G; Johnson MH PLoS One; 2011 Apr; 6(4):e18802. PubMed ID: 21533093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evidence for a peak-shift in predator generalization among aposematic prey. Gamberale G; Tullberg BS Proc Biol Sci; 1996 Oct; 263(1375):1329-34. PubMed ID: 8914330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Colour vision of domestic chicks. Osorio D; Vorobyev M; Jones CD J Exp Biol; 1999 Nov; 202(Pt 21):2951-9. PubMed ID: 10518476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cryptic differences in colour among Müllerian mimics: how can the visual capacities of predators and prey shape the evolution of wing colours? Llaurens V; Joron M; Théry M J Evol Biol; 2014 Mar; 27(3):531-40. PubMed ID: 24444083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Frequency-dependent taste-rejection by avian predation may select for defence chemical polymorphisms in aposematic prey. Skelhorn J; Rowe C Biol Lett; 2005 Dec; 1(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 17148243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The development of responses to novel-coloured objects in male and female domestic chicks. Vallortigara G; Regolin L; Zanforlin M Behav Processes; 1994 Apr; 31(2-3):219-29. PubMed ID: 24924935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Numerical magnitude, rather than individual bias, explains spatial numerical association in newborn chicks. Rugani R; Vallortigara G; Priftis K; Regolin L Elife; 2020 Jun; 9():. PubMed ID: 32584257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ontogenetic colour change and the evolution of aposematism: a case study in panic moth caterpillars. Grant JB J Anim Ecol; 2007 May; 76(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 17439461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Sensory generalization and learning about novel colours by poultry chicks. Osorio D; Ham AD; Gonda Z; Andrew RJ Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1249-56. PubMed ID: 19235098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]