These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3761082)

  • 1. Bacterial contamination rates for non-clean-catch and clean-catch midstream urine collections in boys.
    Lohr JA; Donowitz LG; Dudley SM
    J Pediatr; 1986 Oct; 109(4):659-60. PubMed ID: 3761082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bacterial contamination rates for non-clean-catch and clean-catch midstream urine collections in uncircumcised boys.
    Saez-Llorens X; Umana MA; Odio CM; Lohr JA
    J Pediatr; 1989 Jan; 114(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 2909712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the clean-catch midstream void procedure necessary for obtaining urine culture specimens from men?
    Lipsky BA; Inui TS; Plorde JJ; Berger RE
    Am J Med; 1984 Feb; 76(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 6695949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. To clean or not to clean: effect on contamination rates in midstream urine collections in toilet-trained children.
    Vaillancourt S; McGillivray D; Zhang X; Kramer MS
    Pediatrics; 2007 Jun; 119(6):e1288-93. PubMed ID: 17502345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of urine contamination rates using three different methods of collection: clean-catch, cotton wool pad and urine bag.
    Alam MT; Coulter JB; Pacheco J; Correia JB; Ribeiro MG; Coelho MF; Bunn JE
    Ann Trop Paediatr; 2005 Mar; 25(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 15814046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of urine sampling technique: bacterial contamination of samples from women students.
    Baerheim A; Digranes A; Hunskaar S
    Br J Gen Pract; 1992 Jun; 42(359):241-3. PubMed ID: 1419246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accidental and Unintentional Findings From the Midstream Clean-Catch Urine Contamination Study: Insights From Applying the Behavior Engineering Model.
    Castner J
    J Emerg Nurs; 2019 Sep; 45(5):484-487. PubMed ID: 31445625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Urine Trouble: Reducing Midstream Clean Catch Urine Contamination Among Children 3-17 Years Old.
    Hoover AC; Segal RS; Zimmerman MB; Lee-Son K; Porterfield HS; Stewart SA; Rysavy MA
    Pediatrics; 2021 Aug; 148(2):. PubMed ID: 34244453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bacterial contamination rates in voided urine collections in girls.
    Lohr JA; Donowitz LG; Dudley SM
    J Pediatr; 1989 Jan; 114(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 2909711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The myth of the clean catch urine specimen.
    Immergut MA; Gilbert EC; Frensilli FJ; Goble M
    Urology; 1981 Apr; 17(4):339-40. PubMed ID: 7222324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contamination rates of three urine-sampling methods to assess bacteriuria in pregnant women.
    Schneeberger C; van den Heuvel ER; Erwich JJHM; Stolk RP; Visser CE; Geerlings SE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Feb; 121(2 Pt 1):299-305. PubMed ID: 23344279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does a clean-catch urine sample reduce bacterial contamination?
    Leisure MK; Dudley SM; Donowitz LG
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Jan; 328(4):289-90. PubMed ID: 8418419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Urine Contamination in Nontoilet-trained and Uncircumcised Boys.
    Ballouhey Q; Fourcade L; Couve-Deacon E; Cros J; Lescure V; Bahans C; Chainier D; Garnier F; Guigonis V
    Urology; 2016 Sep; 95():171-4. PubMed ID: 27289027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outpatient urine culture: does collection technique matter?
    Lifshitz E; Kramer L
    Arch Intern Med; 2000 Sep; 160(16):2537-40. PubMed ID: 10979067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The reliability of midstream urine culture from circumcised male infants.
    Amir J; Ginzburg M; Straussberg R; Varsano I
    Am J Dis Child; 1993 Sep; 147(9):969-70. PubMed ID: 8362814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative study on bacterial cultures of urine samples obtained by clean-void technique versus urethral catheterization.
    Lau AY; Wong SN; Yip KT; Fong KW; Li SP; Que TL
    Acta Paediatr; 2007 Mar; 96(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 17407472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Getting better urine specimens with the clean-catch midstream technique.
    McGuckin MB
    Nursing; 1981 Jan; 11(1):72-3. PubMed ID: 6904887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perineal cleansing and individual sterilised packs are not necessary for collecting midstream urine specimens.
    Pearman JW; Perry PL; Sedgley GI; Rausch SJ
    Med J Aust; 1993 Mar; 158(5):361. PubMed ID: 8474391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving clean-catch contamination rates: A prospective interventional cohort study.
    Teo S; Cheek JA; Craig S
    Emerg Med Australas; 2016 Dec; 28(6):698-703. PubMed ID: 27778452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New method for obtaining uncontaminated urine from women.
    Cade R; Raulerson JD; Mahoney JJ; Duprey P; Privette M; Phelan MC; Beers H; Fuller TJ; Juncos LI; Grubb WG
    South Med J; 1978 Dec; 71(12):1536-9. PubMed ID: 725634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.