121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37611325)
1. Effects of noise and noise reduction on audiovisual speech perception in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
Layer N; Abdel-Latif KHA; Radecke JO; Müller V; Weglage A; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
Clin Neurophysiol; 2023 Oct; 154():141-156. PubMed ID: 37611325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The timecourse of multisensory speech processing in unilaterally stimulated cochlear implant users revealed by ERPs.
Layer N; Weglage A; Müller V; Meister H; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Murray MM; Sandmann P
Neuroimage Clin; 2022; 34():102982. PubMed ID: 35303598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.
Weglage A; Layer N; Meister H; Müller V; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Strength of Attentional Modulation on Cortical Auditory Evoked Responses Correlates with Speech-in-Noise Performance in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
Lee JH; Shim H; Gantz B; Choi I
Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221141143. PubMed ID: 36464791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ForwardFocus with cochlear implant recipients in spatially separated and fluctuating competing signals - introduction of a reference metric.
Hey M; Hocke T; Böhnke B; Mauger SJ
Int J Audiol; 2019 Dec; 58(12):869-878. PubMed ID: 31464542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Event-Related Potentials of Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users: Using a Semantic Oddball Paradigm in Noise.
Voola M; Wedekind A; Nguyen AT; Marinovic W; Rajan G; Tavora-Vieira D
Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(4):280-293. PubMed ID: 36940674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Study of Event-Related Potentials During Monaural and Bilateral Hearing in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.
Voola M; Nguyen AT; Wedekind A; Marinovic W; Rajan G; Tavora-Vieira D
Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):842-853. PubMed ID: 36706105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Restoration of cortical symmetry and binaural function: Cortical auditory evoked responses in adult cochlear implant users with single sided deafness.
Wedekind A; Rajan G; Van Dun B; Távora-Vieira D
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227371. PubMed ID: 31935234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Audio-visual speech perception in noise: Implanted children and young adults versus normal hearing peers.
Taitelbaum-Swead R; Fostick L
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jan; 92():146-150. PubMed ID: 28012517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech Intelligibility and Spatial Release From Masking Improvements Using Spatial Noise Reduction Algorithms in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
Zedan A; Jürgens T; Williges B; Kollmeier B; Wiebe K; Galindo J; Wesarg T
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211005931. PubMed ID: 33926327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Event-related potentials for better speech perception in noise by cochlear implant users.
Soshi T; Hisanaga S; Kodama N; Kanekama Y; Samejima Y; Yumoto E; Sekiyama K
Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():110-21. PubMed ID: 25158303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of Binaural Beamforming Technology on Speech Intelligibility in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; Dingemanse JG; van Immerzeel T; van der Schroeff MP
Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 29936510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Criteria for Selecting an Optimal Device for the Contralateral Ear of Children with a Unilateral Cochlear Implant.
Jeong SW; Kang MY; Kim LS
Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(5):314-21. PubMed ID: 26277845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Audiovisual segregation in cochlear implant users.
Landry S; Bacon BA; Leybaert J; Gagné JP; Champoux F
PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e33113. PubMed ID: 22427963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Within- and across-frequency temporal processing and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
Blankenship CM; Meinzen-Derr J; Zhang F
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275772. PubMed ID: 36227872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
