These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37611325)

  • 21. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
    Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electrophysiological differences and similarities in audiovisual speech processing in CI users with unilateral and bilateral hearing loss.
    Layer N; Weglage A; Müller V; Meister H; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Murray MM; Sandmann P
    Curr Res Neurobiol; 2022; 3():100059. PubMed ID: 36405629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Aging Effects on Cortical Responses to Tones and Speech in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Xie Z; Stakhovskaya O; Goupell MJ; Anderson S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 22(6):719-740. PubMed ID: 34231111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.
    Oxenham AJ; Kreft HA
    Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jahn KN; Stevenson RA; Wallace MT
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Side-of-Implantation Effect on Functional Asymmetry in the Auditory Cortex of Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Weglage A; Müller V; Layer N; Abdel-Latif KHA; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
    Brain Topogr; 2022 Jul; 35(4):431-452. PubMed ID: 35668310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
    Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perceptual organization of sequential stimuli in cochlear implant listeners: A temporal processing approach.
    Saki N; Nikakhlagh S; Mirmomeni G; Bayat A
    Int Tinnitus J; 2019 Jan; 23(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 31469526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Beta-band activity in auditory pathways reflects speech localization and recognition in bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Senkowski D; Pomper U; Fitzner I; Engel AK; Kral A
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Jul; 35(7):3107-21. PubMed ID: 24123535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of adaptive beamforming and noise reduction algorithms on speech intelligibility and noise tolerance in bimodal cochlear implant users.
    Michels A; Oukheira Y; Brendel M; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Wesarg T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 May; 23(3):148-157. PubMed ID: 35193474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users.
    Marcrum SC; Picou EM; Steffens T
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Enhancing Cochlear Implant Outcomes across Age Groups: The Interplay of Forward Focus and Advanced Combination Encoder Coding Strategies in Noisy Conditions.
    Wagner TM; Wagner L; Plontke SK; Rahne T
    J Clin Med; 2024 Feb; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 38592239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Investigating Speech Recognition and listening effort with different device configurations in adult cochlear implant users.
    Sladen DP; Nie Y; Berg K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):119-130. PubMed ID: 29457564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Noise alters beta-band activity in superior temporal cortex during audiovisual speech processing.
    Schepers IM; Schneider TR; Hipp JF; Engel AK; Senkowski D
    Neuroimage; 2013 Apr; 70():101-12. PubMed ID: 23274182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do the minimum and maximum comfortable stimulation levels influence the cortical potential latencies or the speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users?
    Martins KVC; Goffi-Gomez MVS; Tsuji RK; Bento RF
    Hear Res; 2021 May; 404():108206. PubMed ID: 33677193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.