These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37611742)

  • 1. Minimally invasive, surgical, and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A network meta-analysis.
    Awad AK; Ahmed A; Mathew DM; Varghese KS; Mathew SM; Khaja S; Newell PC; Okoh AK; Hirji S
    J Cardiol; 2024 Mar; 83(3):177-183. PubMed ID: 37611742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally Invasive Versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
    Ahmed A; Awad AK; Varghese KS; Mathew J; Huda S; George J; Mathew S; Abdelnasser OA; Awad AK; Mathew DM
    Innovations (Phila); 2023; 18(5):424-434. PubMed ID: 37658743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis patients at low to moderate surgical risk: a comprehensive meta-analysis.
    Elmaraezy A; Ismail A; Abushouk AI; Eltoomy M; Saad S; Negida A; Abdelaty OM; Abdallah AR; Aboelfotoh AM; Hassan HM; Elmaraezy AG; Morsi M; Althaher F; Althaher M; AlSafadi AM
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Aug; 17(1):234. PubMed ID: 28836953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low-Risk Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement - An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Anantha-Narayanan M; Kandasamy VV; Reddy YN; Megaly M; Baskaran J; Pershad A; Suri RM; Garcia S
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):441-452. PubMed ID: 31678116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-surgical-risk patients: An updated meta-analysis.
    Goel S; Pasam RT; Wats K; Patel J; Chava S; Gotesman J; Malik BA; Frankel R; Shani J; Gidwani U
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 96(1):169-178. PubMed ID: 31631514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk surgical patients: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Kheiri B; Osman M; Abubakar H; Subahi A; Chahine A; Ahmed S; Bachuwa G; Alkotob ML; Hassan M; Bhatt DL
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Oct; 20(10):838-842. PubMed ID: 30638890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk.
    Kolkailah AA; Doukky R; Pelletier MP; Volgman AS; Kaneko T; Nabhan AF
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Dec; 12(12):CD013319. PubMed ID: 31860123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in moderate and high-risk patients: a meta-analysis.
    Carnero-Alcázar M; Maroto LC; Cobiella-Carnicer J; Vilacosta I; Nombela-Franco L; Alswies A; Villagrán-Medinilla E; Macaya C
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Apr; 51(4):644-652. PubMed ID: 28007879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Renal outcomes in valve-in-valve transcatheter versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Arjomandi Rad A; Naruka V; Vardanyan R; Salmasi MY; Tasoudis PT; Kendall S; Casula R; Athanasiou T
    J Card Surg; 2022 Nov; 37(11):3743-3753. PubMed ID: 36040611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison on the prognosis of severe aortic stenosis patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis].
    Fan P; Ye YZ; Ma X
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2022 Sep; 50(9):913-919. PubMed ID: 36096710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A meta-analysis and meta-regression of long-term outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis.
    Villablanca PA; Mathew V; Thourani VH; Rodés-Cabau J; Bangalore S; Makkiya M; Vlismas P; Briceno DF; Slovut DP; Taub CC; McCarthy PM; Augoustides JG; Ramakrishna H
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 225():234-243. PubMed ID: 27732927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acute kidney injury after aortic valve replacement in a nationally representative cohort in the USA.
    Kumar N; Garg N
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2019 Feb; 34(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 29684164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Al-Abdouh A; Upadhrasta S; Fashanu O; Elias H; Zhao D; Hasan RK; Michos ED
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):461-466. PubMed ID: 31447314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Swift SL; Puehler T; Misso K; Lang SH; Forbes C; Kleijnen J; Danner M; Kuhn C; Haneya A; Seoudy H; Cremer J; Frey N; Lutter G; Wolff R; Scheibler F; Wehkamp K; Frank D
    BMJ Open; 2021 Dec; 11(12):e054222. PubMed ID: 34873012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low- and intermediate-risk patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ueshima D; Fovino LN; D'Amico G; Brener SJ; Esposito G; Tarantini G
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2019 Jul; 34(3):216-225. PubMed ID: 30232711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Low-Intermediate Surgical Risk Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Garg A; Rao SV; Visveswaran G; Agrawal S; Sharma A; Garg L; Mahata I; Garg J; Singal D; Cohen M; Kostis JB
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 29(6):209-216. PubMed ID: 28570236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients.
    Kolte D; Vlahakes GJ; Palacios IF; Sakhuja R; Passeri JJ; Inglessis I; Elmariah S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2019 Sep; 74(12):1532-1540. PubMed ID: 31537261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: An updated meta-analysis comparing midterm outcomes.
    Thandra A; Abusnina W; Jhand A; Shaikh K; Bansal R; Pajjuru VS; Al-Abdouh A; Kanmanthareddy A; Alla VM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jun; 97(7):1481-1488. PubMed ID: 33580743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of postprocedural new-onset atrial fibrillation between transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 16 randomized controlled trials.
    Ding Y; Wan M; Zhang H; Wang C; Dai Z
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jul; 100(28):e26613. PubMed ID: 34260547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: Evidence from a meta-analysis.
    Sardar P; Kundu A; Chatterjee S; Feldman DN; Owan T; Kakouros N; Nairooz R; Pape LA; Feldman T; Dawn Abbott J; Elmariah S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 90(3):504-515. PubMed ID: 28398671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.