These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37611742)

  • 41. Transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement and medical treatment : Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials.
    Ak A; Porokhovnikov I; Kuethe F; Schulze PC; Noutsias M; Schlattmann P
    Herz; 2018 Jun; 43(4):325-337. PubMed ID: 28451702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery Expert Consensus Statement on Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Propensity-Matched Studies.
    Thourani VH; Edelman JJ; Holmes SD; Nguyen TC; Carroll J; Mack MJ; Kapadia S; Tang GHL; Kodali S; Kaneko T; Meduri CU; Forcillo J; Ferdinand FD; Fontana G; Suwalski P; Kiaii B; Balkhy H; Kempfert J; Cheung A; Borger MA; Reardon M; Leon MB; Popma JJ; Ad N
    Innovations (Phila); 2021; 16(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 33491539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Surgical vs transfemoral aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients: An updated meta-analysis of trial and registry data.
    Luthra S; Leiva-Juárez MM; Ohri SK
    J Card Surg; 2020 Sep; 35(9):2264-2274. PubMed ID: 32652702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Contemporary Trends and Outcomes of Percutaneous and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Cancer.
    Guha A; Dey AK; Arora S; Cavender MA; Vavalle JP; Sabik JF; Jimenez E; Jneid H; Addison D
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2020 Jan; 9(2):e014248. PubMed ID: 31960751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.
    Elbadawi A; Saad M; Elgendy IY; Barssoum K; Omer MA; Soliman A; Almahmoud MF; Ogunbayo GO; Mentias A; Gilani S; Jneid H; Aronow HD; Kleiman N; Abbott JD
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Sep; 12(18):1811-1822. PubMed ID: 31537280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of in-hospital outcomes and readmissions for valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs. reoperative surgical aortic valve replacement: a contemporary assessment of real-world outcomes.
    Hirji SA; Percy ED; Zogg CK; Malarczyk A; Harloff MT; Yazdchi F; Kaneko T
    Eur Heart J; 2020 Aug; 41(29):2747-2755. PubMed ID: 32445575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Transcatheter vs surgical aortic-valve replacement in low- to intermediate-surgical-risk candidates: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Khan SU; Lone AN; Saleem MA; Kaluski E
    Clin Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 40(11):974-981. PubMed ID: 29168984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Transcatheter or Surgical Replacement for Failed Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves.
    Tran JH; Itagaki S; Zeng Q; Leon MB; O'Gara PT; Mack MJ; Gillinov AM; El-Hamamsy I; Tang GHL; Mikami T; Bagiella E; Moskowitz AJ; Adams DH; Gelijns AC; Borger MA; Egorova NN
    JAMA Cardiol; 2024 Jul; 9(7):631-639. PubMed ID: 38776106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Hofer F; Hengstenberg C; Goliasch G; Grygier M; Mascherbauer J; Siller-Matula JM
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 109(6):761-775. PubMed ID: 31863174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Long-Term Results Following Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
    Caminiti R; Ielasi A; Vetta G; Parlavecchio A; Rocca DGD; Glauber M; Tespili M; Vizzari G; Micari A
    Am J Cardiol; 2024 Nov; 230():6-13. PubMed ID: 39173988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Meta-analysis of phase-specific survival after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement from randomized control trials.
    Yokoyama Y; Shimoda T; Sloan B; Takagi H; Fukuhara S; Kuno T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2024 Sep; 168(3):796-808.e27. PubMed ID: 37149212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Complications After Self-expanding Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Conte JV; Hermiller J; Resar JR; Deeb GM; Gleason TG; Adams DH; Popma JJ; Yakubov SJ; Watson D; Guo J; Zorn GL; Reardon MJ
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Autumn; 29(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 29195573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Minimally Invasive Versus Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity Matched Study.
    Terwelp MD; Thourani VH; Zhao Y; Balan P; Loghin C; Ocazionez D; Estrera A; Hoffmann CT; Babaliaros VC; Lamelas J; Nguyen TC
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 Mar; 26(2):146-154. PubMed ID: 28820543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Meta-Analysis Comparing Renal Outcomes after Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Shah K; Chaker Z; Busu T; Shah R; Osman M; Alqahtani F; Alkhouli M
    J Interv Cardiol; 2019; 2019():3537256. PubMed ID: 31772526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparative analysis of cerebrovascular events in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.
    Mohananey D; Sengodan P; Banerjee K; Kumar A; Jobanputra Y; Sankaramangalam K; Krishnaswamy A; Mick S; White JM; Svensson LG; Kapadia SR
    EuroIntervention; 2018 May; 14(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 29437037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Outcomes of intermediate-risk patients treated with transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: A single center 20-year experience.
    Garcia S; Kelly R; Mbai M; Gurevich S; Oestreich B; Yannopoulos D; Adabag S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):390-398. PubMed ID: 29316204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Differences in left ventricular remodelling in patients with aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement with corevalve prostheses compared to surgery with porcine or bovine biological prostheses.
    Ngo A; Hassager C; Thyregod HGH; Søndergaard L; Olsen PS; Steinbrüchel D; Hansen PB; Kjærgaard J; Winther-Jensen M; Ihlemann N
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 19(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 28158582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sex-Specific Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: FDA Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Premarket Clinical Trials.
    Zusterzeel R; Mishra NK; Beydoun H; Laschinger J; Wu C; Dong LM; Lin JA; Marinac-Dabic D; Strauss DG; Caños DA
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2018 Jun; 27(6):808-814. PubMed ID: 29741978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Computed Tomography-Based Indexed Aortic Annulus Size to Predict Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.
    Head SJ; Reardon MJ; Deeb GM; Van Mieghem NM; Popma JJ; Gleason TG; Williams MR; Radhakrishnan S; Fremes S; Oh JK; Chang Y; Boulware MJ; Kappetein AP
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 12(4):e007396. PubMed ID: 30929507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Early and late pace-maker implantation after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Biancari F; Pykäri J; Savontaus M; Laine M; Husso A; Virtanen M; Maaranen P; Niemelä M; Mäkikallio T; Tauriainen T; Eskola M; Raivio P; Valtola A; Juvonen T; Airaksinen J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Mar; 97(4):E560-E568. PubMed ID: 32767643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.