These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37612195)

  • 1. Accuracy of digital and conventional systems in locating occlusal contacts: A clinical study.
    Rovira-Lastra B; Khoury-Ribas L; Flores-Orozco EI; Ayuso-Montero R; Chaurasia A; Martinez-Gomis J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):115-122. PubMed ID: 37612195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of contacts calculated from 3D images of occlusal surfaces.
    DeLong R; Knorr S; Anderson GC; Hodges J; Pintado MR
    J Dent; 2007 Jun; 35(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 17418474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical study comparing the accuracy of interocclusal records, digitally obtained by three different devices.
    Fraile C; Ferreiroa A; Romeo M; Alonso R; Pradíes G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1957-1962. PubMed ID: 34519908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of the agreement between virtual and clinical occlusal registrations: A comparative clinical study.
    Biadsee A; Biadsee A; Khalifa A; Mtanis T; Ormianer Z
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37612193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Number and localization of occlusal contact areas on natural posterior teeth without dental findings - evaluations of the regional baseline study (SHIP-1) with the Greifswald Digital Analyzing System (GEDAS).
    Kordaß B; Amlang A; Hugger A; Behrendt C; Ruge S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Mar; 25(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 35322652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of a conventional and virtual occlusal record.
    Solaberrieta E; Otegi JR; Goicoechea N; Brizuela A; Pradies G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 25858220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the presence of an occlusal indicator product affect the contact forces between full dentitions?
    Mitchem JA; Katona TR; Moser EAS
    J Oral Rehabil; 2017 Oct; 44(10):791-799. PubMed ID: 28681442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of recording static and dynamic occlusal contact marks using transparent acetate sheet.
    Davies S; Al-Ani Z; Jeremiah H; Winston D; Smith P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):458-61. PubMed ID: 16275307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A digital poll of dentists testing the accuracy of paper mark subjective interpretation.
    Sutter BA
    Cranio; 2018 Nov; 36(6):396-403. PubMed ID: 28792294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complete assessment of occlusal dynamics and establishment of a digital workflow by using target tracking with a three-dimensional facial scanner.
    Kim JE; Park JH; Moon HS; Shim JS
    J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):120-124. PubMed ID: 30446410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical reproducibility of GEDAS--"Greifswald Digital Analyzing System" for displaying occlusal contact patterns.
    Hützen D; Rebau M; Kordass B
    Int J Comput Dent; 2006 Apr; 9(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 16955651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and Validity of T-scan and 3D Intraoral Scanning for Measuring the Occlusal Contact Area.
    Ayuso-Montero R; Mariano-Hernandez Y; Khoury-Ribas L; Rovira-Lastra B; Willaert E; Martinez-Gomis J
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jan; 29(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 31270888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Number of occlusal contacts during maximum intercuspation in dentate adults: A systematised review.
    Qadeer S; Türp JC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2023 Jul; 50(7):617-626. PubMed ID: 36943389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of eccentric tooth contact on a semi-adjustable articulator by using an occlusal analysis system.
    Jeong MY; Kim MJ; Lim YJ; Kwon HB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 35246320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of occlusal collision corrections completed by two intraoral scanners or a dental design program on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship.
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Yilmaz B; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):191-203. PubMed ID: 37365066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of the evaluation of occlusal contacts in the intercuspal position.
    Anderson GC; Schulte JK; Aeppli DM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Oct; 70(4):320-3. PubMed ID: 8229882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The balance of occlusal contacts during intercuspation using T-scan system].
    Nabeshima F; Tanaka M; Kawano W; Saratani K; Yanagida M; Kawazoe T
    Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Apr; 34(2):340-9. PubMed ID: 2134787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Customized procedure to display T-Scan occlusal contacts.
    Solaberrieta E; Etxaniz O; Otegi JR; Brizuela A; Pradies G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 27475919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation in normal dentitions.
    McDevitt WE; Warreth AA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Oct; 24(10):725-34. PubMed ID: 9372462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.