These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37612195)

  • 21. Accuracy of occlusal contacts for crowns with chairside CAD/CAM techniques.
    Fasbinder DJ; Poticny DJ
    Int J Comput Dent; 2010; 13(4):303-16. PubMed ID: 21323011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Clinical study on the accuracy of occlusal contacts on digital model].
    Liu HL; Liu XG; Tian YM; Ni L; Zheng DX
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 55(10):737-742. PubMed ID: 33045784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Accuracy of Transferring Casts in Maximal Intercuspal Position to a Virtual Articulator.
    He M; Ding Q; Li L; Yang G; Zhao Y; Sun Y; Zhang L
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):326-332. PubMed ID: 34196456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation using the T-Scan system.
    Garrido García VC; García Cartagena A; González Sequeros O
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Dec; 24(12):899-903. PubMed ID: 9467991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of Maximum Intercuspal Contacts of Articulated Casts and Virtual Casts Requiring Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures.
    Arslan Y; Bankoğlu Güngör M; Karakoca Nemli S; Kökdoğan Boyacı B; Aydın C
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):594-598. PubMed ID: 26848940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The T-SCAN System in Evaluating Occlusal Contacts.
    Bozhkova TP
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2016; 58(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 27552789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reference values and reliability of occlusal force distribution and occlusal time measured by the T-Scan system in adults with healthy dentition.
    Rubió-Ferrer G; Rovira-Lastra B; Khoury-Ribas L; Flores-Orozco EI; Ayuso-Montero R; Martinez-Gomis J
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jul; 33(6):558-564. PubMed ID: 38469973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pattern of occlusal contacts in lateral excursions (canine protection or group function).
    Sapkota B; Gupta A
    Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2014; 12(45):43-7. PubMed ID: 25219993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of two methods for occlusal contact registration with the T-Scan system.
    Garcia Cartagena A; Gonzalez Sequeros O; Garrido Garcia VC
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jun; 24(6):426-32. PubMed ID: 9219986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative Study Qualitative and Quantitative Techniques in the Study of Occlusion.
    Bozhkova T; Musurlieva N; Slavchev D
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():1163874. PubMed ID: 34604379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy and precision of occlusal contacts of stereolithographic casts mounted by digital interocclusal registrations.
    Krahenbuhl JT; Cho SH; Irelan J; Bansal NK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 27068319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of load and indicator type upon occlusal contact markings.
    Saad MN; Weiner G; Ehrenberg D; Weiner S
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2008 Apr; 85(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17618516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In vivo evaluation of T-Scan in quantifying occlusal contact.
    Wang Q; Zhao Z; Li J; Zhao R; Zhou M; Tang K; Bai S; Ma C; Wang F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2024 Sep; 51(9):1675-1683. PubMed ID: 38926933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contact point marking with the OccluSense system-an in vitro study on reliability and validity.
    Popa S; Ahlers MO
    J Oral Rehabil; 2024 Sep; 51(9):1662-1674. PubMed ID: 38943246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computer modeling of occlusal surfaces of posterior teeth with the CICERO CAD/CAM system.
    Olthoff LW; Van Der Zel JM; De Ruiter WJ; Vlaar ST; Bosman F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 10946332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A technique for verifying the accuracy of the virtual mounting of digital scans against the actual occlusal contacts.
    Seo JM; Oh WS; Lee JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):729-732. PubMed ID: 30580979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Computerized occlusal analysis as an alternative occlusal indicator.
    Afrashtehfar KI; Qadeer S
    Cranio; 2016 Jan; 34(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 25323220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of three occlusal registration methods for guided closure contacts.
    Kong CV; Yang YL; Maness WL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jul; 66(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 1941668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relationship between the number of occlusal contacts and masticatory muscle activity in healthy young adults.
    Ferrario VF; Serrao G; Dellavia C; Caruso E; Sforza C
    Cranio; 2002 Apr; 20(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 12002835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of the Number of Teeth and Location of the Virtual Occlusal Record on the Accuracy of the Maxillo-Mandibular Relationship Obtained by Using An Intraoral Scanner.
    Revilla-León M; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Barmak AB; Att W; Kois JC
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):253-258. PubMed ID: 35448911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.