149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37615431)
41. MtHc: a motif-based hierarchical method for clustering massive 16S rRNA sequences into OTUs.
Wei ZG; Zhang SW
Mol Biosyst; 2015 Jul; 11(7):1907-13. PubMed ID: 25912934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Impact of DNA Sequencing and Analysis Methods on 16S rRNA Gene Bacterial Community Analysis of Dairy Products.
Xue Z; Kable ME; Marco ML
mSphere; 2018 Oct; 3(5):. PubMed ID: 30333179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Primer, Pipelines, Parameters: Issues in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing.
Abellan-Schneyder I; Matchado MS; Reitmeier S; Sommer A; Sewald Z; Baumbach J; List M; Neuhaus K
mSphere; 2021 Feb; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 33627512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Fragmentation and Coverage Variation in Viral Metagenome Assemblies, and Their Effect in Diversity Calculations.
García-López R; Vázquez-Castellanos JF; Moya A
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():141. PubMed ID: 26442255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. OTUs and ASVs Produce Comparable Taxonomic and Diversity from Shrimp Microbiota 16S Profiles Using Tailored Abundance Filters.
García-López R; Cornejo-Granados F; Lopez-Zavala AA; Cota-Huízar A; Sotelo-Mundo RR; Gómez-Gil B; Ochoa-Leyva A
Genes (Basel); 2021 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 33924545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Systematic evaluation of supervised machine learning for sample origin prediction using metagenomic sequencing data.
Chen JC; Tyler AD
Biol Direct; 2020 Dec; 15(1):29. PubMed ID: 33302990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Limits to robustness and reproducibility in the demarcation of operational taxonomic units.
Schmidt TS; Matias Rodrigues JF; von Mering C
Environ Microbiol; 2015 May; 17(5):1689-706. PubMed ID: 25156547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. IDTAXA: a novel approach for accurate taxonomic classification of microbiome sequences.
Murali A; Bhargava A; Wright ES
Microbiome; 2018 Aug; 6(1):140. PubMed ID: 30092815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49.
Regueira-Iglesias A; Vázquez-González L; Balsa-Castro C; Blanco-Pintos T; Martín-Biedma B; Arce VM; Carreira MJ; Tomás I
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2021; 11():770668. PubMed ID: 35223533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A Bayesian taxonomic classification method for 16S rRNA gene sequences with improved species-level accuracy.
Gao X; Lin H; Revanna K; Dong Q
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 18(1):247. PubMed ID: 28486927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Evaluation of PacBio sequencing for full-length bacterial 16S rRNA gene classification.
Wagner J; Coupland P; Browne HP; Lawley TD; Francis SC; Parkhill J
BMC Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):274. PubMed ID: 27842515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Sparse and compositionally robust inference of microbial ecological networks.
Kurtz ZD; Müller CL; Miraldi ER; Littman DR; Blaser MJ; Bonneau RA
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 May; 11(5):e1004226. PubMed ID: 25950956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Taxonomic annotation of 16S rRNA sequences of pig intestinal samples using MG-RAST and QIIME2 generated different microbiota compositions.
Lima J; Manning T; Rutherford KM; Baima ET; Dewhurst RJ; Walsh P; Roehe R
J Microbiol Methods; 2021 Jul; 186():106235. PubMed ID: 33974954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Reconciliation between operational taxonomic units and species boundaries.
Mysara M; Vandamme P; Props R; Kerckhof FM; Leys N; Boon N; Raes J; Monsieurs P
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2017 Apr; 93(4):. PubMed ID: 28334218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. BIOCOM-PIPE: a new user-friendly metabarcoding pipeline for the characterization of microbial diversity from 16S, 18S and 23S rRNA gene amplicons.
Djemiel C; Dequiedt S; Karimi B; Cottin A; Girier T; El Djoudi Y; Wincker P; Lelièvre M; Mondy S; Chemidlin Prévost-Bouré N; Maron PA; Ranjard L; Terrat S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Oct; 21(1):492. PubMed ID: 33129268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. MicroPheno: predicting environments and host phenotypes from 16S rRNA gene sequencing using a k-mer based representation of shallow sub-samples.
Asgari E; Garakani K; McHardy AC; Mofrad MRK
Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(13):i32-i42. PubMed ID: 29950008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Deciphering intra-species bacterial diversity of meat and seafood spoilage microbiota using gyrB amplicon sequencing: A comparative analysis with 16S rDNA V3-V4 amplicon sequencing.
Poirier S; Rué O; Peguilhan R; Coeuret G; Zagorec M; Champomier-Vergès MC; Loux V; Chaillou S
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204629. PubMed ID: 30252901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. MetaSquare: an integrated metadatabase of 16S rRNA gene amplicon for microbiome taxonomic classification.
Liao CC; Fu PY; Huang CW; Chuang CH; Yen Y; Lin CY; Chen SH
Bioinformatics; 2022 May; 38(10):2930-2931. PubMed ID: 35561196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A critical analysis of state-of-the-art metagenomics OTU clustering algorithms.
Bhat AH; Prabhu P; Balakrishnan K
J Biosci; 2019 Dec; 44(6):. PubMed ID: 31894129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Rumen Epithelial Communities Share a Core Bacterial Microbiota: A Meta-Analysis of 16S rRNA Gene Illumina MiSeq Sequencing Datasets.
Anderson CJ; Koester LR; Schmitz-Esser S
Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():625400. PubMed ID: 33790876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
