116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37615611)
1. Improving access to prosthetic limbs in Germany: An explorative review.
Baumann MF; Maria M
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2023 Oct; 47(5):486-493. PubMed ID: 37615611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experiences of lower limb prosthetic users in a rural setting in the Mpumalanga Province, South Africa.
Ennion L; Manig S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Apr; 43(2):170-179. PubMed ID: 30112980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Osseointegrated Prosthetic Implants for People With Lower-Limb Amputation: A Health Technology Assessment.
Ontario Health (Quality)
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2019; 19(7):1-126. PubMed ID: 31911825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current rates of prosthetic usage in upper-limb amputees - have innovations had an impact on device acceptance?
Salminger S; Stino H; Pichler LH; Gstoettner C; Sturma A; Mayer JA; Szivak M; Aszmann OC
Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Jul; 44(14):3708-3713. PubMed ID: 33377803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implications of prosthesis funding structures on the use of prostheses: experiences of individuals with upper limb absence.
Biddiss E; McKeever P; Lindsay S; Chau T
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 21515898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A survey on what Australians with upper limb difference want in a prosthesis: justification for using soft robotics and additive manufacturing for customized prosthetic hands.
Stephens-Fripp B; Jean Walker M; Goddard E; Alici G
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Apr; 15(3):342-349. PubMed ID: 30856031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Stakeholder perspectives for possible residual limb monitoring system for persons with lower-limb amputation.
Tran L; Caldwell R; Quigley M; Fatone S
Disabil Rehabil; 2020 Jan; 42(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 30182755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A review of user needs to drive the development of lower limb prostheses.
Manz S; Valette R; Damonte F; Avanci Gaudio L; Gonzalez-Vargas J; Sartori M; Dosen S; Rietman J
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Nov; 19(1):119. PubMed ID: 36335345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A User-Driven Approach to Prosthetic Upper Limb Development in Korea.
Ju N; Lee KH; Kim MO; Choi Y
Healthcare (Basel); 2021 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 34356217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards Including End-Users in the Design of Prosthetic Hands: Ethical Analysis of a Survey of Australians with Upper-Limb Difference.
Walker MJ; Goddard E; Stephens-Fripp B; Alici G
Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Apr; 26(2):981-1007. PubMed ID: 31832867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prosthesis satisfaction in a national sample of Veterans with upper limb amputation.
Resnik L; Borgia M; Heinemann AW; Clark MA
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Apr; 44(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 31960734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. User surveys support designing a prosthetic wrist that incorporates the Dart Thrower's Motion.
Davidson M; Bodine C; Weir RFF
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Apr; 14(3):312-315. PubMed ID: 29514521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experiences of persons with lower limb amputation after prosthetic rehabilitation in Ghana: A qualitative inquiry.
Dordunu R; Adjei CA; Kyei JM; Ani-Amponsah M
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2024 Jun; 48(3):329-336. PubMed ID: 37615618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Issues faced by people with amputation(s) during lower limb prosthetic rehabilitation: A thematic analysis.
Turner S; Belsi A; McGregor AH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Feb; 46(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34789709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving access to prosthetic services in Western Nepal: a local stakeholder perspective.
Farrar M; Niraula YR; Pryor W
Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Apr; 45(7):1229-1238. PubMed ID: 35387522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experience of adults with upper-limb difference and their views on sensory feedback for prostheses: a mixed methods study.
Jabban L; Metcalfe BW; Raines J; Zhang D; Ainsworth B
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jul; 19(1):80. PubMed ID: 35870940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A narrative review: current upper limb prosthetic options and design.
Trent L; Intintoli M; Prigge P; Bollinger C; Walters LS; Conyers D; Miguelez J; Ryan T
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Aug; 15(6):604-613. PubMed ID: 30973275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of a crossover prosthetic foot in active children with a congenital lower limb deficiency: an explorative study.
Verheul FJM; Verschuren O; Zwinkels M; Herwegh M; Michielsen A; de Haan M; van Wijk I
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Oct; 44(5):305-313. PubMed ID: 32370612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptive prosthetics for the lower extremity.
Carroll K
Foot Ankle Clin; 2001 Jun; 6(2):371-86. PubMed ID: 11488061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
