These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37615755)

  • 1. Memory for abstract control states does not decay with increasing retrieval delays.
    Schiltenwolf M; Kiesel A; Frings C; Dignath D
    Psychol Res; 2024 Mar; 88(2):547-561. PubMed ID: 37615755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Further Evidence for the Binding and Retrieval of Control-States From the Flanker Task.
    Dignath D; Kiesel A
    Exp Psychol; 2021 Sep; 68(5):264-273. PubMed ID: 34911358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Memory Meets Control in Hippocampal and Striatal Binding of Stimuli, Responses, and Attentional Control States.
    Jiang J; Brashier NM; Egner T
    J Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 35(44):14885-95. PubMed ID: 26538657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No temporal decay of cognitive control in the congruency sequence effect.
    Schiltenwolf M; Kiesel A; Dignath D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1247-1263. PubMed ID: 36066855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional control of the creation and retrieval of stimulus-response bindings.
    Hommel B; Memelink J; Zmigrod S; Colzato LS
    Psychol Res; 2014 Jul; 78(4):520-38. PubMed ID: 23884516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Not so social after all: Video-based acquisition of observational stimulus-response bindings.
    Giesen CG; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jun; 217():103330. PubMed ID: 33991796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Registered Replication Report of Weissman, D. H., Jiang, J., & Egner, T. (2014). Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds.
    Gyurkovics M; Kovacs M; Jaquiery M; Palfi B; Dechterenko F; Aczel B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3777-3787. PubMed ID: 32935289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets: experimental dissociations of distractor-response and distractor-target bindings.
    Giesen C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):645-659. PubMed ID: 24294915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple expectancies underlie the congruency sequence effect in confound-minimized tasks.
    Erb CD; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102869. PubMed ID: 31228719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Memory-guided selective attention: Single experiences with conflict have long-lasting effects on cognitive control.
    Brosowsky NP; Crump MJC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Aug; 147(8):1134-1153. PubMed ID: 29771565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the functional significance of retrieval mode: Task switching disrupts the recollection of conceptual stimulus information from episodic memory.
    Küper K
    Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 1678():1-11. PubMed ID: 28986084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Different levels of learning interact to shape the congruency sequence effect.
    Weissman DH; Hawks ZW; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(4):566-83. PubMed ID: 26389630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrieval of bindings between task-irrelevant stimuli and responses can facilitate behaviour under conditions of high response certainty.
    Horner AJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):561-73. PubMed ID: 26085119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mind wandering at encoding, but not at retrieval, disrupts one-shot stimulus-control learning.
    Whitehead PS; Mahmoud Y; Seli P; Egner T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Oct; 83(7):2968-2982. PubMed ID: 34322789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching.
    Benini E; Koch I; Mayr S; Frings C; Philipp AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Aug; 76(8):1872-1888. PubMed ID: 36112986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rumination and inhibition in task switching: no evidence for an association.
    Grange JA
    Cogn Emot; 2023 Feb; 37(1):162-181. PubMed ID: 36779814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task sets serve as boundaries for the congruency sequence effect.
    Grant LD; Cookson SL; Weissman DH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Aug; 46(8):798-812. PubMed ID: 32324028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. David and Goliath-size does matter: size modulates feature-response binding of irrelevant features.
    Singh T; Frings C
    Psychol Res; 2020 Oct; 84(7):2034-2045. PubMed ID: 31020395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive control in cross-modal contexts: Abstract feature transitions of task-related but not task-unrelated stimuli modulate the congruency sequence effect.
    Kelber P; Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jun; 50(6):902-919. PubMed ID: 37883054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parietal Representations of Stimulus Features Are Amplified during Memory Retrieval and Flexibly Aligned with Top-Down Goals.
    Favila SE; Samide R; Sweigart SC; Kuhl BA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 38(36):7809-7821. PubMed ID: 30054390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.