These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3761987)
21. Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyser and Humphrey Matrix Perimeter for the evaluation of glaucoma patients. Chen YH; Wu JN; Chen JT; Lu DW Ophthalmologica; 2008; 222(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 18781091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients. Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs. Bengtsson B; Heijl A Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study. Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y; Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Sensitivity of the computer perimeter Competer in early glaucomatous loss of visual field. A controlled study]. Gramer E; Gerlach R; Krieglstein GK Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1982 Mar; 180(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 7078010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Patterns of glaucomatous visual field progression identified by three progression criteria. Boden C; Blumenthal EZ; Pascual J; McEwan G; Weinreb RN; Medeiros F; Sample PA Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 138(6):1029-36. PubMed ID: 15629296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Site and depth of glaucomatous visual field defects in relation to the size of the neuroretinal edge zone of the optic disk in glaucoma without hypertension, simple glaucoma, pigmentary glaucoma. A clinical study with the Octopus perimeter 201 and the optic nerve head analyzer]. Gramer E; Althaus G; Leydhecker W Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1986 Sep; 189(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 3784407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Visual-field defects in well-defined retinal lesions using Humphrey and Dicon perimeters. Bass SJ; Feldman J Optometry; 2000 Oct; 71(10):643-52. PubMed ID: 11063269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A frequency-doubling perimetric study in normal-tension glaucoma with hemifield defect. Kondo Y; Yamamoto T; Sato Y; Matsubara M; Kitazawa Y J Glaucoma; 1998 Aug; 7(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 9713784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparison of the Synemed Glaucoma and the Humphrey 30-2 threshold perimetry tests. Harwood LW; Remington LA J Am Optom Assoc; 1999 Apr; 70(4):240-4. PubMed ID: 10457700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Graphic analysis of topographic trends in perimetry follow-up of glaucoma]. Weber J; Krieglstein GK; Papoulis C Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1989 Nov; 195(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 2601277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma. Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. What is the most suitable grid for computer perimetry in glaucoma patients? Weber J; Dobek K Ophthalmologica; 1986; 192(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 3703484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The use of static perimetry in the early detection of glaucoma. Drance SM; Wheeler C; Pattullo M Can J Ophthalmol; 1967 Oct; 2(4):249-58. PubMed ID: 6059796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Experimental reproduction of Rönne's step and Bjerrum's scotoma]. DUBOIS-POULSEN A Ann Ocul (Paris); 1956 Jan; 189(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 13302902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]