These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37620244)

  • 21. Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision.
    Tilney HS; Tekkis PP; Sains PS; Constantinides VA; Heriot AG;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Jan; 50(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 17115338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Erratum to "Practice variation in anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: Unravelling differences in failure to rescue" [Eur J Surg Oncol 49 (5) (May 2023) 974-982].
    Ubels S; Matthée E; Verstegen M; Klarenbeek B; Bouwense S; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Daams F; Dekker JWT; van Det MJ; van Esser S; Griffiths EA; Haveman JW; Nieuwenhuijzen G; Siersema PD; Wijnhoven B; Hannink G; van Workum F; Rosman C;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Sep; 49(9):106993. PubMed ID: 37572559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer (Br J Surg 2009; 96: 1348-1357).
    Chan DS; Saklani A
    Br J Surg; 2010 Feb; 97(2):299; author reply 299-300. PubMed ID: 20069592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
    Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer (Br J Surg 2002; 89: 327-34).
    Arumugam PJ; Vivek V; Beynon J
    Br J Surg; 2002 Aug; 89(8):1067; author reply 1067. PubMed ID: 12153637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Circumferential margin plays an independent impact on the outcome of rectal cancer patients receiving curative total mesorectal excision.
    Lin HH; Lin JK; Lin CC; Lan YT; Wang HS; Yang SH; Jiang JK; Chen WS; Lin TC; Liang WY; Chang SC
    Am J Surg; 2013 Nov; 206(5):771-7. PubMed ID: 23871321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Wibe A; Rendedal PR; Svensson E; Norstein J; Eide TJ; Myrvold HE; Søreide O
    Br J Surg; 2002 Mar; 89(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 11872058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of circumferential resection margins on long-term outcomes following rectal cancer surgery.
    Tilney HS; Rasheed S; Northover JM; Tekkis PP
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Oct; 52(10):1723-9. PubMed ID: 19966604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical implication of negative conversion of predicted circumferential resection margin status after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.
    Lee NK; Kim CY; Park YJ; Yang DS; Yoon WS; Kim SH; Kim J
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 24268789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Rectal cancers with microscopic circumferential resection margin involvement (R1 resections): Survivals, patterns of recurrence, and prognostic factors.
    Gravante G; Hemingway D; Stephenson JA; Sharpe D; Osman A; Haines M; Pirjamali V; Sorge R; Yeung JM; Norwood M; Miller A; Boyle K
    J Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 114(5):642-648. PubMed ID: 27383398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prognostic importance of circumferential resection margin in the era of evolving surgical and multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Detering R; Rutgers MLW; Bemelman WA; Hompes R; Tanis PJ
    Surgery; 2021 Aug; 170(2):412-431. PubMed ID: 33838883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Rectum-preserving surgery after consolidation neoadjuvant therapy or totally neoadjuvant therapy for low rectal cancer: a preliminary report].
    Huang Y; Huang SH; Chi P; Wang XJ; Lin HM; Lu XR; Ye DX; Lin Y; Deng Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Mar; 23(3):281-288. PubMed ID: 32192308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. MRI at Restaging After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer Overestimates Circumferential Resection Margin Proximity as Determined by Comparison With Whole-Mount Pathology.
    Yuval JB; Thompson HM; Firat C; Verheij FS; Widmar M; Wei IH; Pappou E; Smith JJ; Weiser MR; Paty PB; Nash GM; Shia J; Gollub MJ; Garcia-Aguilar J
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2022 Apr; 65(4):489-496. PubMed ID: 34803147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity after MRI assessment and adjuvant treatment in 189 patients undergoing rectal cancer resection.
    Simpson GS; Eardley N; McNicol F; Healey P; Hughes M; Rooney PS
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 May; 29(5):585-90. PubMed ID: 24651956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Compliance With Preoperative Elements of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Rectal Cancer Surgery Checklist Improves Pathologic and Postoperative Outcomes.
    Garfinkle R; Vasilevsky CA; Ghitulescu G; Morin N; Faria J; Boutros M
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jan; 63(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 31804269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Risk factors of circumferential resection margin involvement in the patients with extraperitoneal rectal cancer.
    Oh SJ; Shin JY
    J Korean Surg Soc; 2012 Mar; 82(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 22403750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predictors of circumferential resection margin involvement in surgically resected rectal cancer: A retrospective review of 23,464 patients in the US National Cancer Database.
    Al-Sukhni E; Attwood K; Gabriel E; Nurkin SJ
    Int J Surg; 2016 Apr; 28():112-7. PubMed ID: 26906328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Redefining the Positive Circumferential Resection Margin by Incorporating Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Treatment Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Validation Study.
    Lee JH; Chie EK; Jeong SY; Kim TY; Kim DY; Kim TH; Kim SY; Baek JY; Chang HJ; Kim MJ; Park SC; Oh JH; Kim SH; Lee JH; Choi DH; Park HC; Kang SB; Kim JS
    Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Apr; 50(2):506-517. PubMed ID: 28546522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Anti-Cytokeratin (CAM5.2) reagent directed against cytokeratin 8, not cytokeratin 18. Comment on "Improving staging accuracy in colon and rectal cancer by sentinel lymph node mapping: a comparative study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009; 35: 1065-1070.".
    Lin CK; Yao CC; Tseng SW; Han CP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Apr; 36(4):428; author reply 429. PubMed ID: 20133104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population-based retrospective study.
    Liu Q; Luo D; Cai S; Li Q; Li X
    Cancer Med; 2018 Aug; 7(8):3673-3681. PubMed ID: 29992773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.